Tiffany M Halvorsen, Kaitlin A Schroeder, Allison M Jones, Disa Hammarlöf, David A Low, Sanna Koskiniemi, Christopher S Hayes
{"title":"接触依赖性生长抑制(CDI)系统利用了一大批多态离子噬菌体毒素来进行细菌间的竞争。","authors":"Tiffany M Halvorsen, Kaitlin A Schroeder, Allison M Jones, Disa Hammarlöf, David A Low, Sanna Koskiniemi, Christopher S Hayes","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a widespread form of inter-bacterial competition mediated by CdiA effector proteins. CdiA is presented on the inhibitor cell surface and delivers its toxic C-terminal region (CdiA-CT) into neighboring bacteria upon contact. Inhibitor cells also produce CdiI immunity proteins, which neutralize CdiA-CT toxins to prevent auto-inhibition. Here, we describe a diverse group of CDI ionophore toxins that dissipate the transmembrane potential in target bacteria. These CdiA-CT toxins are composed of two distinct domains based on AlphaFold2 modeling. The C-terminal ionophore domains are all predicted to form five-helix bundles capable of spanning the cell membrane. The N-terminal \"entry\" domains are variable in structure and appear to hijack different integral membrane proteins to promote toxin assembly into the lipid bilayer. The CDI ionophores deployed by E. coli isolates partition into six major groups based on their entry domain structures. Comparative sequence analyses led to the identification of receptor proteins for ionophore toxins from groups 1 & 3 (AcrB), group 2 (SecY) and groups 4 (YciB). Using forward genetic approaches, we identify novel receptors for the group 5 and 6 ionophores. Group 5 exploits homologous putrescine import proteins encoded by puuP and plaP, and group 6 toxins recognize di/tripeptide transporters encoded by paralogous dtpA and dtpB genes. Finally, we find that the ionophore domains exhibit significant intra-group sequence variation, particularly at positions that are predicted to interact with CdiI. Accordingly, the corresponding immunity proteins are also highly polymorphic, typically sharing only ~30% sequence identity with members of the same group. Competition experiments confirm that the immunity proteins are specific for their cognate ionophores and provide no protection against other toxins from the same group. The specificity of this protein interaction network provides a mechanism for self/nonself discrimination between E. coli isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"20 11","pages":"e1011494"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems deploy a large family of polymorphic ionophoric toxins for inter-bacterial competition.\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany M Halvorsen, Kaitlin A Schroeder, Allison M Jones, Disa Hammarlöf, David A Low, Sanna Koskiniemi, Christopher S Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a widespread form of inter-bacterial competition mediated by CdiA effector proteins. CdiA is presented on the inhibitor cell surface and delivers its toxic C-terminal region (CdiA-CT) into neighboring bacteria upon contact. Inhibitor cells also produce CdiI immunity proteins, which neutralize CdiA-CT toxins to prevent auto-inhibition. Here, we describe a diverse group of CDI ionophore toxins that dissipate the transmembrane potential in target bacteria. These CdiA-CT toxins are composed of two distinct domains based on AlphaFold2 modeling. The C-terminal ionophore domains are all predicted to form five-helix bundles capable of spanning the cell membrane. The N-terminal \\\"entry\\\" domains are variable in structure and appear to hijack different integral membrane proteins to promote toxin assembly into the lipid bilayer. The CDI ionophores deployed by E. coli isolates partition into six major groups based on their entry domain structures. Comparative sequence analyses led to the identification of receptor proteins for ionophore toxins from groups 1 & 3 (AcrB), group 2 (SecY) and groups 4 (YciB). Using forward genetic approaches, we identify novel receptors for the group 5 and 6 ionophores. Group 5 exploits homologous putrescine import proteins encoded by puuP and plaP, and group 6 toxins recognize di/tripeptide transporters encoded by paralogous dtpA and dtpB genes. Finally, we find that the ionophore domains exhibit significant intra-group sequence variation, particularly at positions that are predicted to interact with CdiI. Accordingly, the corresponding immunity proteins are also highly polymorphic, typically sharing only ~30% sequence identity with members of the same group. Competition experiments confirm that the immunity proteins are specific for their cognate ionophores and provide no protection against other toxins from the same group. The specificity of this protein interaction network provides a mechanism for self/nonself discrimination between E. coli isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"e1011494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630599/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems deploy a large family of polymorphic ionophoric toxins for inter-bacterial competition.
Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a widespread form of inter-bacterial competition mediated by CdiA effector proteins. CdiA is presented on the inhibitor cell surface and delivers its toxic C-terminal region (CdiA-CT) into neighboring bacteria upon contact. Inhibitor cells also produce CdiI immunity proteins, which neutralize CdiA-CT toxins to prevent auto-inhibition. Here, we describe a diverse group of CDI ionophore toxins that dissipate the transmembrane potential in target bacteria. These CdiA-CT toxins are composed of two distinct domains based on AlphaFold2 modeling. The C-terminal ionophore domains are all predicted to form five-helix bundles capable of spanning the cell membrane. The N-terminal "entry" domains are variable in structure and appear to hijack different integral membrane proteins to promote toxin assembly into the lipid bilayer. The CDI ionophores deployed by E. coli isolates partition into six major groups based on their entry domain structures. Comparative sequence analyses led to the identification of receptor proteins for ionophore toxins from groups 1 & 3 (AcrB), group 2 (SecY) and groups 4 (YciB). Using forward genetic approaches, we identify novel receptors for the group 5 and 6 ionophores. Group 5 exploits homologous putrescine import proteins encoded by puuP and plaP, and group 6 toxins recognize di/tripeptide transporters encoded by paralogous dtpA and dtpB genes. Finally, we find that the ionophore domains exhibit significant intra-group sequence variation, particularly at positions that are predicted to interact with CdiI. Accordingly, the corresponding immunity proteins are also highly polymorphic, typically sharing only ~30% sequence identity with members of the same group. Competition experiments confirm that the immunity proteins are specific for their cognate ionophores and provide no protection against other toxins from the same group. The specificity of this protein interaction network provides a mechanism for self/nonself discrimination between E. coli isolates.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.