人类化石清单:直立人出现之前非洲早期人类化石中离散区域和元素代表性的量化与比较。

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103615
Ryan T. McRae , Bernard Wood
{"title":"人类化石清单:直立人出现之前非洲早期人类化石中离散区域和元素代表性的量化与比较。","authors":"Ryan T. McRae ,&nbsp;Bernard Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For all but the past few hundred thousand years, skeletal and dental morphology is the only evidence we have of our extinct ancestors and close hominin relatives. With a few exceptions, most lists of early hominin fossils have been assembled for single sites, formations, or taxa, with little attention paid to how different regions of the skeleton contribute to taxon hypodigms. We recognize there are different ways to divide up the hominin fossil record into taxa, but here, we present an inventory of the fossil evidence for the hypodigms of 14 early African hominin taxa that predate the emergence of <em>Homo erectus.</em> The hypodigms are limited to specimens that have been published and unambiguously attributed to a species. We use a novel, fine-resolution coding scheme that allows us to provide detailed counts of element and subelement abundance by taxon. We then compare the element counts of the taxon hypodigms with each other and with a novel standard based on a perfectly preserved skeleton we refer to as ‘hominin expected.’ The resulting hypodigms generally support commonly held assumptions about the early hominin fossil record (e.g., teeth dominate the hypodigms of all taxa), but they do not support the conventional wisdom that there are differences in the regional representation of the hypodigms of taxa that are found exclusively in eastern versus southern Africa. These data and analyses are a first step in exploring the differences in the composition of early hominin hypodigms. They will allow researchers to focus their comparative research on skeletal regions that are well-represented in the early hominin fossil record, as well as serve as tools for developing and addressing hypodigm-scale hypotheses that are central to our understanding of hominin evolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 103615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hominin fossil inventory: Quantification and comparison of discrete regional and element representation among early African fossil hominins prior to the emergence of Homo erectus\",\"authors\":\"Ryan T. McRae ,&nbsp;Bernard Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For all but the past few hundred thousand years, skeletal and dental morphology is the only evidence we have of our extinct ancestors and close hominin relatives. With a few exceptions, most lists of early hominin fossils have been assembled for single sites, formations, or taxa, with little attention paid to how different regions of the skeleton contribute to taxon hypodigms. We recognize there are different ways to divide up the hominin fossil record into taxa, but here, we present an inventory of the fossil evidence for the hypodigms of 14 early African hominin taxa that predate the emergence of <em>Homo erectus.</em> The hypodigms are limited to specimens that have been published and unambiguously attributed to a species. We use a novel, fine-resolution coding scheme that allows us to provide detailed counts of element and subelement abundance by taxon. We then compare the element counts of the taxon hypodigms with each other and with a novel standard based on a perfectly preserved skeleton we refer to as ‘hominin expected.’ The resulting hypodigms generally support commonly held assumptions about the early hominin fossil record (e.g., teeth dominate the hypodigms of all taxa), but they do not support the conventional wisdom that there are differences in the regional representation of the hypodigms of taxa that are found exclusively in eastern versus southern Africa. These data and analyses are a first step in exploring the differences in the composition of early hominin hypodigms. They will allow researchers to focus their comparative research on skeletal regions that are well-represented in the early hominin fossil record, as well as serve as tools for developing and addressing hypodigm-scale hypotheses that are central to our understanding of hominin evolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424001234\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424001234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了过去的几十万年之外,骨骼和牙齿形态是我们所掌握的关于我们已经灭绝的祖先和类人近亲的唯一证据。除少数例外情况外,大多数早期类人化石清单都是针对单一地点、地层或类群编制的,很少关注骨骼的不同区域如何对类群的下位化石做出贡献。我们认识到,将类人化石记录划分为类群有不同的方法,但在这里,我们列出了直立人出现之前 14 个非洲早期类人类群的下位化石证据清单。下鳞片仅限于已经发表并明确归属于某个物种的标本。我们采用了一种新颖的、精细分辨率的编码方案,可以按类群提供元素和亚元素丰度的详细计数。然后,我们将分类群的元素计数与其他分类群进行比较,并与一个基于完美保存的骨骼的新标准进行比较,我们称之为 "预期类人猿"。得出的下位图总体上支持关于早期类人化石记录的普遍假设(例如,牙齿在所有类群的下位图中占主导地位),但它们并不支持传统观点,即只在非洲东部和南部发现的类群的下位图在地区代表性上存在差异。这些数据和分析是探索早期类人下楔组成差异的第一步。它们将使研究人员把比较研究的重点放在早期类人化石记录中代表性较强的骨骼区域,同时也是开发和解决下鳞片尺度假说的工具,而下鳞片尺度假说对我们了解类人的进化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hominin fossil inventory: Quantification and comparison of discrete regional and element representation among early African fossil hominins prior to the emergence of Homo erectus
For all but the past few hundred thousand years, skeletal and dental morphology is the only evidence we have of our extinct ancestors and close hominin relatives. With a few exceptions, most lists of early hominin fossils have been assembled for single sites, formations, or taxa, with little attention paid to how different regions of the skeleton contribute to taxon hypodigms. We recognize there are different ways to divide up the hominin fossil record into taxa, but here, we present an inventory of the fossil evidence for the hypodigms of 14 early African hominin taxa that predate the emergence of Homo erectus. The hypodigms are limited to specimens that have been published and unambiguously attributed to a species. We use a novel, fine-resolution coding scheme that allows us to provide detailed counts of element and subelement abundance by taxon. We then compare the element counts of the taxon hypodigms with each other and with a novel standard based on a perfectly preserved skeleton we refer to as ‘hominin expected.’ The resulting hypodigms generally support commonly held assumptions about the early hominin fossil record (e.g., teeth dominate the hypodigms of all taxa), but they do not support the conventional wisdom that there are differences in the regional representation of the hypodigms of taxa that are found exclusively in eastern versus southern Africa. These data and analyses are a first step in exploring the differences in the composition of early hominin hypodigms. They will allow researchers to focus their comparative research on skeletal regions that are well-represented in the early hominin fossil record, as well as serve as tools for developing and addressing hypodigm-scale hypotheses that are central to our understanding of hominin evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
期刊最新文献
New modern and Pleistocene fossil micromammal assemblages from Swartkrans, South Africa: Paleobiodiversity, taphonomic, and environmental context. Contextualizing the Upper Paleolithic of the Armenian Highlands: New data from Solak-1, central Armenia. Reanalysis of Samburupithecus reveals similarities to nyanzapithecines. Taxonomic revision of the SK 15 mandible based on bone and tooth structural organization. Postcranial evidence does not support habitual bipedalism in Sahelanthropus tchadensis: A reply to Daver et al. (2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1