在斜向偏置和 NCAP 正面碰撞试验中,限制肩带负荷对右前乘客运动学的影响。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2419776
David C Viano
{"title":"在斜向偏置和 NCAP 正面碰撞试验中,限制肩带负荷对右前乘客运动学的影响。","authors":"David C Viano","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2419776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of shoulder-belt load-limiting was evaluated on right-front passenger kinematics in 90 km/h oblique OMDB (offset moving deformable barrier) impacts and compared to kinematics in 56 km/h NCAP crash tests. The study focused on the influence of webbing pulling out of the retractor increasing forward excursion of the upper torso and head.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 OMDB crash tests were conducted by NHTSA at 90 km/h. The barrier was aligned at a 15 deg angle to the left (345 deg PDOF) with 35% overlap of the struck vehicle. The kinematics and biomechanical responses of the 50<sup>th</sup> THOR passenger dummy were analyzed. The tests included 3 onboard video cameras covering the front occupants. The lap and shoulder belt loads were measured and displacement of the shoulder belt was available for most tests. The responses were compared to those in 11 NCAP frontal impacts at 56 km/h with a 5<sup>th</sup> Hybrid III passenger.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The delta V was 62.6 ± 2.8 km/h in the passenger car OMDB tests. The pretensioners and airbags deployed by 40 ms. The pretensioner pulled in -62 ± 29 mm of webbing at 13-15 m/s. With the retractor locked, belt loads increased as the passenger moved forward and inboard. The load-limiter paid out 280 ± 67 mm of shoulder belt webbing at 6-11 m/s and peak load of 4,170 ± 557 N. The shoulder belt slipped off the shoulder at 97 ± 10 ms. By 120 ms, the left shoulder impacted the center of the instrument panel and the head either impacted the panel or perched on the left edge of the airbag with the head rotated 80-135 deg about the z-axis (eyes right). There was 187.3 ± 37.4 mm of loose webbing after the test. Similar dummy responses were seen in the SUV and truck tests. In contrast, the passenger kinematics were centered on the airbag in NCAP tests without impact on the interior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excursion of the upper torso with the load-limiting shoulder belt enabled the belt to slip off the right shoulder in ODMB tests. The passenger flexed forward around the lap belt with impact on the center of the instrument panel. The upper torso lacked sufficient restraint with the level of load limiting in the tests. The belts were loose after pretensioning and load-limiting reducing the restraint effectiveness if there were a second or third impact or rollover in the collision sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests.\",\"authors\":\"David C Viano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2024.2419776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of shoulder-belt load-limiting was evaluated on right-front passenger kinematics in 90 km/h oblique OMDB (offset moving deformable barrier) impacts and compared to kinematics in 56 km/h NCAP crash tests. The study focused on the influence of webbing pulling out of the retractor increasing forward excursion of the upper torso and head.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 OMDB crash tests were conducted by NHTSA at 90 km/h. The barrier was aligned at a 15 deg angle to the left (345 deg PDOF) with 35% overlap of the struck vehicle. The kinematics and biomechanical responses of the 50<sup>th</sup> THOR passenger dummy were analyzed. The tests included 3 onboard video cameras covering the front occupants. The lap and shoulder belt loads were measured and displacement of the shoulder belt was available for most tests. The responses were compared to those in 11 NCAP frontal impacts at 56 km/h with a 5<sup>th</sup> Hybrid III passenger.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The delta V was 62.6 ± 2.8 km/h in the passenger car OMDB tests. The pretensioners and airbags deployed by 40 ms. The pretensioner pulled in -62 ± 29 mm of webbing at 13-15 m/s. With the retractor locked, belt loads increased as the passenger moved forward and inboard. The load-limiter paid out 280 ± 67 mm of shoulder belt webbing at 6-11 m/s and peak load of 4,170 ± 557 N. The shoulder belt slipped off the shoulder at 97 ± 10 ms. By 120 ms, the left shoulder impacted the center of the instrument panel and the head either impacted the panel or perched on the left edge of the airbag with the head rotated 80-135 deg about the z-axis (eyes right). There was 187.3 ± 37.4 mm of loose webbing after the test. Similar dummy responses were seen in the SUV and truck tests. In contrast, the passenger kinematics were centered on the airbag in NCAP tests without impact on the interior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excursion of the upper torso with the load-limiting shoulder belt enabled the belt to slip off the right shoulder in ODMB tests. The passenger flexed forward around the lap belt with impact on the center of the instrument panel. The upper torso lacked sufficient restraint with the level of load limiting in the tests. The belts were loose after pretensioning and load-limiting reducing the restraint effectiveness if there were a second or third impact or rollover in the collision sequence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2419776\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2419776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估肩带负载限制在 90 km/h 斜向 OMDB(偏置移动可变形障碍)碰撞中对右前乘客运动学的影响,并与 56 km/h NCAP 碰撞试验中的运动学进行比较。研究重点是织带从牵引器中拉出对增加上身和头部前移的影响。方法:NHTSA 以 90 km/h 的速度进行了 18 次 OMDB 碰撞测试。障碍物向左倾斜 15 度(345 度 PDOF),与被撞车辆重叠 35%。对第 50 位 THOR 乘客假人的运动学和生物力学反应进行了分析。测试包括 3 个覆盖前排乘员的车载摄像机。大多数测试都测量了膝部和肩部安全带的负荷,并提供了肩部安全带的位移情况。测试结果与 11 次 NCAP 正面碰撞(时速 56 公里)中第 5 次混合动力 III 乘员的反应进行了比较:结果:在乘用车 OMDB 测试中,Delta V 为 62.6 ± 2.8 km/h。预紧器和安全气囊的展开时间为 40 毫秒。预紧器以 13-15 米/秒的速度拉入 -62 ± 29 毫米的织带。在卷收器锁定的情况下,安全带负荷随着乘客向前和向内移动而增加。负荷限制器在 6-11 米/秒的速度和 4,170 ± 557 牛顿的峰值负荷下拉出 280 ± 67 毫米的肩带织带。在 97 ± 10 毫秒时,肩带从肩部滑落。到 120 毫秒时,左肩撞击仪表板中心,头部撞击仪表板或停留在安全气囊左侧边缘,头部围绕 Z 轴旋转 80-135 度(右眼)。测试后,松动的织带为 187.3 ± 37.4 毫米。在 SUV 和卡车测试中也出现了类似的假人反应。相反,在 NCAP 测试中,乘客的运动轨迹以安全气囊为中心,没有对车内造成影响:结论:在 ODMB 测试中,肩带负载限制的上部躯干偏移使肩带从右肩滑落。乘客绕着膝部安全带向前弯曲,撞击仪表板中央。在测试中,上部躯干在负载限制水平下缺乏足够的约束。如果在碰撞过程中发生第二次或第三次撞击或翻滚,预紧和负载限制后的安全带会松动,从而降低约束效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests.

Objective: The effect of shoulder-belt load-limiting was evaluated on right-front passenger kinematics in 90 km/h oblique OMDB (offset moving deformable barrier) impacts and compared to kinematics in 56 km/h NCAP crash tests. The study focused on the influence of webbing pulling out of the retractor increasing forward excursion of the upper torso and head.

Methods: 18 OMDB crash tests were conducted by NHTSA at 90 km/h. The barrier was aligned at a 15 deg angle to the left (345 deg PDOF) with 35% overlap of the struck vehicle. The kinematics and biomechanical responses of the 50th THOR passenger dummy were analyzed. The tests included 3 onboard video cameras covering the front occupants. The lap and shoulder belt loads were measured and displacement of the shoulder belt was available for most tests. The responses were compared to those in 11 NCAP frontal impacts at 56 km/h with a 5th Hybrid III passenger.

Results: The delta V was 62.6 ± 2.8 km/h in the passenger car OMDB tests. The pretensioners and airbags deployed by 40 ms. The pretensioner pulled in -62 ± 29 mm of webbing at 13-15 m/s. With the retractor locked, belt loads increased as the passenger moved forward and inboard. The load-limiter paid out 280 ± 67 mm of shoulder belt webbing at 6-11 m/s and peak load of 4,170 ± 557 N. The shoulder belt slipped off the shoulder at 97 ± 10 ms. By 120 ms, the left shoulder impacted the center of the instrument panel and the head either impacted the panel or perched on the left edge of the airbag with the head rotated 80-135 deg about the z-axis (eyes right). There was 187.3 ± 37.4 mm of loose webbing after the test. Similar dummy responses were seen in the SUV and truck tests. In contrast, the passenger kinematics were centered on the airbag in NCAP tests without impact on the interior.

Conclusions: Excursion of the upper torso with the load-limiting shoulder belt enabled the belt to slip off the right shoulder in ODMB tests. The passenger flexed forward around the lap belt with impact on the center of the instrument panel. The upper torso lacked sufficient restraint with the level of load limiting in the tests. The belts were loose after pretensioning and load-limiting reducing the restraint effectiveness if there were a second or third impact or rollover in the collision sequence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Capturing signals of road traffic safety risk: based on the spatial-temporal correlation between traffic violations and crashes. The use of prescription medication and other drugs by New Zealand drivers with illegal blood alcohol levels. Unpacking the COVID-19 roadway fatality paradox: an analysis of motor vehicle crashes in Michigan 2019-2022. Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors. Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1