产前护理综合指数的开发与测试:不同种族和族裔群体与早产和胎龄偏小的关系。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13707
Sueny P. Lima dos Santos MS, Eric E. Calloway PhD, RDN, Ilana R. A. Chertok PhD, MSN, RN, IBCLC, Zelalem T. Haile PhD, MPH
{"title":"产前护理综合指数的开发与测试:不同种族和族裔群体与早产和胎龄偏小的关系。","authors":"Sueny P. Lima dos Santos MS,&nbsp;Eric E. Calloway PhD, RDN,&nbsp;Ilana R. A. Chertok PhD, MSN, RN, IBCLC,&nbsp;Zelalem T. Haile PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) are significant public health concerns in the United States, with pronounced disparities across racial and ethnic groups. Traditional prenatal care adequacy indices have limitations in fully capturing their multifaceted nature. Our study introduces the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index (CPCI) to provide a more holistic assessment of prenatal care by integrating key elements of prenatal counseling and health promotion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-2021 data. The CPCI was developed based on a comprehensive literature review, incorporating components such as timing, frequency, and content of prenatal visits. The index was validated using Item Response Theory (IRT) and compared with the Kotelchuck and Kessner Indices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 139,181 pregnant women. The CPCI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.75; ω total, 0.81). IRT analysis confirmed the index's ability to capture variability in the quality of prenatal care, with item difficulty parameters ranging from −2.93 to +2.10. CPCI scores were significantly associated with reduced odds of adverse birth outcomes. Adequate CPCI care was linked to a 63% reduction in the odds of preterm birth among non-Hispanic White women, with similar reductions observed in Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR], 0.59) and Asian women (OR, 0.38). For SGA, adequate care was protective among non-Hispanic White (OR, 0.86) and Hispanic women (OR, 0.82) but showed mixed results in other groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The CPCI provides a more inclusive measure of the quality of prenatal care compared with traditional indices. The study's findings suggest a significant role of comprehensive prenatal care in reducing adverse birth outcomes and addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Future research should focus on refining the CPCI and exploring its applicability in diverse populations to inform targeted and culturally sensitive prenatal care strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"69 6","pages":"917-928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Testing of the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index: Relationship With Preterm Birth and Small for Gestational Age Across Racial and Ethnic Groups\",\"authors\":\"Sueny P. Lima dos Santos MS,&nbsp;Eric E. Calloway PhD, RDN,&nbsp;Ilana R. A. Chertok PhD, MSN, RN, IBCLC,&nbsp;Zelalem T. Haile PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) are significant public health concerns in the United States, with pronounced disparities across racial and ethnic groups. Traditional prenatal care adequacy indices have limitations in fully capturing their multifaceted nature. Our study introduces the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index (CPCI) to provide a more holistic assessment of prenatal care by integrating key elements of prenatal counseling and health promotion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-2021 data. The CPCI was developed based on a comprehensive literature review, incorporating components such as timing, frequency, and content of prenatal visits. The index was validated using Item Response Theory (IRT) and compared with the Kotelchuck and Kessner Indices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study included 139,181 pregnant women. The CPCI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.75; ω total, 0.81). IRT analysis confirmed the index's ability to capture variability in the quality of prenatal care, with item difficulty parameters ranging from −2.93 to +2.10. CPCI scores were significantly associated with reduced odds of adverse birth outcomes. Adequate CPCI care was linked to a 63% reduction in the odds of preterm birth among non-Hispanic White women, with similar reductions observed in Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR], 0.59) and Asian women (OR, 0.38). For SGA, adequate care was protective among non-Hispanic White (OR, 0.86) and Hispanic women (OR, 0.82) but showed mixed results in other groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CPCI provides a more inclusive measure of the quality of prenatal care compared with traditional indices. The study's findings suggest a significant role of comprehensive prenatal care in reducing adverse birth outcomes and addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Future research should focus on refining the CPCI and exploring its applicability in diverse populations to inform targeted and culturally sensitive prenatal care strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"917-928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:早产和胎龄过小 (SGA) 是美国重大的公共卫生问题,不同种族和民族群体之间存在明显差异。传统的产前保健充分性指数在全面反映其多面性方面存在局限性。我们的研究引入了产前护理综合指数(CPCI),通过整合产前咨询和健康促进的关键要素,对产前护理进行更全面的评估:这项横断面研究使用了 2016-2021 年妊娠风险评估监测系统的数据。CPCI 是在综合文献回顾的基础上开发的,包含了产前检查的时间、频率和内容等要素。该指数采用项目反应理论(IRT)进行了验证,并与 Kotelchuck 和 Kessner 指数进行了比较:研究共纳入 139 181 名孕妇。CPCI 显示出很强的内部一致性(Cronbach's α,0.75;ω total,0.81)。IRT分析证实了该指数能够捕捉产前护理质量的变异性,项目难度参数范围在-2.93至+2.10之间。CPCI 分数与不良分娩结局几率的降低有明显关联。在非西班牙裔白人妇女中,充分的 CPCI 护理可将早产几率降低 63%,在西班牙裔妇女(几率比 [OR],0.59)和亚裔妇女(OR,0.38)中也观察到类似的降低。就 SGA 而言,适当的护理对非西班牙裔白人妇女(OR,0.86)和西班牙裔妇女(OR,0.82)具有保护作用,但对其他群体的影响则不尽相同:讨论:与传统指数相比,CPCI 提供了一个更具包容性的产前护理质量衡量标准。研究结果表明,综合产前护理在减少不良分娩结局和解决种族及民族差异方面发挥着重要作用。未来的研究应侧重于完善 CPCI 并探索其在不同人群中的适用性,从而为有针对性的、文化敏感的产前护理策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Testing of the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index: Relationship With Preterm Birth and Small for Gestational Age Across Racial and Ethnic Groups

Introduction

Preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) are significant public health concerns in the United States, with pronounced disparities across racial and ethnic groups. Traditional prenatal care adequacy indices have limitations in fully capturing their multifaceted nature. Our study introduces the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index (CPCI) to provide a more holistic assessment of prenatal care by integrating key elements of prenatal counseling and health promotion.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-2021 data. The CPCI was developed based on a comprehensive literature review, incorporating components such as timing, frequency, and content of prenatal visits. The index was validated using Item Response Theory (IRT) and compared with the Kotelchuck and Kessner Indices.

Results

The study included 139,181 pregnant women. The CPCI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.75; ω total, 0.81). IRT analysis confirmed the index's ability to capture variability in the quality of prenatal care, with item difficulty parameters ranging from −2.93 to +2.10. CPCI scores were significantly associated with reduced odds of adverse birth outcomes. Adequate CPCI care was linked to a 63% reduction in the odds of preterm birth among non-Hispanic White women, with similar reductions observed in Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR], 0.59) and Asian women (OR, 0.38). For SGA, adequate care was protective among non-Hispanic White (OR, 0.86) and Hispanic women (OR, 0.82) but showed mixed results in other groups.

Discussion

The CPCI provides a more inclusive measure of the quality of prenatal care compared with traditional indices. The study's findings suggest a significant role of comprehensive prenatal care in reducing adverse birth outcomes and addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Future research should focus on refining the CPCI and exploring its applicability in diverse populations to inform targeted and culturally sensitive prenatal care strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Challenges in Antenatal Care (2024-002JMWH) Center M Pilot Trial: Integrating Preventive Mental Health Care in Routine Prenatal Care Challenges for Antepartum Care of the Individual with Perinatal Substance Use: An Empirical Integrative Review of Novel Approaches to Improve Care Family-Centered Antenatal Care With a Life-Limiting Fetal Condition: A Developmental Theory-Guided Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1