评估 COVID-19 大流行期间基于 CBT 的普通人群心理健康计划:使用聊天机器人和数字化小组干预的阶梯式护理方法

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1155/2024/8950388
Till Langhammer, Kevin Hilbert, Robert Wasenmueller, Berit Praxl, Andrea Ertle, Julia Asbrand, Ulrike Lueken
{"title":"评估 COVID-19 大流行期间基于 CBT 的普通人群心理健康计划:使用聊天机器人和数字化小组干预的阶梯式护理方法","authors":"Till Langhammer,&nbsp;Kevin Hilbert,&nbsp;Robert Wasenmueller,&nbsp;Berit Praxl,&nbsp;Andrea Ertle,&nbsp;Julia Asbrand,&nbsp;Ulrike Lueken","doi":"10.1155/2024/8950388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic exposed a substantial portion of society to multiple stressors, while access to mental health care was limited. To address this, we introduced a digital stepped-care program rooted in cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, aiming to alleviate mental health distress among the general public seeking help.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The program comprises a 4-week digital application using “Aury” the chatbot, followed by an optional 6-week online group session for those still symptomatic. A 4-week waiting period separated these steps. Participants entered based on self-identified mental health concerns. Interventions addressed prevalent pandemic mental health issues: sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, worry/rumination, interpersonal issues, and resource mobilization. Outcomes focused on depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ).</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Of the 1261 initial participants, postchatbot results (<i>N</i> = 142) indicated small to medium effects (<i>d</i> = 0.412 to <i>d</i> = 0.523). Those finishing the entire program (<i>N</i> = 41) saw substantial symptom decline with medium to large effects (<i>d</i> = 0.757 to <i>d</i> = 0.818). No shifts were seen in the waiting phase. At follow-up 6 months after baseline, both groups—those who only used the chatbot (<i>N</i> = 60; <i>d</i> = 0.284 to <i>d</i> = 0.416) and those who completed the entire program (<i>N</i> = 27; <i>d</i> = 0.854 to <i>d</i> = 0.926)—showed sustained symptom reduction. Comparing groups that received no intervention, used the chatbot only, and completed the entire program, we observed a dose–response effect.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> This resource-efficient and adaptable digital approach effectively reduced pandemic-induced mental health issues, indicating its potential in crisis periods with limited health resources. Randomized controlled trials are recommended for further validation.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinical Trial Registry identifier: DRKS00023220.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8950388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a CBT-Based Program for Mental Health in the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stepped-Care Approach Using a Chatbot and Digitized Group Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Till Langhammer,&nbsp;Kevin Hilbert,&nbsp;Robert Wasenmueller,&nbsp;Berit Praxl,&nbsp;Andrea Ertle,&nbsp;Julia Asbrand,&nbsp;Ulrike Lueken\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8950388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic exposed a substantial portion of society to multiple stressors, while access to mental health care was limited. To address this, we introduced a digital stepped-care program rooted in cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, aiming to alleviate mental health distress among the general public seeking help.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The program comprises a 4-week digital application using “Aury” the chatbot, followed by an optional 6-week online group session for those still symptomatic. A 4-week waiting period separated these steps. Participants entered based on self-identified mental health concerns. Interventions addressed prevalent pandemic mental health issues: sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, worry/rumination, interpersonal issues, and resource mobilization. Outcomes focused on depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ).</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Of the 1261 initial participants, postchatbot results (<i>N</i> = 142) indicated small to medium effects (<i>d</i> = 0.412 to <i>d</i> = 0.523). Those finishing the entire program (<i>N</i> = 41) saw substantial symptom decline with medium to large effects (<i>d</i> = 0.757 to <i>d</i> = 0.818). No shifts were seen in the waiting phase. At follow-up 6 months after baseline, both groups—those who only used the chatbot (<i>N</i> = 60; <i>d</i> = 0.284 to <i>d</i> = 0.416) and those who completed the entire program (<i>N</i> = 27; <i>d</i> = 0.854 to <i>d</i> = 0.926)—showed sustained symptom reduction. Comparing groups that received no intervention, used the chatbot only, and completed the entire program, we observed a dose–response effect.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> This resource-efficient and adaptable digital approach effectively reduced pandemic-induced mental health issues, indicating its potential in crisis periods with limited health resources. Randomized controlled trials are recommended for further validation.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinical Trial Registry identifier: DRKS00023220.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8950388\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8950388\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8950388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行使社会上相当一部分人面临多重压力,而获得心理健康护理的机会却很有限。为解决这一问题,我们引入了一项基于认知行为疗法(CBT)原理的数字化阶梯式护理计划,旨在减轻寻求帮助的普通大众的心理健康困扰。 方法:该项目包括使用聊天机器人 "Aury "进行为期4周的数字应用,然后为仍有症状的人提供为期6周的可选在线小组课程。这些步骤之间有 4 周的等待期。参与者根据自我认定的心理健康问题加入。干预措施针对的是大流行病中普遍存在的心理健康问题:睡眠障碍、焦虑、抑郁、担忧/烦恼、人际关系问题和资源调动。结果主要集中在抑郁、焦虑和躯体症状上,通过患者健康问卷(PHQ)进行评估。 结果:在 1261 名初始参与者中,chatbot 后的结果(N = 142)显示了小到中等的效果(d = 0.412 到 d = 0.523)。完成整个项目的参与者(N = 41)症状明显减轻,效果为中度到重度(d = 0.757 到 d = 0.818)。在等待阶段,症状没有发生变化。在基线后 6 个月的随访中,两组--只使用聊天机器人的一组(N = 60;d = 0.284 到 d = 0.416)和完成整个项目的一组(N = 27;d = 0.854 到 d = 0.926)--都显示症状持续减轻。比较未接受干预组、仅使用聊天机器人组和完成整个项目组,我们观察到了剂量反应效应。 结论这种资源效率高、适应性强的数字化方法有效减少了大流行引发的心理健康问题,表明它在卫生资源有限的危机时期具有潜力。建议进行随机对照试验以进一步验证。 试验注册:临床试验注册标识符:DRKS00023220:DRKS00023220.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a CBT-Based Program for Mental Health in the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stepped-Care Approach Using a Chatbot and Digitized Group Intervention

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed a substantial portion of society to multiple stressors, while access to mental health care was limited. To address this, we introduced a digital stepped-care program rooted in cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, aiming to alleviate mental health distress among the general public seeking help.

Methods: The program comprises a 4-week digital application using “Aury” the chatbot, followed by an optional 6-week online group session for those still symptomatic. A 4-week waiting period separated these steps. Participants entered based on self-identified mental health concerns. Interventions addressed prevalent pandemic mental health issues: sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, worry/rumination, interpersonal issues, and resource mobilization. Outcomes focused on depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ).

Results: Of the 1261 initial participants, postchatbot results (N = 142) indicated small to medium effects (d = 0.412 to d = 0.523). Those finishing the entire program (N = 41) saw substantial symptom decline with medium to large effects (d = 0.757 to d = 0.818). No shifts were seen in the waiting phase. At follow-up 6 months after baseline, both groups—those who only used the chatbot (N = 60; d = 0.284 to d = 0.416) and those who completed the entire program (N = 27; d = 0.854 to d = 0.926)—showed sustained symptom reduction. Comparing groups that received no intervention, used the chatbot only, and completed the entire program, we observed a dose–response effect.

Conclusions: This resource-efficient and adaptable digital approach effectively reduced pandemic-induced mental health issues, indicating its potential in crisis periods with limited health resources. Randomized controlled trials are recommended for further validation.

Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry identifier: DRKS00023220.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Associations Between Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence, Early Adulthood, and Old Age: Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analyses Healthcare Utilization and Costs in Patients With Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders Compared With Those With Depression and Healthy Controls: A Nationwide Cohort Study The Pathologic Roles and Therapeutic Implications of Ghrelin/GHSR System in Mental Disorders Caregiver-Level Mental Health as a Contextual Effect in the Association Between Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis Developing the Fear of Disasters Scale and Exploring Its Psychometric Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1