{"title":"吸电子烟与大肠癌筛查。","authors":"Eugene Annor, Joseph Atarere, Quarshie Glover, Nneoma Ubah, Chinenye Odo, Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Moyasar Osman, Christopher Thompson","doi":"10.1177/08901171241304726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241304726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Annor, Joseph Atarere, Quarshie Glover, Nneoma Ubah, Chinenye Odo, Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Moyasar Osman, Christopher Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241304726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171241304726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241304726\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241304726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Purpose: To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.
Design: Cross-sectional study design.
Setting: National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).
Subjects: Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.
Measures: Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.
Analysis: The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.
Results: We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.
Conclusion: Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.