吸电子烟与大肠癌筛查。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1177/08901171241304726
Eugene Annor, Joseph Atarere, Quarshie Glover, Nneoma Ubah, Chinenye Odo, Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Moyasar Osman, Christopher Thompson
{"title":"吸电子烟与大肠癌筛查。","authors":"Eugene Annor, Joseph Atarere, Quarshie Glover, Nneoma Ubah, Chinenye Odo, Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Moyasar Osman, Christopher Thompson","doi":"10.1177/08901171241304726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241304726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Annor, Joseph Atarere, Quarshie Glover, Nneoma Ubah, Chinenye Odo, Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Moyasar Osman, Christopher Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241304726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171241304726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241304726\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241304726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估电子烟使用者和非使用者的 CRC 筛查方法有何不同:设计:横断面研究设计:美国国家癌症研究所的健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS 5):调查对象:年龄在 45 岁至 75 岁之间的受访者:人口统计学、儿童癌症筛查、电子烟使用、癌症史、是否有合并症以及是否有初级保健提供者:使用卡方检验对研究参与者的人口统计学特征和电子烟吸烟状况进行评估。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了电子烟使用者和非使用者在儿童癌症筛查方面的差异:我们共确定了 6963 名参与者,其中 181 人(2.6%)是电子烟使用者。电子烟使用率与年龄成反比。很大一部分人没有保险(10.7%,而非使用者为 5.9%),近一半(49.9%)的人目前是烟草烟民。与不使用电子烟的人相比,使用电子烟的人接受 CRC 筛查的几率更高[OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]。年龄、教育程度、医疗保险、合并症、初级保健提供者、个人癌症病史和合并症的增加与更多人参与 CRC 筛查有关。然而,使用电子烟与筛查率的提高无关:我们的研究发现,电子烟使用者和非使用者的 CRC 筛查率没有明显差异。虽然筛查行为目前似乎未受影响,但鉴于使用电子烟的长期影响尚不确定,随着越来越多的用户达到筛查年龄,持续监测非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Purpose: To evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.

Design: Cross-sectional study design.

Setting: National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).

Subjects: Respondents aged 45 to 75 years.

Measures: Demographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.

Analysis: The demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results: We identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.

Conclusion: Our study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Exploring How Neighborhood Environment Perceptions Moderate the Health Benefits of Movement Behaviors Among Latinos in Los Angeles. Leveling the Playing Field: Opportunities for School Recess to Promote Wellness and Reduce Disparities in Elementary School Children. Knowledge About HIV/AIDS and its Transmission and Misconception Among Women in Thailand: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Cultivating Spiritual Well-Being in a University Setting. Editor's Desk: Why It's Time to Address Spirituality as Part of a Comprehensive Approach to Workplace Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1