Hekai Fan, Wenshi Zhang, Li Wu, Dong Zhang, Chen Ye, Dezhi Wang, Hao Jiang, Quanfa Zhang
{"title":"土壤氮的生物地球化学和水文特征决定了河流中的硝酸盐含量。","authors":"Hekai Fan, Wenshi Zhang, Li Wu, Dong Zhang, Chen Ye, Dezhi Wang, Hao Jiang, Quanfa Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02319-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high levels of nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) in the surface water have contributed to eutrophication and other eco-environmental damages worldwide. Although the excessive NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations in rivers were often attributed to anthropogenic activities, some undisturbed or slightly disturbed rivers also had high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels. This study utilized multi-pronged approaches (i.e., river natural abundance isotopes, <sup>15</sup>N-labeling techniques, and qPCR) to provide a comprehensive explanation of the reason for the high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels in a river draining forest-dominated terrene. The river natural abundance isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N/δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) indicated that the soil source (i.e., soil organic nitrogen-SON and chemical fertilizer-CF) were the primary contributors to the NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, and the NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> removal was probably prevalent in the basin scale. The <sup>15</sup>N-labeling techniques quantitatively showed that denitrification and anammox were stronger than nitrification in the soils and sediments. Structural equation models suggested that nitrification in the soils was regulated by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N contents, which, in turn, were closely related to fertilization in spring. Denitrification and anammox were largely controlled by elevation and functional gene abundances (i.e., nirK and hzsB, respectively). The hydrological isotopes (i.e., δD/δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O) indicated that the transport of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> from soil to the river was related to the intensity of runoff leaching to the soil, In contrast, the riverine NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was largely from point sources; thus, increasing runoff led to a dilution effect. This study clearly showed that soil biogeochemistry and hydrological condition of a river basin jointly shaped the high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels in the almost undisturbed river.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil nitrogen biogeochemistry and hydrological characteristics shape the nitrate levels in a river.\",\"authors\":\"Hekai Fan, Wenshi Zhang, Li Wu, Dong Zhang, Chen Ye, Dezhi Wang, Hao Jiang, Quanfa Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10653-024-02319-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The high levels of nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) in the surface water have contributed to eutrophication and other eco-environmental damages worldwide. Although the excessive NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations in rivers were often attributed to anthropogenic activities, some undisturbed or slightly disturbed rivers also had high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels. This study utilized multi-pronged approaches (i.e., river natural abundance isotopes, <sup>15</sup>N-labeling techniques, and qPCR) to provide a comprehensive explanation of the reason for the high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels in a river draining forest-dominated terrene. The river natural abundance isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N/δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) indicated that the soil source (i.e., soil organic nitrogen-SON and chemical fertilizer-CF) were the primary contributors to the NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, and the NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> removal was probably prevalent in the basin scale. The <sup>15</sup>N-labeling techniques quantitatively showed that denitrification and anammox were stronger than nitrification in the soils and sediments. Structural equation models suggested that nitrification in the soils was regulated by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N contents, which, in turn, were closely related to fertilization in spring. Denitrification and anammox were largely controlled by elevation and functional gene abundances (i.e., nirK and hzsB, respectively). The hydrological isotopes (i.e., δD/δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O) indicated that the transport of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> from soil to the river was related to the intensity of runoff leaching to the soil, In contrast, the riverine NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was largely from point sources; thus, increasing runoff led to a dilution effect. This study clearly showed that soil biogeochemistry and hydrological condition of a river basin jointly shaped the high NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> levels in the almost undisturbed river.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02319-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02319-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil nitrogen biogeochemistry and hydrological characteristics shape the nitrate levels in a river.
The high levels of nitrate (NO3-) in the surface water have contributed to eutrophication and other eco-environmental damages worldwide. Although the excessive NO3- concentrations in rivers were often attributed to anthropogenic activities, some undisturbed or slightly disturbed rivers also had high NO3- levels. This study utilized multi-pronged approaches (i.e., river natural abundance isotopes, 15N-labeling techniques, and qPCR) to provide a comprehensive explanation of the reason for the high NO3- levels in a river draining forest-dominated terrene. The river natural abundance isotopes (δ15N/δ18O-NO3-) indicated that the soil source (i.e., soil organic nitrogen-SON and chemical fertilizer-CF) were the primary contributors to the NO3-, and the NO3- removal was probably prevalent in the basin scale. The 15N-labeling techniques quantitatively showed that denitrification and anammox were stronger than nitrification in the soils and sediments. Structural equation models suggested that nitrification in the soils was regulated by NH4+-N contents, which, in turn, were closely related to fertilization in spring. Denitrification and anammox were largely controlled by elevation and functional gene abundances (i.e., nirK and hzsB, respectively). The hydrological isotopes (i.e., δD/δ18O-H2O) indicated that the transport of NO3- from soil to the river was related to the intensity of runoff leaching to the soil, In contrast, the riverine NH4+ was largely from point sources; thus, increasing runoff led to a dilution effect. This study clearly showed that soil biogeochemistry and hydrological condition of a river basin jointly shaped the high NO3- levels in the almost undisturbed river.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.