认知能力下降和痴呆症背景下的社会健康评估工具:系统性综述。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387192
Janissa Altona, Henrik Wiegelmann, Marta Lenart-Bulga, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Eline Verspoor, Imke Seifert, Julia Misonow, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Rabih Chattat, Yun-Hee Jeon, Esme Moniz-Cook, Martina Roes, Marieke Perry, Karin Wolf-Ostermann
{"title":"认知能力下降和痴呆症背景下的社会健康评估工具:系统性综述。","authors":"Janissa Altona, Henrik Wiegelmann, Marta Lenart-Bulga, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Eline Verspoor, Imke Seifert, Julia Misonow, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Rabih Chattat, Yun-Hee Jeon, Esme Moniz-Cook, Martina Roes, Marieke Perry, Karin Wolf-Ostermann","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of social health has recently received increasing attention in dementia research. Various notions of what social health is and how it can be measured are circulating. They may pose challenges for comparing results and interpreting them for the development of interventions. This systematic review aims to classify existing instruments that measure various domains of social health. To achieve this, we applied a new multidimensional framework consisting of six key domains of social health. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023. A total of 227 studies (longitudinal, case-control, and cross-sectional cohort studies) with 102 single instruments were included. The search terms were as follows: (1) dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment); (2) social health markers (i.e., decision-making, social participation, loneliness); and (3) instruments (i.e., tools, measures). The instruments are mainly self-reported, and the number of items ranges from 3 to 126. Despite the wide array of instruments available, most focus on individual domains of social health. We recommend the development of more conceptually robust instruments that can comprehensively evaluate psychosocial interventions and adequately capture all domains of social health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1387192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments for assessing social health in the context of cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Janissa Altona, Henrik Wiegelmann, Marta Lenart-Bulga, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Eline Verspoor, Imke Seifert, Julia Misonow, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Rabih Chattat, Yun-Hee Jeon, Esme Moniz-Cook, Martina Roes, Marieke Perry, Karin Wolf-Ostermann\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of social health has recently received increasing attention in dementia research. Various notions of what social health is and how it can be measured are circulating. They may pose challenges for comparing results and interpreting them for the development of interventions. This systematic review aims to classify existing instruments that measure various domains of social health. To achieve this, we applied a new multidimensional framework consisting of six key domains of social health. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023. A total of 227 studies (longitudinal, case-control, and cross-sectional cohort studies) with 102 single instruments were included. The search terms were as follows: (1) dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment); (2) social health markers (i.e., decision-making, social participation, loneliness); and (3) instruments (i.e., tools, measures). The instruments are mainly self-reported, and the number of items ranges from 3 to 126. Despite the wide array of instruments available, most focus on individual domains of social health. We recommend the development of more conceptually robust instruments that can comprehensively evaluate psychosocial interventions and adequately capture all domains of social health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1387192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,社会健康的概念在痴呆症研究中受到越来越多的关注。关于什么是社会健康以及如何衡量社会健康的各种概念都在流传。它们可能会给比较结果和解释结果以制定干预措施带来挑战。本系统性综述旨在对衡量社会健康各个领域的现有工具进行分类。为此,我们采用了一个新的多维框架,由社会健康的六个关键领域组成。我们按照 PRISMA 2020 指南进行了系统性综述。我们检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、PsychINFO 和 CINAHL 中 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月间发表的研究。共纳入了 227 项研究(纵向、病例对照和横断面队列研究)和 102 种单一工具。检索词如下(1) 痴呆(即阿尔茨海默氏症、认知障碍);(2) 社会健康指标(即决策、社会参与、孤独);(3) 工具(即工具、测量)。这些工具主要是自我报告,项目数量从 3 个到 126 个不等。尽管现有的工具种类繁多,但大多数都侧重于社会健康的个别领域。我们建议开发概念更强的工具,以全面评估社会心理干预措施,并充分捕捉社会健康的所有领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Instruments for assessing social health in the context of cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review.

The concept of social health has recently received increasing attention in dementia research. Various notions of what social health is and how it can be measured are circulating. They may pose challenges for comparing results and interpreting them for the development of interventions. This systematic review aims to classify existing instruments that measure various domains of social health. To achieve this, we applied a new multidimensional framework consisting of six key domains of social health. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023. A total of 227 studies (longitudinal, case-control, and cross-sectional cohort studies) with 102 single instruments were included. The search terms were as follows: (1) dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment); (2) social health markers (i.e., decision-making, social participation, loneliness); and (3) instruments (i.e., tools, measures). The instruments are mainly self-reported, and the number of items ranges from 3 to 126. Despite the wide array of instruments available, most focus on individual domains of social health. We recommend the development of more conceptually robust instruments that can comprehensively evaluate psychosocial interventions and adequately capture all domains of social health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Do early-life circumstances predict late-life suicidal ideation? Evidence from SHARE data using machine learning. The ethical aspects of integrating sentiment and emotion analysis in chatbots for depression intervention. Elevated remnant cholesterol and the risk of prevalent major depressive disorder: a nationwide population-based study. Neurofilament light chain plasma levels in major depressive disorder: a brief research report. Unraveling the relationships among pandemic fear, cyberchondria, and alexithymia after China's exit from the zero-COVID policy: insights from a multi-center network analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1