实体器官移植中的替代性肺囊虫肺炎预防疗法。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/tid.14410
Kevin D He, Linh Nguyen, Maxwell Norris, Gregory Malat, Stephanie Witek, Chelsea Sammons, Abigail Forte, Tamara Claridge, Jennifer Trofe Clark, Emily Blumberg
{"title":"实体器官移植中的替代性肺囊虫肺炎预防疗法。","authors":"Kevin D He, Linh Nguyen, Maxwell Norris, Gregory Malat, Stephanie Witek, Chelsea Sammons, Abigail Forte, Tamara Claridge, Jennifer Trofe Clark, Emily Blumberg","doi":"10.1111/tid.14410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite limited data supporting use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, atovaquone and dapsone are often used as alternatives to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study describes a multi-organ program's experience with alternative PJP prophylaxis. Adult SOT recipients transplanted November 13, 2020 to November 13, 2022 who received non-TMP-SMX PJP prophylaxis and had > 1 year follow-up were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 953 SOTs performed, 333 (34.9%) recipients received alternative PJP prophylaxis (319 [95.8%] atovaquone and 14 [4.2%] dapsone). Alternative prophylaxis was initiated in 76 (22.8%) recipients without starting TMP-SMX, mostly due to sulfa allergy (62, 81.6%). In 257 recipients who started TMP-SMX, common reasons for switching to alternatives were hyperkalemia (105, 40.9%) and leukopenia (77, 30.0%). While 79.8% of recipients had these adverse effects resolve, only 27.3% resumed TMP-SMX. Tolerance was high after resumption (85.7%). Barriers to accessing alternative prophylaxis included cost (25, 7.5%) and prior authorizations (26, 7.8%). There was one case of severe disseminated toxoplasmosis, one case of Nocardia infection, and no cases of PJP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alternative PJP prophylaxis carries risk of breakthrough infection and barriers to initiation. Since most recovered from adverse effects of TMP-SMX and tolerated resumption, providers should re-trial TMP-SMX when feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplants.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin D He, Linh Nguyen, Maxwell Norris, Gregory Malat, Stephanie Witek, Chelsea Sammons, Abigail Forte, Tamara Claridge, Jennifer Trofe Clark, Emily Blumberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite limited data supporting use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, atovaquone and dapsone are often used as alternatives to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study describes a multi-organ program's experience with alternative PJP prophylaxis. Adult SOT recipients transplanted November 13, 2020 to November 13, 2022 who received non-TMP-SMX PJP prophylaxis and had > 1 year follow-up were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 953 SOTs performed, 333 (34.9%) recipients received alternative PJP prophylaxis (319 [95.8%] atovaquone and 14 [4.2%] dapsone). Alternative prophylaxis was initiated in 76 (22.8%) recipients without starting TMP-SMX, mostly due to sulfa allergy (62, 81.6%). In 257 recipients who started TMP-SMX, common reasons for switching to alternatives were hyperkalemia (105, 40.9%) and leukopenia (77, 30.0%). While 79.8% of recipients had these adverse effects resolve, only 27.3% resumed TMP-SMX. Tolerance was high after resumption (85.7%). Barriers to accessing alternative prophylaxis included cost (25, 7.5%) and prior authorizations (26, 7.8%). There was one case of severe disseminated toxoplasmosis, one case of Nocardia infection, and no cases of PJP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alternative PJP prophylaxis carries risk of breakthrough infection and barriers to initiation. Since most recovered from adverse effects of TMP-SMX and tolerated resumption, providers should re-trial TMP-SMX when feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管支持在实体器官移植(SOT)受者中使用的数据有限,但阿托伐醌和达帕酮经常被用作三甲双胍-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)的替代药物,用于预防肺孢子菌肺炎(PJP):这项单中心、回顾性队列研究描述了一个多器官项目使用替代性 PJP 预防疗法的经验。研究纳入了 2020 年 11 月 13 日至 2022 年 11 月 13 日接受非 TMP-SMX PJP 预防性治疗且随访时间超过 1 年的成人 SOT 受者:在953例SOT中,333例(34.9%)接受了替代性PJP预防治疗(319例[95.8%]阿托伐醌和14例[4.2%]达哌酮)。有 76 名受试者(22.8%)在未开始使用 TMP-SMX 的情况下接受了替代性预防治疗,其中大部分是因为磺胺过敏(62 人,81.6%)。在 257 名开始使用 TMP-SMX 的受试者中,改用替代药物的常见原因是高钾血症(105 人,40.9%)和白细胞减少症(77 人,30.0%)。虽然 79.8% 的受试者的这些不良反应得到了缓解,但只有 27.3% 的受试者恢复了 TMP-SMX。恢复服用后,耐受性很高(85.7%)。获得替代预防药物的障碍包括费用(25 例,7.5%)和事先授权(26 例,7.8%)。有一例严重的播散性弓形虫病,一例诺卡氏菌感染,但没有 PJP 病例:结论:替代性 PJP 预防疗法存在突破性感染的风险和启动障碍。由于大多数患者已从 TMP-SMX 的不良反应中恢复并能耐受恢复治疗,因此医疗服务提供者应在可行的情况下重新试用 TMP-SMX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplants.

Background: Despite limited data supporting use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, atovaquone and dapsone are often used as alternatives to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study describes a multi-organ program's experience with alternative PJP prophylaxis. Adult SOT recipients transplanted November 13, 2020 to November 13, 2022 who received non-TMP-SMX PJP prophylaxis and had > 1 year follow-up were included.

Results: Among 953 SOTs performed, 333 (34.9%) recipients received alternative PJP prophylaxis (319 [95.8%] atovaquone and 14 [4.2%] dapsone). Alternative prophylaxis was initiated in 76 (22.8%) recipients without starting TMP-SMX, mostly due to sulfa allergy (62, 81.6%). In 257 recipients who started TMP-SMX, common reasons for switching to alternatives were hyperkalemia (105, 40.9%) and leukopenia (77, 30.0%). While 79.8% of recipients had these adverse effects resolve, only 27.3% resumed TMP-SMX. Tolerance was high after resumption (85.7%). Barriers to accessing alternative prophylaxis included cost (25, 7.5%) and prior authorizations (26, 7.8%). There was one case of severe disseminated toxoplasmosis, one case of Nocardia infection, and no cases of PJP.

Conclusion: Alternative PJP prophylaxis carries risk of breakthrough infection and barriers to initiation. Since most recovered from adverse effects of TMP-SMX and tolerated resumption, providers should re-trial TMP-SMX when feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
期刊最新文献
A First Case of Bacterial Pericarditis Due to Campylobacter fetus Infection in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Disparities in Access to Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High-Risk African American Kidney Transplant Patients. Presentation and Outcomes of Histoplasmosis in Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study. Relationship Between Body Weight and Leukopenia in Non-Kidney Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Normal Renal Function Who Are Receiving Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis. Severe Outcomes of Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1