日本对淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌患者进行淋巴瘤激酶抑制剂治疗后的免疫疗法。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s11523-024-01116-2
Yuki Shimomura, Megumi Mizutani, Hisako Yoshida, Yasutaka Ihara, Ayumi Shintani
{"title":"日本对淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌患者进行淋巴瘤激酶抑制剂治疗后的免疫疗法。","authors":"Yuki Shimomura, Megumi Mizutani, Hisako Yoshida, Yasutaka Ihara, Ayumi Shintani","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01116-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) are the effective initial treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients experience resistance to ALKis, leading to the need for alternative therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard NSCLC treatment. On the other hand, their efficacy remains unclear for ALK-positive NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to describe the treatment patterns and treatment outcomes for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC receiving later-line ICI treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used claims data from Japanese acute care hospitals and included patients with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10), code: C34) diagnosed between 1 December 2015 and 31 January 2023. We extracted patients who received ALKis as first-line therapy and subsequent lines of treatment. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns and durations were descriptively summarized. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICIs was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 478 patients who received ALKi as first-line treatment, 30 received ICIs, 249 ALKis, and 154 non-ICI/ALKi therapy as second-line treatment. Most patient characteristics showed no differences among the groups. ICIs were more likely to be administered to patients who underwent shorter durations of ALKi treatment. The median TTD for ICIs was 66 days, with a 1 year TTD rate of 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the rarity of ALK-positive NSCLC, this study contributes to add evidence through an expanded database and increased sample size, supporting previous suggestions that ICIs have limited effectiveness in patients positive for ALK.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunotherapy Following Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase‑Positive Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Shimomura, Megumi Mizutani, Hisako Yoshida, Yasutaka Ihara, Ayumi Shintani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11523-024-01116-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) are the effective initial treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients experience resistance to ALKis, leading to the need for alternative therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard NSCLC treatment. On the other hand, their efficacy remains unclear for ALK-positive NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to describe the treatment patterns and treatment outcomes for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC receiving later-line ICI treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used claims data from Japanese acute care hospitals and included patients with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10), code: C34) diagnosed between 1 December 2015 and 31 January 2023. We extracted patients who received ALKis as first-line therapy and subsequent lines of treatment. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns and durations were descriptively summarized. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICIs was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 478 patients who received ALKi as first-line treatment, 30 received ICIs, 249 ALKis, and 154 non-ICI/ALKi therapy as second-line treatment. Most patient characteristics showed no differences among the groups. ICIs were more likely to be administered to patients who underwent shorter durations of ALKi treatment. The median TTD for ICIs was 66 days, with a 1 year TTD rate of 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the rarity of ALK-positive NSCLC, this study contributes to add evidence through an expanded database and increased sample size, supporting previous suggestions that ICIs have limited effectiveness in patients positive for ALK.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"171-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01116-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01116-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然无性淋巴瘤激酶抑制剂(ALKis)是治疗无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的有效初始疗法,但大多数患者对ALKis产生耐药性,因此需要替代疗法。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是一种标准的 NSCLC 治疗方法。另一方面,它们对ALK阳性NSCLC的疗效仍不明确:我们旨在描述接受 ICI 后线治疗的 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 患者的治疗模式和治疗效果:这项回顾性队列研究使用了日本急诊医院的理赔数据,纳入了在 12 月 1 日之后确诊的肺癌患者(国际疾病分类第 10 版 (ICD-10),代码:C34):C34)患者。我们提取了接受 ALKis 作为一线治疗的患者及其后续治疗方案。我们对患者特征、治疗模式和持续时间进行了描述性总结。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计值对 ICIs 治疗终止时间(TTD)进行了研究:结果:在478名接受ALKi一线治疗的患者中,30人接受了ICIs,249人接受了ALKis,154人接受了非ICI/ALKi疗法作为二线治疗。各组患者的大多数特征没有差异。接受ALKi治疗时间较短的患者更有可能使用ICIs。ICIs的中位TTD为66天,1年TTD率为13%:鉴于ALK阳性NSCLC的罕见性,本研究通过扩大数据库和增加样本量来增加证据,支持了之前关于ICIs对ALK阳性患者疗效有限的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immunotherapy Following Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase‑Positive Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan.

Background: Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) are the effective initial treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients experience resistance to ALKis, leading to the need for alternative therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard NSCLC treatment. On the other hand, their efficacy remains unclear for ALK-positive NSCLC.

Objective: We aim to describe the treatment patterns and treatment outcomes for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC receiving later-line ICI treatment.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used claims data from Japanese acute care hospitals and included patients with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10), code: C34) diagnosed between 1 December 2015 and 31 January 2023. We extracted patients who received ALKis as first-line therapy and subsequent lines of treatment. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns and durations were descriptively summarized. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICIs was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: Of 478 patients who received ALKi as first-line treatment, 30 received ICIs, 249 ALKis, and 154 non-ICI/ALKi therapy as second-line treatment. Most patient characteristics showed no differences among the groups. ICIs were more likely to be administered to patients who underwent shorter durations of ALKi treatment. The median TTD for ICIs was 66 days, with a 1 year TTD rate of 13%.

Conclusions: Given the rarity of ALK-positive NSCLC, this study contributes to add evidence through an expanded database and increased sample size, supporting previous suggestions that ICIs have limited effectiveness in patients positive for ALK.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
期刊最新文献
Checkpoint Inhibition Prior to Stem Cell Transplantation Increases the Risk of Inflammatory Adverse Events. The User's Guide to Amivantamab. Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Real-World Experience at Hospitals in Spain. Bosutinib for the Treatment of CML-Using it Safely: a Podcast.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1