利多卡因、苯佐卡因和 EMLA 局部麻醉剂减轻学龄儿童下牙槽神经阻滞疼痛的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8
Mawia Karkoutly, Laila Alatassi, Lilian Azrak, Nada Bshara
{"title":"利多卡因、苯佐卡因和 EMLA 局部麻醉剂减轻学龄儿童下牙槽神经阻滞疼痛的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Mawia Karkoutly, Laila Alatassi, Lilian Azrak, Nada Bshara","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5% EMLA cream and 8% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) compared with 20% Benzocaine in children aged 6-10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a triple-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled trial with three arms. 45 children were randomly assigned into 3 groups. Group 1: control group, 20% benzocaine gel (n = 15). Group 2: 8% lidocaine gel (n = 15). Group 3: 5% EMLA cream (n = 15). Each topical anesthetic was applied in an amount of 0.3 mL using a cotton swab for 2 min, followed by IANB administration. The following primary outcome measures were considered: pulse rate, the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain assessment scale, and the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of the FLACC behavioral pain assessment scale in group 2 (2.20 ± 1.86) was slightly higher, but this result was not statistically significant p = (0.806). Regarding the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale scores, no statistically significant difference was noted between the study groups p = (0.593). After IANB administration, the mean pulse rate was higher in group 3 (102.40 ± 14.28). However, this difference was not statistically significant p = (0.351). In addition, the mean change of the pulse rate from the baseline to this time point was not statistically significant p = (0.638), indicating a smaller physiologic response to the painful stimulus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>8% lidocaine gel was not superior to 20% benzocaine nor 5% EMLA in reducing pain during IANB administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of topical anesthetics of lidocaine, benzocaine, and EMLA in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in schoolchildren: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mawia Karkoutly, Laila Alatassi, Lilian Azrak, Nada Bshara\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5% EMLA cream and 8% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) compared with 20% Benzocaine in children aged 6-10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a triple-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled trial with three arms. 45 children were randomly assigned into 3 groups. Group 1: control group, 20% benzocaine gel (n = 15). Group 2: 8% lidocaine gel (n = 15). Group 3: 5% EMLA cream (n = 15). Each topical anesthetic was applied in an amount of 0.3 mL using a cotton swab for 2 min, followed by IANB administration. The following primary outcome measures were considered: pulse rate, the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain assessment scale, and the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of the FLACC behavioral pain assessment scale in group 2 (2.20 ± 1.86) was slightly higher, but this result was not statistically significant p = (0.806). Regarding the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale scores, no statistically significant difference was noted between the study groups p = (0.593). After IANB administration, the mean pulse rate was higher in group 3 (102.40 ± 14.28). However, this difference was not statistically significant p = (0.351). In addition, the mean change of the pulse rate from the baseline to this time point was not statistically significant p = (0.638), indicating a smaller physiologic response to the painful stimulus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>8% lidocaine gel was not superior to 20% benzocaine nor 5% EMLA in reducing pain during IANB administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BDJ Open\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BDJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估5% EMLA乳膏和8%利多卡因凝胶与20%苯佐卡因相比在减轻6-10岁儿童下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)过程中疼痛的效果:这是一项三盲、随机、平行组、主动对照试验。45 名儿童被随机分为 3 组。第一组:对照组,20% 苯佐卡因凝胶(n = 15)。第 2 组:8% 利多卡因凝胶(n = 15)。第 3 组:5% EMLA 乳膏(n = 15)。每种局部麻醉剂用棉签蘸取 0.3 毫升,持续 2 分钟,然后注射 IANB。主要结果指标包括:脉搏、脸部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(FLACC)行为疼痛评估量表和 Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表:结果:第 2 组的 FLACC 行为疼痛评估量表平均分(2.20 ± 1.86)略高,但这一结果在统计学上并不显著,P = (0.806)。至于 Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表的得分,研究组之间的差异无统计学意义 p = (0.593)。使用 IANB 后,第 3 组的平均脉搏率较高(102.40 ± 14.28)。然而,这一差异并无统计学意义 p = (0.351)。结论:8% 利多卡因凝胶在减轻 IANB 给药期间的疼痛方面并不优于 20% 苯佐卡因或 5% EMLA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of topical anesthetics of lidocaine, benzocaine, and EMLA in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in schoolchildren: a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5% EMLA cream and 8% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) compared with 20% Benzocaine in children aged 6-10 years.

Materials and methods: This was a triple-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled trial with three arms. 45 children were randomly assigned into 3 groups. Group 1: control group, 20% benzocaine gel (n = 15). Group 2: 8% lidocaine gel (n = 15). Group 3: 5% EMLA cream (n = 15). Each topical anesthetic was applied in an amount of 0.3 mL using a cotton swab for 2 min, followed by IANB administration. The following primary outcome measures were considered: pulse rate, the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain assessment scale, and the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale.

Results: The mean score of the FLACC behavioral pain assessment scale in group 2 (2.20 ± 1.86) was slightly higher, but this result was not statistically significant p = (0.806). Regarding the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale scores, no statistically significant difference was noted between the study groups p = (0.593). After IANB administration, the mean pulse rate was higher in group 3 (102.40 ± 14.28). However, this difference was not statistically significant p = (0.351). In addition, the mean change of the pulse rate from the baseline to this time point was not statistically significant p = (0.638), indicating a smaller physiologic response to the painful stimulus.

Conclusion: 8% lidocaine gel was not superior to 20% benzocaine nor 5% EMLA in reducing pain during IANB administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of mixing of europium oxide in resin composites on the fluorescence characteristics and mechanical properties. Regenerative potential of concentrated growth factor compared to platelet-rich fibrin in treatment of necrotic mature teeth: a randomized clinical trial. In-vitro accuracy of the virtual patient model with maxillomandibular relationship at centric occlusion using 3D-printed customized transfer key. Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review. Influence of two different printing methods on the accuracy of full-guided implant insertion - a laboratory study in undergraduate dental students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1