Kyung-Jin Park, Viktor Löffler, Sandra Riemekasten, Dirk Ziebolz, Hartmut Schneider, Rainer Haak
{"title":"牙管脱粘对体外牙釉质表面的影响:光学相干断层扫描评估。","authors":"Kyung-Jin Park, Viktor Löffler, Sandra Riemekasten, Dirk Ziebolz, Hartmut Schneider, Rainer Haak","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00561-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In vitro evaluation of the morphology of the enamel surface before bonding metal tubes and after debonding using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 40 extracted caries-free human molars without defects were selected and cleaned. The tooth surfaces were imaged by light microscopy and SD-OCT prior to the placement of metal tubes (Titanium Orthos; Ormco, Brea, CA, USA). The metal tubes were bonded to the teeth using four adhesive systems: group 1) BrackFix Primer SE with BrackFix adhesive, group 2) BrackFix Primer with BrackFix adhesive (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), group 3) Transbond Plus SE Primer with Transbond XT adhesive, group 4) Transbond XT Primer with Transbond XT adhesive (reference, 3M Deutschland, Neuss, Germany). After tube removal, the bonded areas were imaged by light microscopy and/or OCT and evaluated according to the following four criteria: (1) depth of cohesive enamel defect, (2) enamel cracks, (3) adhesive residue after tube removal, and (4) adhesive residues after polishing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the groups had enamel defects or enamel cracks. Group 1 showed significantly less adhesive residue after tube removal than the other groups (p<sub>i</sub> ≤ 0.014). There were no significant differences between the groups for adhesive residues after polishing (p<sub>i</sub> ≥ 0.628). Adhesive residues, if present, were only detectable by OCT and covered less than 1% of the enamel surfaces evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tube removal did not cause clinically relevant enamel damage such as chipping or cracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of tube debonding on the enamel surface in vitro : Evaluation with optical coherence tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Jin Park, Viktor Löffler, Sandra Riemekasten, Dirk Ziebolz, Hartmut Schneider, Rainer Haak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00056-024-00561-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In vitro evaluation of the morphology of the enamel surface before bonding metal tubes and after debonding using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 40 extracted caries-free human molars without defects were selected and cleaned. The tooth surfaces were imaged by light microscopy and SD-OCT prior to the placement of metal tubes (Titanium Orthos; Ormco, Brea, CA, USA). The metal tubes were bonded to the teeth using four adhesive systems: group 1) BrackFix Primer SE with BrackFix adhesive, group 2) BrackFix Primer with BrackFix adhesive (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), group 3) Transbond Plus SE Primer with Transbond XT adhesive, group 4) Transbond XT Primer with Transbond XT adhesive (reference, 3M Deutschland, Neuss, Germany). After tube removal, the bonded areas were imaged by light microscopy and/or OCT and evaluated according to the following four criteria: (1) depth of cohesive enamel defect, (2) enamel cracks, (3) adhesive residue after tube removal, and (4) adhesive residues after polishing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the groups had enamel defects or enamel cracks. Group 1 showed significantly less adhesive residue after tube removal than the other groups (p<sub>i</sub> ≤ 0.014). There were no significant differences between the groups for adhesive residues after polishing (p<sub>i</sub> ≥ 0.628). Adhesive residues, if present, were only detectable by OCT and covered less than 1% of the enamel surfaces evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tube removal did not cause clinically relevant enamel damage such as chipping or cracking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00561-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00561-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和光学显微镜对粘结金属管前和脱粘后的釉质表面形态进行体外评估:方法:选取 40 颗无龋齿、无缺损的人类臼齿并进行清洁。在放置金属管(Titanium Orthos; Ormco, Brea, CA, USA)之前,用光学显微镜和 SD-OCT 对牙齿表面进行成像。使用四种粘合剂系统将金属管粘合到牙齿上:第 1 组:BrackFix Primer SE 与 BrackFix 粘合剂;第 2 组:BrackFix Primer 与 BrackFix 粘合剂(VOCO,德国库克斯港);第 3 组:Transbond Plus SE Primer 与 Transbond XT 粘合剂;第 4 组:Transbond XT Primer 与 Transbond XT 粘合剂(参考资料,3M Deutschland,德国诺伊斯)。拔管后,用光学显微镜和/或 OCT 对粘合区域进行成像,并根据以下四个标准进行评估:(1) 珐琅质粘连缺损深度;(2) 珐琅质裂纹;(3) 拔管后的粘合剂残留;(4) 抛光后的粘合剂残留:各组均无釉质缺损或釉质裂纹。第 1 组拔管后的粘合剂残留量明显少于其他组(pi ≤ 0.014)。各组在抛光后的粘合剂残留量无明显差异(pi ≥ 0.628)。如果存在粘合剂残留,也只能通过 OCT 检测到,且覆盖的釉面小于评估釉面的 1%:拔管不会造成临床相关的珐琅质损伤,如崩裂或开裂。
Effect of tube debonding on the enamel surface in vitro : Evaluation with optical coherence tomography.
Objective: In vitro evaluation of the morphology of the enamel surface before bonding metal tubes and after debonding using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and light microscopy.
Methods: In all, 40 extracted caries-free human molars without defects were selected and cleaned. The tooth surfaces were imaged by light microscopy and SD-OCT prior to the placement of metal tubes (Titanium Orthos; Ormco, Brea, CA, USA). The metal tubes were bonded to the teeth using four adhesive systems: group 1) BrackFix Primer SE with BrackFix adhesive, group 2) BrackFix Primer with BrackFix adhesive (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), group 3) Transbond Plus SE Primer with Transbond XT adhesive, group 4) Transbond XT Primer with Transbond XT adhesive (reference, 3M Deutschland, Neuss, Germany). After tube removal, the bonded areas were imaged by light microscopy and/or OCT and evaluated according to the following four criteria: (1) depth of cohesive enamel defect, (2) enamel cracks, (3) adhesive residue after tube removal, and (4) adhesive residues after polishing.
Results: None of the groups had enamel defects or enamel cracks. Group 1 showed significantly less adhesive residue after tube removal than the other groups (pi ≤ 0.014). There were no significant differences between the groups for adhesive residues after polishing (pi ≥ 0.628). Adhesive residues, if present, were only detectable by OCT and covered less than 1% of the enamel surfaces evaluated.
Conclusion: Tube removal did not cause clinically relevant enamel damage such as chipping or cracking.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.