15%5-aminolevulinic acid 和 10%5-aminolevulinic acid 光动力疗法治疗寻常痤疮的比较:分面随机试验研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.5114/ada.2024.144417
Natalia Brzezińska, Barbara Bulińska, Natalia Zawadzka, Gustaw Roter, Aneta Szczerkowska-Dobosz
{"title":"15%5-aminolevulinic acid 和 10%5-aminolevulinic acid 光动力疗法治疗寻常痤疮的比较:分面随机试验研究。","authors":"Natalia Brzezińska, Barbara Bulińska, Natalia Zawadzka, Gustaw Roter, Aneta Szczerkowska-Dobosz","doi":"10.5114/ada.2024.144417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disorder, driving the ongoing search for innovative treatment modalities. While numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in managing acne vulgaris, there remains a lack of clear guidlines regarding optimal treatment parameters.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of 10% concentration 5-aminolevulinic acid-(ALA) in comparison to 15% ALA PDT for treating facial acne vulgaris.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial was conducted on 25 patients with moderate to severe acne (<i>Leeds grades 2-4</i>). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups with different ALA concentrations applied on one cheek, while a placebo was applied on the other side. After a 1.5-hour incubation, illumination with 633 nm red light from a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamp (96 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) was performed in three sessions with 7-10 days' intervals. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the lesion reduction rate based on lesion counts before the study, after each session, and at 4 and 8 weeks after the last session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both 15% and 10% ALA-PDT treatments demonstrated significant reductions in inflammatory acne lesion counts compared to the placebo: 10% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 27.36% versus 12.64% for the placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.04), while 15% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 40.45% compared to 13.41% (<i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ALA-PDT and placebo in treating non-inflammatory lesions. Additionally, there was no difference between the effectiveness of 10% and 15% ALA in reducing any type of acne lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ALA-PDT is effective in treating acne vulgaris. However, ALA-PDT provides an advantage over red light only for inflammatory acne lesions. The study indicates that higher concentrations of ALA do not result in more significant reductions in acne lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54595,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","volume":"41 5","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 15% 5-aminolevulinic acid and 10% 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Brzezińska, Barbara Bulińska, Natalia Zawadzka, Gustaw Roter, Aneta Szczerkowska-Dobosz\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ada.2024.144417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disorder, driving the ongoing search for innovative treatment modalities. While numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in managing acne vulgaris, there remains a lack of clear guidlines regarding optimal treatment parameters.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of 10% concentration 5-aminolevulinic acid-(ALA) in comparison to 15% ALA PDT for treating facial acne vulgaris.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial was conducted on 25 patients with moderate to severe acne (<i>Leeds grades 2-4</i>). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups with different ALA concentrations applied on one cheek, while a placebo was applied on the other side. After a 1.5-hour incubation, illumination with 633 nm red light from a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamp (96 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) was performed in three sessions with 7-10 days' intervals. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the lesion reduction rate based on lesion counts before the study, after each session, and at 4 and 8 weeks after the last session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both 15% and 10% ALA-PDT treatments demonstrated significant reductions in inflammatory acne lesion counts compared to the placebo: 10% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 27.36% versus 12.64% for the placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.04), while 15% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 40.45% compared to 13.41% (<i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ALA-PDT and placebo in treating non-inflammatory lesions. Additionally, there was no difference between the effectiveness of 10% and 15% ALA in reducing any type of acne lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ALA-PDT is effective in treating acne vulgaris. However, ALA-PDT provides an advantage over red light only for inflammatory acne lesions. The study indicates that higher concentrations of ALA do not result in more significant reductions in acne lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"479-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2024.144417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2024.144417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:寻常型痤疮是一种高发皮肤疾病,促使人们不断寻求创新的治疗方法。目的:评估10%浓度的5-氨基乙酰丙酸(ALA)与15%浓度的ALA光动力疗法治疗面部寻常痤疮的有效性和安全性:对25名中重度痤疮(利兹2-4级)患者进行了随机、双盲、分面临床试验。患者被随机分配到两组,一组脸颊涂抹不同浓度的 ALA,另一组脸颊涂抹安慰剂。经过 1.5 小时的培养后,使用发光二极管(LED)灯(96 焦耳/平方厘米)发出的 633 纳米红光进行照射,分三次进行,每次间隔 7-10 天。根据研究前、每次治疗后以及最后一次治疗后 4 周和 8 周的皮损计数,以皮损减少率评估治疗效果:与安慰剂相比,15%和10%的ALA-PDT治疗都能显著减少炎性痤疮皮损数量:10%的ALA-PDT减少了27.36%,而安慰剂减少了12.64%(p = 0.04);15%的ALA-PDT减少了40.45%,而安慰剂减少了13.41%(p < 0.01)。然而,在治疗非炎症性病变方面,ALA-PDT 和安慰剂没有明显差异。此外,10%和15%的ALA在减少任何类型的痤疮皮损方面的效果也没有差异:结论:ALA-PDT 能有效治疗寻常型痤疮。结论:ALA-PDT 对治疗寻常型痤疮有效,但与红光相比,ALA-PDT 只对炎症性痤疮皮损有效。研究表明,更高浓度的 ALA 并不能更显著地减少痤疮皮损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of 15% 5-aminolevulinic acid and 10% 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized pilot study.

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disorder, driving the ongoing search for innovative treatment modalities. While numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in managing acne vulgaris, there remains a lack of clear guidlines regarding optimal treatment parameters.

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of 10% concentration 5-aminolevulinic acid-(ALA) in comparison to 15% ALA PDT for treating facial acne vulgaris.

Material and methods: A randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial was conducted on 25 patients with moderate to severe acne (Leeds grades 2-4). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups with different ALA concentrations applied on one cheek, while a placebo was applied on the other side. After a 1.5-hour incubation, illumination with 633 nm red light from a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamp (96 J/cm2) was performed in three sessions with 7-10 days' intervals. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the lesion reduction rate based on lesion counts before the study, after each session, and at 4 and 8 weeks after the last session.

Results: Both 15% and 10% ALA-PDT treatments demonstrated significant reductions in inflammatory acne lesion counts compared to the placebo: 10% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 27.36% versus 12.64% for the placebo (p = 0.04), while 15% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 40.45% compared to 13.41% (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ALA-PDT and placebo in treating non-inflammatory lesions. Additionally, there was no difference between the effectiveness of 10% and 15% ALA in reducing any type of acne lesions.

Conclusions: ALA-PDT is effective in treating acne vulgaris. However, ALA-PDT provides an advantage over red light only for inflammatory acne lesions. The study indicates that higher concentrations of ALA do not result in more significant reductions in acne lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii is a bimonthly aimed at allergologists and dermatologists.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the correlation between the levels of HIF-1α and miR-199a in lesions and the psoriasis severity index. Association of psoriasis disease with physical activity and exercise: systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of the expression of Bcl-2 and Ki-67 prognostic markers and apoptotic index with biological behaviour in aggressive and non-aggressive non-melanoma eyelid skin cancer. Changes and correlation of serum levels of interleukins 33, 15, 4, and interferon γ in children with bronchial asthma at different periods. A case of acquired reactive perforating collagenosis after COVID-19 infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1