Nivolumab联合Ipilimumab治疗微卫星不稳定性高的转移性结直肠癌

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2402141
Thierry Andre, Elena Elez, Eric Van Cutsem, Lars Henrik Jensen, Jaafar Bennouna, Guillermo Mendez, Michael Schenker, Christelle de la Fouchardiere, Maria Luisa Limon, Takayuki Yoshino, Jin Li, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Jose Luis Manzano Mozo, Giampaolo Tortora, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Laetitia Dahan, Myriam Chalabi, Rohit Joshi, Eray Goekkurt, Maria Ignez Braghiroli, Timucin Cil, Elvis Cela, Tian Chen, Ming Lei, Matthew Dixon, Sandzhar Abdullaev, Sara Lonardi
{"title":"Nivolumab联合Ipilimumab治疗微卫星不稳定性高的转移性结直肠癌","authors":"Thierry Andre, Elena Elez, Eric Van Cutsem, Lars Henrik Jensen, Jaafar Bennouna, Guillermo Mendez, Michael Schenker, Christelle de la Fouchardiere, Maria Luisa Limon, Takayuki Yoshino, Jin Li, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Jose Luis Manzano Mozo, Giampaolo Tortora, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Laetitia Dahan, Myriam Chalabi, Rohit Joshi, Eray Goekkurt, Maria Ignez Braghiroli, Timucin Cil, Elvis Cela, Tian Chen, Ming Lei, Matthew Dixon, Sandzhar Abdullaev, Sara Lonardi","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2402141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer have poor outcomes with standard chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has shown clinical benefit in nonrandomized studies of MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3 open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and MSI-H or dMMR status according to local testing to receive, in a 2:2:1 ratio, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. The dual primary end points, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR status, were progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with nivolumab alone in patients regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. At this prespecified interim analysis, the first primary end point (involving nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 303 patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy; 255 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR tumors. At a median follow-up of 31.5 months (range, 6.1 to 48.4), progression-free survival outcomes (the primary analysis) were significantly better with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy (P<0.001 for the between-group difference in progression-free survival, calculated with the use of a two-sided stratified log-rank test); 24-month progression-free survival was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 79) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with chemotherapy. At 24 months, the restricted mean survival time was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 12.9) longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy, a finding consistent with the primary analysis of progression-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in 48% of the patients in the chemotherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression-free survival was longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 8HW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04008030.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 21","pages":"2014-2026"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Andre, Elena Elez, Eric Van Cutsem, Lars Henrik Jensen, Jaafar Bennouna, Guillermo Mendez, Michael Schenker, Christelle de la Fouchardiere, Maria Luisa Limon, Takayuki Yoshino, Jin Li, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Jose Luis Manzano Mozo, Giampaolo Tortora, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Laetitia Dahan, Myriam Chalabi, Rohit Joshi, Eray Goekkurt, Maria Ignez Braghiroli, Timucin Cil, Elvis Cela, Tian Chen, Ming Lei, Matthew Dixon, Sandzhar Abdullaev, Sara Lonardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2402141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer have poor outcomes with standard chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has shown clinical benefit in nonrandomized studies of MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3 open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and MSI-H or dMMR status according to local testing to receive, in a 2:2:1 ratio, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. The dual primary end points, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR status, were progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with nivolumab alone in patients regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. At this prespecified interim analysis, the first primary end point (involving nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 303 patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy; 255 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR tumors. At a median follow-up of 31.5 months (range, 6.1 to 48.4), progression-free survival outcomes (the primary analysis) were significantly better with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy (P<0.001 for the between-group difference in progression-free survival, calculated with the use of a two-sided stratified log-rank test); 24-month progression-free survival was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 79) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with chemotherapy. At 24 months, the restricted mean survival time was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 12.9) longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy, a finding consistent with the primary analysis of progression-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in 48% of the patients in the chemotherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression-free survival was longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 8HW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04008030.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"391 21\",\"pages\":\"2014-2026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2402141\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2402141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)或错配修复缺陷(dMMR)转移性结直肠癌患者接受标准化疗或不接受靶向治疗的疗效不佳。在针对MSI-H或dMMR转移性结直肠癌的非随机研究中,Nivolumab加伊匹单抗已显示出临床获益:在这项3期开放标签试验中,我们随机分配不可切除或转移性结直肠癌患者,并根据当地检测结果确定其MSI-H或dMMR状态,按照2:2:1的比例让患者接受nivolumab联合伊匹单抗、单用nivolumab或化疗联合或不联合靶向治疗。在中心确诊为MSI-H或dMMR状态的患者中评估的双重主要终点是:与化疗作为一线疗法相比,尼妥珠单抗联合伊匹单抗的无进展生存期;与单用尼妥珠单抗相比,尼妥珠单抗联合伊匹单抗的无进展生存期,无论患者既往是否接受过转移性疾病的系统治疗。在这项预先指定的中期分析中,对第一个主要终点(nivolumab加伊匹单抗与化疗的比较)进行了评估:共有303名既往未接受过转移性疾病系统治疗的患者被随机分配到接受nivolumab加伊匹单抗或化疗;255名患者的肿瘤经中心确诊为MSI-H或dMMR。中位随访31.5个月(6.1至48.4个月),nivolumab联合ipilimumab的无进展生存期(主要分析)明显优于化疗(PConclusions:在既往未接受过MSI-H或dMMR转移性结直肠癌系统治疗的患者中,使用nivolumab加伊匹单抗的无进展生存期长于化疗。(由 Bristol Myers Squibb 和 Ono Pharmaceutical 资助;CheckMate 8HW ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT04008030)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Patients with microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer have poor outcomes with standard chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has shown clinical benefit in nonrandomized studies of MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods: In this phase 3 open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and MSI-H or dMMR status according to local testing to receive, in a 2:2:1 ratio, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. The dual primary end points, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR status, were progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with nivolumab alone in patients regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. At this prespecified interim analysis, the first primary end point (involving nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy) was assessed.

Results: A total of 303 patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy; 255 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR tumors. At a median follow-up of 31.5 months (range, 6.1 to 48.4), progression-free survival outcomes (the primary analysis) were significantly better with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy (P<0.001 for the between-group difference in progression-free survival, calculated with the use of a two-sided stratified log-rank test); 24-month progression-free survival was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 79) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with chemotherapy. At 24 months, the restricted mean survival time was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 12.9) longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy, a finding consistent with the primary analysis of progression-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in 48% of the patients in the chemotherapy group.

Conclusions: Progression-free survival was longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 8HW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04008030.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
NEJM at ESMO - Overall Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple- Negative Breast Cancer. Overall Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. A Case of Vertical Transmission of Oropouche Virus in Brazil. "Target Trial Emulation" for Observational Studies - Potential and Pitfalls. A Good Day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1