评估 Instagram 上耳鼻喉科教育视频的准确性和参与度。

Ogechukwu S Anwaegbu, Michel M Adeniran, Adannaya C Ihediwa, Joshua E Lewis, Shobit D Srivastava, Tyler A Janz, Brian J McKinnon
{"title":"评估 Instagram 上耳鼻喉科教育视频的准确性和参与度。","authors":"Ogechukwu S Anwaegbu, Michel M Adeniran, Adannaya C Ihediwa, Joshua E Lewis, Shobit D Srivastava, Tyler A Janz, Brian J McKinnon","doi":"10.1177/01455613241302518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To examine the accuracy, engagement, and quality of otolaryngology-related educational videos produced by health care providers on Instagram. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search on Instagram was conducted to identify the top 150 video posts using the hashtags #Otolaryngology, #Otolaryngologist, and #ENTeducation, ranging from September 2020 to January 2024. Posts not related to otolaryngology medical education were excluded from analysis. Engagement metrics such as likes, comments, shares, views, and video duration were used to quantify the reach of the content. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials was utilized to evaluate the understandability and actionability of medical educational videos. <b>Results:</b> 54 Instagram videos were analyzed and categorized by content type based on their primary topic-ear (n = 15), nose (n = 20), and throat (n = 19). Overall, 85% of the content was completely accurate, 13% was incomplete/misleading, and 2% was completely inaccurate. The average understandability was high at 89%, and the average actionability was low at 39%. 78% of the videos were created by otolaryngologists, 7% by plastic surgeons, and 15% by other health care providers. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most of the top otolaryngology-related educational content on Instagram was accurate with some misleading and inaccurate content. Although the inaccurate video is small in comparison, the moderate user engagement reveals that even a single inaccurate video can adversely reach and influence many people.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613241302518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Accuracy and Engagement of Otolaryngology Educational Videos on Instagram.\",\"authors\":\"Ogechukwu S Anwaegbu, Michel M Adeniran, Adannaya C Ihediwa, Joshua E Lewis, Shobit D Srivastava, Tyler A Janz, Brian J McKinnon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241302518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To examine the accuracy, engagement, and quality of otolaryngology-related educational videos produced by health care providers on Instagram. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search on Instagram was conducted to identify the top 150 video posts using the hashtags #Otolaryngology, #Otolaryngologist, and #ENTeducation, ranging from September 2020 to January 2024. Posts not related to otolaryngology medical education were excluded from analysis. Engagement metrics such as likes, comments, shares, views, and video duration were used to quantify the reach of the content. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials was utilized to evaluate the understandability and actionability of medical educational videos. <b>Results:</b> 54 Instagram videos were analyzed and categorized by content type based on their primary topic-ear (n = 15), nose (n = 20), and throat (n = 19). Overall, 85% of the content was completely accurate, 13% was incomplete/misleading, and 2% was completely inaccurate. The average understandability was high at 89%, and the average actionability was low at 39%. 78% of the videos were created by otolaryngologists, 7% by plastic surgeons, and 15% by other health care providers. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most of the top otolaryngology-related educational content on Instagram was accurate with some misleading and inaccurate content. Although the inaccurate video is small in comparison, the moderate user engagement reveals that even a single inaccurate video can adversely reach and influence many people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613241302518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241302518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241302518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究医疗服务提供者在 Instagram 上制作的耳鼻喉科相关教育视频的准确性、参与度和质量。方法在 Instagram 上进行系统搜索,找出 2020 年 9 月至 2024 年 1 月期间使用 #耳鼻喉科、#耳鼻喉科医师和 #ENTeducation 标签的前 150 篇视频帖子。与耳鼻喉科医学教育无关的帖子不在分析之列。点赞、评论、分享、浏览量和视频持续时间等参与度指标用于量化内容的传播范围。视听材料患者教育材料评估工具用于评估医学教育视频的可理解性和可操作性。结果对 54 个 Instagram 视频进行了分析,并根据其主要话题按内容类型进行了分类--耳部(15 个)、鼻部(20 个)和喉部(19 个)。总体而言,85% 的内容完全准确,13% 不完整/有误导性,2% 完全不准确。平均可理解度高达 89%,平均可操作性低至 39%。78%的视频由耳鼻喉科医生制作,7%由整形外科医生制作,15%由其他医疗服务提供者制作。结论Instagram上大部分热门耳鼻喉科相关教育内容都是准确的,但也有一些误导性和不准确的内容。虽然相比之下不准确的视频数量较少,但适度的用户参与度揭示了即使是一个不准确的视频也会对许多人产生不利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Accuracy and Engagement of Otolaryngology Educational Videos on Instagram.

Objective: To examine the accuracy, engagement, and quality of otolaryngology-related educational videos produced by health care providers on Instagram. Methods: A systematic search on Instagram was conducted to identify the top 150 video posts using the hashtags #Otolaryngology, #Otolaryngologist, and #ENTeducation, ranging from September 2020 to January 2024. Posts not related to otolaryngology medical education were excluded from analysis. Engagement metrics such as likes, comments, shares, views, and video duration were used to quantify the reach of the content. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials was utilized to evaluate the understandability and actionability of medical educational videos. Results: 54 Instagram videos were analyzed and categorized by content type based on their primary topic-ear (n = 15), nose (n = 20), and throat (n = 19). Overall, 85% of the content was completely accurate, 13% was incomplete/misleading, and 2% was completely inaccurate. The average understandability was high at 89%, and the average actionability was low at 39%. 78% of the videos were created by otolaryngologists, 7% by plastic surgeons, and 15% by other health care providers. Conclusions: Most of the top otolaryngology-related educational content on Instagram was accurate with some misleading and inaccurate content. Although the inaccurate video is small in comparison, the moderate user engagement reveals that even a single inaccurate video can adversely reach and influence many people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Optimal Head Position Following Intratympanic Injection: A Research Based on HRCT Reconstruction. Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Submandibular Gland with Skull Metastasis: A Case Report. A Case of Kimura Disease in the Left Postauricular and Neck Region. A Rare Case of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Palatine Tonsil. Giant Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Retropharyngeal Space: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1