欧洲食用蛤壳吸虫的形态与分子鉴定

Leslie Stout , Guillemine Daffe , Aurélie Chambouvet , Simão Correia , Sarah Culloty , Rosa Freitas , David Iglesias , K. Thomas Jensen , Sandra Joaquim , Sharon Lynch , Luisa Magalhães , Kate Mahony , Shelagh K. Malham , Domitilia Matias , Mélanie Rocroy , David W. Thieltges , Xavier de Montaudouin
{"title":"欧洲食用蛤壳吸虫的形态与分子鉴定","authors":"Leslie Stout ,&nbsp;Guillemine Daffe ,&nbsp;Aurélie Chambouvet ,&nbsp;Simão Correia ,&nbsp;Sarah Culloty ,&nbsp;Rosa Freitas ,&nbsp;David Iglesias ,&nbsp;K. Thomas Jensen ,&nbsp;Sandra Joaquim ,&nbsp;Sharon Lynch ,&nbsp;Luisa Magalhães ,&nbsp;Kate Mahony ,&nbsp;Shelagh K. Malham ,&nbsp;Domitilia Matias ,&nbsp;Mélanie Rocroy ,&nbsp;David W. Thieltges ,&nbsp;Xavier de Montaudouin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.101019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying marine trematode parasites in host tissue can be complicated when there is limited morphological differentiation between species infecting the same host species. This poses a challenge for regular surveys of the parasite communities in species of socio-economic and ecological importance. Our study focused on identifying digenean trematode species infecting the marine bivalve <em>Cerastoderma edule</em> across Europe by comparing morphological and molecular species identification methods. Cockles were sampled from ten locations to observe the trematode parasites under a stereomicroscope (morphological identification) and to isolate individuals for phylogenetic analyses using two gene markers, the small sub-unit ribosomal (18S) RNA gene (SSU rDNA) and the mitochondrial cytochrome <em>c</em> oxidase subunit 1 (cox1). For the first time, we compared both morphological identification and phylogenetic analyses for each of the 13 originally identified species. First, we identified a group of five species for which morphological identification matched molecular results (<em>Bucephalus minimus</em>, <em>Monorchis parvus</em>, <em>Renicola parvicaudatus</em>, <em>Psilostomum brevicolle</em>, <em>Himasthla interrupta</em>). Second, we identified a group of six species for which molecular results revealed either misidentifications or cryptic diversity (<em>Gymnophallus choledochus</em>, <em>Diphterostomum brusinae</em>, <em>Curtuteria arguinae</em>, <em>Himasthla quissetensis</em>, <em>H. elongata</em>, <em>H</em>. <em>continua</em>). Third, our analyses showed that all sequences of two expected species, <em>Gymnophallus minutus</em> and <em>G. fossarum</em>, matched between the two, strongly suggesting that only <em>G. minutus</em> is present in the studied area. Our study clearly demonstrates that molecular tools are necessary to validate the trematode species composition. However, with 17 distinct genetic lineages detected, some of which are not fully identified, future studies are needed to clarify the identity and status (regular <em>vs.</em> accidental infection) of some of these cryptic trematode species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological vs. molecular identification of trematode species infecting the edible cockle Cerastoderma edule across Europe\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Stout ,&nbsp;Guillemine Daffe ,&nbsp;Aurélie Chambouvet ,&nbsp;Simão Correia ,&nbsp;Sarah Culloty ,&nbsp;Rosa Freitas ,&nbsp;David Iglesias ,&nbsp;K. Thomas Jensen ,&nbsp;Sandra Joaquim ,&nbsp;Sharon Lynch ,&nbsp;Luisa Magalhães ,&nbsp;Kate Mahony ,&nbsp;Shelagh K. Malham ,&nbsp;Domitilia Matias ,&nbsp;Mélanie Rocroy ,&nbsp;David W. Thieltges ,&nbsp;Xavier de Montaudouin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.101019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying marine trematode parasites in host tissue can be complicated when there is limited morphological differentiation between species infecting the same host species. This poses a challenge for regular surveys of the parasite communities in species of socio-economic and ecological importance. Our study focused on identifying digenean trematode species infecting the marine bivalve <em>Cerastoderma edule</em> across Europe by comparing morphological and molecular species identification methods. Cockles were sampled from ten locations to observe the trematode parasites under a stereomicroscope (morphological identification) and to isolate individuals for phylogenetic analyses using two gene markers, the small sub-unit ribosomal (18S) RNA gene (SSU rDNA) and the mitochondrial cytochrome <em>c</em> oxidase subunit 1 (cox1). For the first time, we compared both morphological identification and phylogenetic analyses for each of the 13 originally identified species. First, we identified a group of five species for which morphological identification matched molecular results (<em>Bucephalus minimus</em>, <em>Monorchis parvus</em>, <em>Renicola parvicaudatus</em>, <em>Psilostomum brevicolle</em>, <em>Himasthla interrupta</em>). Second, we identified a group of six species for which molecular results revealed either misidentifications or cryptic diversity (<em>Gymnophallus choledochus</em>, <em>Diphterostomum brusinae</em>, <em>Curtuteria arguinae</em>, <em>Himasthla quissetensis</em>, <em>H. elongata</em>, <em>H</em>. <em>continua</em>). Third, our analyses showed that all sequences of two expected species, <em>Gymnophallus minutus</em> and <em>G. fossarum</em>, matched between the two, strongly suggesting that only <em>G. minutus</em> is present in the studied area. Our study clearly demonstrates that molecular tools are necessary to validate the trematode species composition. However, with 17 distinct genetic lineages detected, some of which are not fully identified, future studies are needed to clarify the identity and status (regular <em>vs.</em> accidental infection) of some of these cryptic trematode species.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424001159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424001159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当感染同一宿主物种的物种之间存在有限的形态差异时,鉴定宿主组织中的海洋吸虫寄生虫可能会很复杂。这对定期调查具有社会经济和生态重要性的物种中的寄生虫群落构成了挑战。本研究主要通过比较形态学和分子物种鉴定方法,鉴定感染欧洲海产双壳类甲壳虫的地衣吸虫种类。采用体视显微镜对10个地点的吸虫进行形态学鉴定,并利用核糖体小亚基(18S) RNA基因(SSU rDNA)和线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基1 (cox1)两种基因标记对吸虫进行系统发育分析。我们首次比较了13种原始物种的形态鉴定和系统发育分析。首先,我们鉴定了形态鉴定与分子鉴定结果相匹配的5个物种(Bucephalus minimus, Monorchis parvus, Renicola parvicaudatus, Psilostomum brevicolle, Himasthla interrupta)。其次,我们鉴定了6个物种(Gymnophallus choledochus, Diphterostomum brusinae, cultuteria arguinae, Himasthla quistensis, H. elongata, H. continua),这些物种的分子鉴定结果要么是错误的,要么是隐蔽的。第三,我们的分析表明,两个预期物种(Gymnophallus minutus和G. fossarum)的所有序列都在两者之间匹配,强烈表明研究区域只有G. minutus存在。我们的研究清楚地表明,分子工具是验证吸虫物种组成的必要条件。然而,由于检测到17种不同的遗传谱系,其中一些尚未完全鉴定,因此需要进一步的研究来澄清这些隐吸虫物种的身份和状态(常规感染与意外感染)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Morphological vs. molecular identification of trematode species infecting the edible cockle Cerastoderma edule across Europe
Identifying marine trematode parasites in host tissue can be complicated when there is limited morphological differentiation between species infecting the same host species. This poses a challenge for regular surveys of the parasite communities in species of socio-economic and ecological importance. Our study focused on identifying digenean trematode species infecting the marine bivalve Cerastoderma edule across Europe by comparing morphological and molecular species identification methods. Cockles were sampled from ten locations to observe the trematode parasites under a stereomicroscope (morphological identification) and to isolate individuals for phylogenetic analyses using two gene markers, the small sub-unit ribosomal (18S) RNA gene (SSU rDNA) and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1). For the first time, we compared both morphological identification and phylogenetic analyses for each of the 13 originally identified species. First, we identified a group of five species for which morphological identification matched molecular results (Bucephalus minimus, Monorchis parvus, Renicola parvicaudatus, Psilostomum brevicolle, Himasthla interrupta). Second, we identified a group of six species for which molecular results revealed either misidentifications or cryptic diversity (Gymnophallus choledochus, Diphterostomum brusinae, Curtuteria arguinae, Himasthla quissetensis, H. elongata, H. continua). Third, our analyses showed that all sequences of two expected species, Gymnophallus minutus and G. fossarum, matched between the two, strongly suggesting that only G. minutus is present in the studied area. Our study clearly demonstrates that molecular tools are necessary to validate the trematode species composition. However, with 17 distinct genetic lineages detected, some of which are not fully identified, future studies are needed to clarify the identity and status (regular vs. accidental infection) of some of these cryptic trematode species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (IJP-PAW) publishes the results of original research on parasites of all wildlife, invertebrate and vertebrate. This includes free-ranging, wild populations, as well as captive wildlife, semi-domesticated species (e.g. reindeer) and farmed populations of recently domesticated or wild-captured species (e.g. cultured fishes). Articles on all aspects of wildlife parasitology are welcomed including taxonomy, biodiversity and distribution, ecology and epidemiology, population biology and host-parasite relationships. The impact of parasites on the health and conservation of wildlife is seen as an important area covered by the journal especially the potential role of environmental factors, for example climate. Also important to the journal is ''one health'' and the nature of interactions between wildlife, people and domestic animals, including disease emergence and zoonoses.
期刊最新文献
A combined treatment regimen for Trichuris rhinopiptheroxella infection in Rhinopithecus roxellana in southern China. Natural life cycle and molecular characterization of Taenia talicei Dollfus, 1960 (Cestoda: Taeniidae) from northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Genetic structure of Trichinella britovi populations in wildlife of north and northeast Iran. Nematophagous fungi as biological control agents of parasitic nematodes in soils of wildlife parks. Gyrodactylus nigeri n. sp. (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae) parasitic on Yunnanilus niger (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1