记忆语义化是个体记忆、集体记忆和社会记忆相互作用的结果

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cortex Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.001
Jean-François Orianne , Denis Peschanski , Jorg Müller , Bérengère Guillery , Francis Eustache
{"title":"记忆语义化是个体记忆、集体记忆和社会记忆相互作用的结果","authors":"Jean-François Orianne ,&nbsp;Denis Peschanski ,&nbsp;Jorg Müller ,&nbsp;Bérengère Guillery ,&nbsp;Francis Eustache","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study of the links between episodic memory (memory of personal experiences) and semantic memory (memory of general knowledge about the world, others, and oneself) has played a significant role in psychology and neuroscience research for several decades. The way memories lose specificity and become semantized over time, and how these two major memory systems interact to represent the individual in the social world and allow to project themselves into the future, are particularly fascinating themes in understanding the mechanisms of autobiographical memory. Numerous studies rely on various memory pathologies, primarily amnesic syndromes but also other disorders where memory impairment is not the main symptom, such as autism spectrum disorders. The thesis we support in this opinion paper is that the process of semantization is not limited to the individual system of consciousness alone, at the root of individual memories, but presupposes cooperation between three types of systems: the central nervous system, the individual system of consciousness and the social system (society). The conceptual tools favored by historians and sociologists complement those of psychologists and neuroscientists, allowing for an original elaboration of this construction of human memory, at the interfaces of individual, collective, and social memories. Based on pioneering works in the social sciences and cognitive neuroscience, we illustrated our position with longitudinal studies conducted in the framework of the “<em>Programme 13-Novembre</em>”, established following the attacks of November 13, 2015, in Paris and its surrounding suburbs. Using this example, and after recalling the theoretical origins of the process of memory semantization in neuropsychology, this article proposes a framework for analyzing the cognitive and social processes that lead to the semantization of memories in individuals, within groups of various sizes, and in society as a whole.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"183 ","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The process of memory semantization as the result of interactions between individual, collective, and social memories\",\"authors\":\"Jean-François Orianne ,&nbsp;Denis Peschanski ,&nbsp;Jorg Müller ,&nbsp;Bérengère Guillery ,&nbsp;Francis Eustache\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study of the links between episodic memory (memory of personal experiences) and semantic memory (memory of general knowledge about the world, others, and oneself) has played a significant role in psychology and neuroscience research for several decades. The way memories lose specificity and become semantized over time, and how these two major memory systems interact to represent the individual in the social world and allow to project themselves into the future, are particularly fascinating themes in understanding the mechanisms of autobiographical memory. Numerous studies rely on various memory pathologies, primarily amnesic syndromes but also other disorders where memory impairment is not the main symptom, such as autism spectrum disorders. The thesis we support in this opinion paper is that the process of semantization is not limited to the individual system of consciousness alone, at the root of individual memories, but presupposes cooperation between three types of systems: the central nervous system, the individual system of consciousness and the social system (society). The conceptual tools favored by historians and sociologists complement those of psychologists and neuroscientists, allowing for an original elaboration of this construction of human memory, at the interfaces of individual, collective, and social memories. Based on pioneering works in the social sciences and cognitive neuroscience, we illustrated our position with longitudinal studies conducted in the framework of the “<em>Programme 13-Novembre</em>”, established following the attacks of November 13, 2015, in Paris and its surrounding suburbs. Using this example, and after recalling the theoretical origins of the process of memory semantization in neuropsychology, this article proposes a framework for analyzing the cognitive and social processes that lead to the semantization of memories in individuals, within groups of various sizes, and in society as a whole.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cortex\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002958\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,对情景记忆(个人经历的记忆)和语义记忆(关于世界、他人和自己的一般知识的记忆)之间联系的研究在心理学和神经科学研究中发挥了重要作用。随着时间的推移,记忆失去特殊性和语义化的方式,以及这两个主要的记忆系统如何相互作用,以代表社会世界中的个人,并允许自己投射到未来,是理解自传式记忆机制的特别有趣的主题。许多研究依赖于各种记忆病理,主要是健忘症,但也有其他记忆障碍不是主要症状的疾病,如自闭症谱系障碍。我们在这篇意见论文中支持的论点是,语义化的过程并不仅仅局限于个体记忆的个体意识系统,而是以三种系统之间的合作为前提:中枢神经系统、个体意识系统和社会系统(社会)。历史学家和社会学家青睐的概念工具补充了心理学家和神经科学家的工具,允许在个人、集体和社会记忆的界面上对人类记忆的这种结构进行原始的阐述。基于社会科学和认知神经科学的开创性工作,我们通过在“11月13日计划”框架内进行的纵向研究说明了我们的立场,该计划是在2015年11月13日巴黎及其周边郊区发生袭击事件后建立的。以此为例,在回顾了神经心理学中记忆语义化过程的理论起源之后,本文提出了一个框架,用于分析导致个体、不同规模的群体和整个社会中记忆语义化的认知和社会过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The process of memory semantization as the result of interactions between individual, collective, and social memories
The study of the links between episodic memory (memory of personal experiences) and semantic memory (memory of general knowledge about the world, others, and oneself) has played a significant role in psychology and neuroscience research for several decades. The way memories lose specificity and become semantized over time, and how these two major memory systems interact to represent the individual in the social world and allow to project themselves into the future, are particularly fascinating themes in understanding the mechanisms of autobiographical memory. Numerous studies rely on various memory pathologies, primarily amnesic syndromes but also other disorders where memory impairment is not the main symptom, such as autism spectrum disorders. The thesis we support in this opinion paper is that the process of semantization is not limited to the individual system of consciousness alone, at the root of individual memories, but presupposes cooperation between three types of systems: the central nervous system, the individual system of consciousness and the social system (society). The conceptual tools favored by historians and sociologists complement those of psychologists and neuroscientists, allowing for an original elaboration of this construction of human memory, at the interfaces of individual, collective, and social memories. Based on pioneering works in the social sciences and cognitive neuroscience, we illustrated our position with longitudinal studies conducted in the framework of the “Programme 13-Novembre”, established following the attacks of November 13, 2015, in Paris and its surrounding suburbs. Using this example, and after recalling the theoretical origins of the process of memory semantization in neuropsychology, this article proposes a framework for analyzing the cognitive and social processes that lead to the semantization of memories in individuals, within groups of various sizes, and in society as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Overlapping but separate number representations in the intraparietal sulcus-Probing format- and modality-independence in sighted Braille readers" [Cortex 162 (May 2023) 65-80]. Exploring specific alterations at the explicit and perceptual levels in sense of ownership, agency, and body schema in Functional Motor Disorder: A pilot comparative study with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Trajectories of intrinsic connectivity one year post pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: Neural injury superimposed on neurodevelopment. Revisiting the electrophysiological correlates of valence and expectancy in reward processing - A multi-lab replication. Hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory cortex reflect discriminative responses to temporal details or summary statistics of stationary sounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1