泰国饮料包装的生命周期评估:从建模选择和替代改进政策的含义

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108022
Parncheewa Kositcharoenkul , Apathorn Prempreeda , Phyo Zaw Oo , Aakriti Deuja , Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee , Shabbir H. Gheewala , Trakarn Prapaspongsa
{"title":"泰国饮料包装的生命周期评估:从建模选择和替代改进政策的含义","authors":"Parncheewa Kositcharoenkul ,&nbsp;Apathorn Prempreeda ,&nbsp;Phyo Zaw Oo ,&nbsp;Aakriti Deuja ,&nbsp;Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee ,&nbsp;Shabbir H. Gheewala ,&nbsp;Trakarn Prapaspongsa","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Life Cycle Assessment of four important beverage packaging types in Thailand —aluminum cans, aseptic cartons, polyethylene terephthalate and glass bottles— applying a spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment method is carried out to assess the environmental burdens and implications from modeling choices and alternative improvement policies. Packaging wastes are not recycled as high as the demand in Thailand; so the end-of-life recycling model is recommended for promoting recycling and mitigating packaging waste management issues. With the subsequent improvement in the recycling rates, increasing the usage of recycled materials becomes a crucial issue for the raw material acquisition and manufacturing phase, for which the recycled content model is recommended. Our findings recommend prioritizing policies for increasing both end-of-life recycling and recycled content to enhance the environmental sustainability of beverage packaging. Promotion of electrification in manufacturing is not recommended until the electricity is produced from renewable sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108022"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of beverage packaging in Thailand: Implications from modeling choices and alternative improvement policies\",\"authors\":\"Parncheewa Kositcharoenkul ,&nbsp;Apathorn Prempreeda ,&nbsp;Phyo Zaw Oo ,&nbsp;Aakriti Deuja ,&nbsp;Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee ,&nbsp;Shabbir H. Gheewala ,&nbsp;Trakarn Prapaspongsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Life Cycle Assessment of four important beverage packaging types in Thailand —aluminum cans, aseptic cartons, polyethylene terephthalate and glass bottles— applying a spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment method is carried out to assess the environmental burdens and implications from modeling choices and alternative improvement policies. Packaging wastes are not recycled as high as the demand in Thailand; so the end-of-life recycling model is recommended for promoting recycling and mitigating packaging waste management issues. With the subsequent improvement in the recycling rates, increasing the usage of recycled materials becomes a crucial issue for the raw material acquisition and manufacturing phase, for which the recycled content model is recommended. Our findings recommend prioritizing policies for increasing both end-of-life recycling and recycled content to enhance the environmental sustainability of beverage packaging. Promotion of electrification in manufacturing is not recommended until the electricity is produced from renewable sources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400613X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400613X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对泰国四种重要的饮料包装类型——铝罐、无菌纸盒、聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯和玻璃瓶——进行生命周期评估,应用空间差异化的生命周期影响评估方法,评估模型选择和替代改进政策的环境负担和影响。在泰国,包装废弃物的回收利用率没有需求那么高;因此,建议使用报废回收模式来促进回收和减轻包装废物管理问题。随着回收率的提高,增加回收材料的使用成为原材料获取和制造阶段的关键问题,为此推荐了回收含量模型。我们的研究结果建议优先制定政策,增加报废回收和回收内容,以提高饮料包装的环境可持续性。在电力来自可再生能源之前,不建议促进制造业的电气化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life cycle assessment of beverage packaging in Thailand: Implications from modeling choices and alternative improvement policies
Life Cycle Assessment of four important beverage packaging types in Thailand —aluminum cans, aseptic cartons, polyethylene terephthalate and glass bottles— applying a spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment method is carried out to assess the environmental burdens and implications from modeling choices and alternative improvement policies. Packaging wastes are not recycled as high as the demand in Thailand; so the end-of-life recycling model is recommended for promoting recycling and mitigating packaging waste management issues. With the subsequent improvement in the recycling rates, increasing the usage of recycled materials becomes a crucial issue for the raw material acquisition and manufacturing phase, for which the recycled content model is recommended. Our findings recommend prioritizing policies for increasing both end-of-life recycling and recycled content to enhance the environmental sustainability of beverage packaging. Promotion of electrification in manufacturing is not recommended until the electricity is produced from renewable sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Electrical and electronic equipment repair in a circular economy: Investigating consumer behaviour in Hong Kong Phenol production from pyrolysis of waste printed circuit boards: life cycle and techno-economic assessment How does digitalization affect carbon emissions in animal husbandry? A new evidence from China Dynamic assessment of photovoltaic waste streams in the EU-27 countries under the circular economy principles of ‘Reduce, Reuse and Recycle’ Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1