Patrick R. Cunningham , Li Wang , Somayeh Nassiri , Peter Thy , John T. Harvey , Bryan M. Jenkins , Sabbie A. Miller
{"title":"稻秆和稻壳灰作为补充胶凝材料的抗压强度和区域供应意义","authors":"Patrick R. Cunningham , Li Wang , Somayeh Nassiri , Peter Thy , John T. Harvey , Bryan M. Jenkins , Sabbie A. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108024"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials\",\"authors\":\"Patrick R. Cunningham , Li Wang , Somayeh Nassiri , Peter Thy , John T. Harvey , Bryan M. Jenkins , Sabbie A. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924006153\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924006153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials
Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.