Sanchayan Nath , Arya A Pillai , Aswin Ram , A.N Gayathri , N Viswanath , Purusotham Tanjeri , R Anuradha , R Arulprasad
{"title":"进行定量分析,以确定印度卫生保健部门管理废物管理的政策文件中纳入的循环经济概念","authors":"Sanchayan Nath , Arya A Pillai , Aswin Ram , A.N Gayathri , N Viswanath , Purusotham Tanjeri , R Anuradha , R Arulprasad","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is limited clarity on whether policy regimes for managing waste in the healthcare sector are designed for circularity. Systematic evaluation of policy instruments is largely unavailable. How circular is India's policy regime on managing healthcare waste? Using an innovative analytical approach based on the 6Rs of circularity and the principles of BS8001:2017, this research question is answered by quantitatively analysing 41 policy instruments associated with the policy regime on managing healthcare waste in India. Content analysis reveals that the policy regime for managing healthcare waste in India is linear – the regime needs to be dramatically rehauled to ensure circularity. Only about 3 to 5 % of circular economy-related codes could be identified in the policy instruments studied by this article. Transitioning to more integrated, holistic, and systems-oriented circular economic practices will, therefore, require a paradigm shift in thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108037"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative analysis to identify circular economy concepts incorporated in Indian policy documents regulating waste management by the Indian Healthcare sector\",\"authors\":\"Sanchayan Nath , Arya A Pillai , Aswin Ram , A.N Gayathri , N Viswanath , Purusotham Tanjeri , R Anuradha , R Arulprasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is limited clarity on whether policy regimes for managing waste in the healthcare sector are designed for circularity. Systematic evaluation of policy instruments is largely unavailable. How circular is India's policy regime on managing healthcare waste? Using an innovative analytical approach based on the 6Rs of circularity and the principles of BS8001:2017, this research question is answered by quantitatively analysing 41 policy instruments associated with the policy regime on managing healthcare waste in India. Content analysis reveals that the policy regime for managing healthcare waste in India is linear – the regime needs to be dramatically rehauled to ensure circularity. Only about 3 to 5 % of circular economy-related codes could be identified in the policy instruments studied by this article. Transitioning to more integrated, holistic, and systems-oriented circular economic practices will, therefore, require a paradigm shift in thinking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400627X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400627X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative analysis to identify circular economy concepts incorporated in Indian policy documents regulating waste management by the Indian Healthcare sector
There is limited clarity on whether policy regimes for managing waste in the healthcare sector are designed for circularity. Systematic evaluation of policy instruments is largely unavailable. How circular is India's policy regime on managing healthcare waste? Using an innovative analytical approach based on the 6Rs of circularity and the principles of BS8001:2017, this research question is answered by quantitatively analysing 41 policy instruments associated with the policy regime on managing healthcare waste in India. Content analysis reveals that the policy regime for managing healthcare waste in India is linear – the regime needs to be dramatically rehauled to ensure circularity. Only about 3 to 5 % of circular economy-related codes could be identified in the policy instruments studied by this article. Transitioning to more integrated, holistic, and systems-oriented circular economic practices will, therefore, require a paradigm shift in thinking.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.