一种量化几何设计特征和交通控制装置对部分立交桥终端错误驾驶事件影响的机器学习方法

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107855
Qing Chang , Huaguo Zhou , Yukun Song , Jingyi Zheng , Fangjian Yang
{"title":"一种量化几何设计特征和交通控制装置对部分立交桥终端错误驾驶事件影响的机器学习方法","authors":"Qing Chang ,&nbsp;Huaguo Zhou ,&nbsp;Yukun Song ,&nbsp;Jingyi Zheng ,&nbsp;Fangjian Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the issue of wrong-way driving (WWD) incidents at partial cloverleaf (parclo) interchange terminals in the United States. These incidents are a safety concern, often attributed to geometric design features and inadequate traffic control devices (TCDs). While previous research has acknowledged the significance of parclo interchanges as common initial entry points for WWD crashes, few studies have comprehensively quantified the impact of TCDs and design features on recurring WWD incidents.</div><div>In response, this study collected data from 75 parclo interchange terminals spanning 13 states. A subset of 28 ramp terminals exhibiting recurrent WWD incidents, amounting to 410 incidents during the data collection phase, received focused attention. Leveraging modern machine learning methodologies, two techniques: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Lasso-logistic regression were applied to quantify the influence of distinct TCDs and design features on the probability of WWD incidents occurring.</div><div>The outcomes of this analysis revealed noteworthy results: the fitted XGboost model displayed an average accuracy of 80%, closely followed by the fitted Lasso-logistic regression model with an average accuracy of 78%. These models were subsequently employed to construct a practical network screening tool. This tool assists in the identification of potential WWD incident locations, predicated on the effects of TCDs and design characteristics.</div><div>The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform and guide state and local transportation agencies in enhancing the safety of parclo interchange terminals. By discerning the impacts of TCDs and design features, stakeholders can implement improvements that curtail the occurrence of WWD incidents, contributing to enhanced road safety and optimized traffic management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107855"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning approach to quantify effects of geometric design features and traffic control devices on wrong-way driving incidents at partial cloverleaf interchange terminals\",\"authors\":\"Qing Chang ,&nbsp;Huaguo Zhou ,&nbsp;Yukun Song ,&nbsp;Jingyi Zheng ,&nbsp;Fangjian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study addresses the issue of wrong-way driving (WWD) incidents at partial cloverleaf (parclo) interchange terminals in the United States. These incidents are a safety concern, often attributed to geometric design features and inadequate traffic control devices (TCDs). While previous research has acknowledged the significance of parclo interchanges as common initial entry points for WWD crashes, few studies have comprehensively quantified the impact of TCDs and design features on recurring WWD incidents.</div><div>In response, this study collected data from 75 parclo interchange terminals spanning 13 states. A subset of 28 ramp terminals exhibiting recurrent WWD incidents, amounting to 410 incidents during the data collection phase, received focused attention. Leveraging modern machine learning methodologies, two techniques: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Lasso-logistic regression were applied to quantify the influence of distinct TCDs and design features on the probability of WWD incidents occurring.</div><div>The outcomes of this analysis revealed noteworthy results: the fitted XGboost model displayed an average accuracy of 80%, closely followed by the fitted Lasso-logistic regression model with an average accuracy of 78%. These models were subsequently employed to construct a practical network screening tool. This tool assists in the identification of potential WWD incident locations, predicated on the effects of TCDs and design characteristics.</div><div>The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform and guide state and local transportation agencies in enhancing the safety of parclo interchange terminals. By discerning the impacts of TCDs and design features, stakeholders can implement improvements that curtail the occurrence of WWD incidents, contributing to enhanced road safety and optimized traffic management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524004007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524004007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究针对美国部分三立叶(parclo)立交终点站的错误驾驶(WWD)事件。这些事故是一个安全问题,通常归因于几何设计特征和不充分的交通控制设备(tcd)。虽然以前的研究已经承认了parclo交汇处作为污水排放事故常见的初始入口点的重要性,但很少有研究全面量化了tcd和设计特征对重复发生的污水排放事件的影响。为此,本研究收集了横跨13个州的75个parclo交换终端的数据。在数据收集阶段,28个污水处理码头经常发生污水排放事故,总数达410起。利用现代机器学习方法,应用两种技术:极端梯度增强(XGboost)和套索逻辑回归来量化不同的tcd和设计特征对WWD事件发生概率的影响。分析结果显示了值得注意的结果:拟合的XGboost模型平均准确率为80%,紧随其后的是拟合的Lasso-logistic回归模型,平均准确率为78%。这些模型随后被用来构建一个实用的网络筛选工具。根据tcd的影响和设计特点,该工具有助于识别潜在的WWD事件地点。本研究的意义在于它有可能为州和地方运输机构提供信息和指导,以提高parclo立交终端的安全性。持份者若能辨识污水处理厂的影响及设计特点,便可采取改善措施,减少污水处理厂事故的发生,从而有助加强道路安全和优化交通管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A machine learning approach to quantify effects of geometric design features and traffic control devices on wrong-way driving incidents at partial cloverleaf interchange terminals
This study addresses the issue of wrong-way driving (WWD) incidents at partial cloverleaf (parclo) interchange terminals in the United States. These incidents are a safety concern, often attributed to geometric design features and inadequate traffic control devices (TCDs). While previous research has acknowledged the significance of parclo interchanges as common initial entry points for WWD crashes, few studies have comprehensively quantified the impact of TCDs and design features on recurring WWD incidents.
In response, this study collected data from 75 parclo interchange terminals spanning 13 states. A subset of 28 ramp terminals exhibiting recurrent WWD incidents, amounting to 410 incidents during the data collection phase, received focused attention. Leveraging modern machine learning methodologies, two techniques: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Lasso-logistic regression were applied to quantify the influence of distinct TCDs and design features on the probability of WWD incidents occurring.
The outcomes of this analysis revealed noteworthy results: the fitted XGboost model displayed an average accuracy of 80%, closely followed by the fitted Lasso-logistic regression model with an average accuracy of 78%. These models were subsequently employed to construct a practical network screening tool. This tool assists in the identification of potential WWD incident locations, predicated on the effects of TCDs and design characteristics.
The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform and guide state and local transportation agencies in enhancing the safety of parclo interchange terminals. By discerning the impacts of TCDs and design features, stakeholders can implement improvements that curtail the occurrence of WWD incidents, contributing to enhanced road safety and optimized traffic management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
A game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Young Motorcyclists' Behavior Analysis in Pakistan based on Modified Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (MRBQ). A discrete choice latent class method for capturing unobserved heterogeneity in cyclist crossing behaviour at crosswalks. Assessing e-scooter rider safety perceptions in shared spaces: Evidence from a video experiment in Sweden. Examining macro-level traffic crashes considering nonlinear and spatiotemporal spillover effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1