Vu Dinh Thiem , Dang Duc Anh , Vu Hai Ha , Nguyen Van Thom , Tran Cong Thang , Jose Mateus , Juan Manuel Carreño , Rama Raghunandan , Nguyen Mai Huong , Laina D. Mercer , Jorge Flores , E. Alexandar Escarrega , Ariel Raskin , Duong Huu Thai , Le Van Be , Alessandro Sette , Bruce L. Innis , Florian Krammer , Daniela Weiskopf
{"title":"表达SARS-CoV-2刺突的灭活重组新城疫病毒疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、比较对照的2期试验","authors":"Vu Dinh Thiem , Dang Duc Anh , Vu Hai Ha , Nguyen Van Thom , Tran Cong Thang , Jose Mateus , Juan Manuel Carreño , Rama Raghunandan , Nguyen Mai Huong , Laina D. Mercer , Jorge Flores , E. Alexandar Escarrega , Ariel Raskin , Duong Huu Thai , Le Van Be , Alessandro Sette , Bruce L. Innis , Florian Krammer , Daniela Weiskopf","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Abstract</div><div>Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine.</div><div>This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18–59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose.</div><div>The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT05940194</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div><div>During August 10–23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124–125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18–59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2–189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45–220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80–123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4–252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6–367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68–113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA.</div><div>On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18–59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg <em>N</em> = 82, 95 % CI 25·14–38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; <em>N</em> = 83, 95 % CI 29·03–44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10–23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; <em>N</em> = 42, 95 % CI 27·43–50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; <em>N</em> = 40, 95 % CI 35·46–70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73–22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30–2·40) for subjects age 18–59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98–5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51–2·43) and 2·32 (0·69–7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT05940194</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 126542"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, comparator-controlled, phase 2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Vu Dinh Thiem , Dang Duc Anh , Vu Hai Ha , Nguyen Van Thom , Tran Cong Thang , Jose Mateus , Juan Manuel Carreño , Rama Raghunandan , Nguyen Mai Huong , Laina D. Mercer , Jorge Flores , E. Alexandar Escarrega , Ariel Raskin , Duong Huu Thai , Le Van Be , Alessandro Sette , Bruce L. Innis , Florian Krammer , Daniela Weiskopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Abstract</div><div>Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine.</div><div>This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18–59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose.</div><div>The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT05940194</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div><div>During August 10–23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124–125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18–59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2–189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45–220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80–123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4–252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6–367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68–113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA.</div><div>On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18–59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg <em>N</em> = 82, 95 % CI 25·14–38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; <em>N</em> = 83, 95 % CI 29·03–44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10–23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; <em>N</em> = 42, 95 % CI 27·43–50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; <em>N</em> = 40, 95 % CI 35·46–70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73–22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30–2·40) for subjects age 18–59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98–5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51–2·43) and 2·32 (0·69–7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT05940194</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24012246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24012246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
需要在低收入和中低收入国家生产负担得起的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗。NDV-HXP-S是一种表达严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)刺突蛋白的重组新城疫病毒灭活疫苗。越南一家公共部门生产商评估了NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC)相对于一种获批疫苗的免疫原性。这是一项随机、观察者盲、对照、1/2期试验的2期,在越南泰平省的三个社区卫生中心进行。18岁及以上的健康男性和未怀孕女性均符合条件。参与者按年龄(18-59岁,≥60岁)随机分组,接受肌肉注射治疗2次,间隔28天:COVIVAC剂量为3 μg或6 μg,或阿斯利康COVID-19疫苗VAXZEVRIA™。参与者和评估结果的人员对治疗不知情。疫苗剂量是根据第一阶段的结果选择的。选择6 μg剂量,考察免疫原性较3 μg剂量的增益。该研究的目的是与越南最常用的COVID-19疫苗VAXZEVRIA相比,在两个剂量水平上评估COVIVAC的安全性和免疫原性。主要结果是在按年龄组第二次接种后14天(第43天)和6个月(第197天)诱导针对疫苗同源伪型病毒的50%中和抗体滴度。初级免疫原性和安全性分析包括所有接受一剂疫苗的参与者。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05940194。在2021年8月10日至23日期间,对737人进行了筛查,并将374人随机分组(每组124-125人);所有受试者都接种了第一剂疫苗,除三人外,所有受试者都在四周后接种了第二剂疫苗。18-59岁受试者在第二次接种后14天的PNA几何平均滴度如下:COVIVAC 3 μg为153⋅28 (95% CI 124·2 - 189⋅15),COVIVAC 6 μg为176⋅2 (95% CI 141⋅45-220.27),VAXZEVRIA为99⋅92(95% CI 80.80-123⋅56)。年龄≥60岁的受试者在同一时间点也获得了有效的PNA几何平均滴度:COVIVAC 3 μg为183⋅57 (95% CI 133.4-252⋅61),COVIVAC 6 μg为257⋅87 (95% CI 181⋅6 - 367⋅18),VAXZEVRIA为79⋅49(95% CI 55⋅68-113⋅4)。在第43天,18-59岁受试者50%中和抗体滴度的几何平均倍数上升为31.20 (COVIVAC 3 μg N = 82, 95% CI 25.14 - 38.74), 35.80 (COVIVAC 6 μg;N = 83, 95% ci为29.03 - 44.15),18.85 (vaxzevria;N = 82, 95% CI为15.10 ~ 23.54),年龄≥60岁的受试者为37.27 (COVIVAC 3 μg;N = 42岁,95% CI 27·43-50·63),50·10 (COVIVAC 6μg;N = 40, 95% ci 35·46-70·76),16·11 (vaxzevria;N = 40, 95% ci 11.73 - 22.13)。在基线抗s IgG血清阴性受试者中,18-59岁受试者第43天中和抗体(COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA)几何平均滴度比为1.77 (95% CI 1.30 ~ 2.40),≥60岁受试者第43天中和抗体(COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA)几何平均滴度比为3.24 (95% CI 1.98 ~ 5.32)。第197天,年龄比分别为1.11 (95% CI 0.51 ~ 0.43)和2.32(0.69 ~ 7.85)。疫苗耐受性良好;反应原性主要是轻微和短暂的。接种疫苗后28天发生非主动不良事件(ae)的受试者比例在不同治疗组中相似(COVIVAC 3 μg 29.0%、COVIVAC 6 μg 23.2%、VAXZEVRIA 31.2%);未见与疫苗相关的AE报告。考虑到针对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体的诱导与包括VAXZEVRIA在内的COVID-19疫苗的疗效相关,我们的研究结果表明,接种COVIVAC可能提供与VAXZEVRIA疫苗相当或超过的临床效益
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, comparator-controlled, phase 2 trial
Abstract
Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine.
This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18–59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose.
The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194.
During August 10–23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124–125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18–59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2–189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45–220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80–123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4–252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6–367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68–113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA.
On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18–59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg N = 82, 95 % CI 25·14–38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 83, 95 % CI 29·03–44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10–23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; N = 42, 95 % CI 27·43–50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 40, 95 % CI 35·46–70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73–22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30–2·40) for subjects age 18–59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98–5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51–2·43) and 2·32 (0·69–7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.