水市场与水反弹:中国水权交易政策

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108471
Jichuan Sheng , Ruzhu Zhang , Hongqiang Yang , Cheng Chen
{"title":"水市场与水反弹:中国水权交易政策","authors":"Jichuan Sheng ,&nbsp;Ruzhu Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongqiang Yang ,&nbsp;Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water markets aim to achieve water conservation and efficient allocation through market transactions. However, the presence of water rebounds may counteract this effect. Water markets and water rebounds have a complex interaction that has not been adequately explored in current studies. This study fills this research gap by developing an analytical framework connecting water markets and water rebounds and scrutinizing the causal linkage between them and the potential mechanisms involved within the context of China's water rights trading (WRT) policy. The findings have the potential to significantly impact water management strategies. We argue that water markets and water rebound mitigation—which is frequently linked with the capacity of water markets to improve water quality—are causally related. Furthermore, deploying water markets may also slow technological progress, resulting in reduced water efficiency and hence, an indirect mitigation of water rebounds. Lastly, the impact of water markets on water rebounds varies according to water availability and socioeconomic levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 108471"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water markets and water rebounds: China's water rights trading policy\",\"authors\":\"Jichuan Sheng ,&nbsp;Ruzhu Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongqiang Yang ,&nbsp;Cheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water markets aim to achieve water conservation and efficient allocation through market transactions. However, the presence of water rebounds may counteract this effect. Water markets and water rebounds have a complex interaction that has not been adequately explored in current studies. This study fills this research gap by developing an analytical framework connecting water markets and water rebounds and scrutinizing the causal linkage between them and the potential mechanisms involved within the context of China's water rights trading (WRT) policy. The findings have the potential to significantly impact water management strategies. We argue that water markets and water rebound mitigation—which is frequently linked with the capacity of water markets to improve water quality—are causally related. Furthermore, deploying water markets may also slow technological progress, resulting in reduced water efficiency and hence, an indirect mitigation of water rebounds. Lastly, the impact of water markets on water rebounds varies according to water availability and socioeconomic levels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水市场的目的是通过市场交易实现水资源的节约和有效配置。然而,水反弹的存在可能会抵消这种影响。水市场和水反弹具有复杂的相互作用,目前的研究尚未充分探讨。本研究通过建立一个连接水市场和水反弹的分析框架,并在中国水权交易(WRT)政策的背景下审视它们之间的因果关系和潜在机制,填补了这一研究空白。这些发现有可能对水资源管理战略产生重大影响。我们认为,水市场和缓解水反弹(通常与水市场改善水质的能力有关)之间存在因果关系。此外,部署水市场还可能减缓技术进步,导致用水效率降低,从而间接减缓用水反弹。最后,水资源市场对水资源反弹的影响因水资源供应和社会经济水平而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Water markets and water rebounds: China's water rights trading policy
Water markets aim to achieve water conservation and efficient allocation through market transactions. However, the presence of water rebounds may counteract this effect. Water markets and water rebounds have a complex interaction that has not been adequately explored in current studies. This study fills this research gap by developing an analytical framework connecting water markets and water rebounds and scrutinizing the causal linkage between them and the potential mechanisms involved within the context of China's water rights trading (WRT) policy. The findings have the potential to significantly impact water management strategies. We argue that water markets and water rebound mitigation—which is frequently linked with the capacity of water markets to improve water quality—are causally related. Furthermore, deploying water markets may also slow technological progress, resulting in reduced water efficiency and hence, an indirect mitigation of water rebounds. Lastly, the impact of water markets on water rebounds varies according to water availability and socioeconomic levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Divergent outcomes of large-scale land transactions in Ethiopia: A quantitative comparative analysis Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function Why degrowth should be disentangled from the wellbeing economy Motivational levers for the preservation of an intergenerational common resource: An experiment The environment–economic growth trade-off: does support for environmental protection depend on its economic consequences?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1