提高对气候变化的认识能带来更环保的选择吗?来自沉浸式虚拟环境实验的证据

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108475
Tommaso Luzzati , Stefano Baraldi , Sara Ermini , Claudia Faita , Valeria Faralla , Pietro Guarnieri , Luca Lusuardi , Vincenzo Santalucia , Sara Scipioni , Matteo Sirizzotti , Alessandro Innocenti
{"title":"提高对气候变化的认识能带来更环保的选择吗?来自沉浸式虚拟环境实验的证据","authors":"Tommaso Luzzati ,&nbsp;Stefano Baraldi ,&nbsp;Sara Ermini ,&nbsp;Claudia Faita ,&nbsp;Valeria Faralla ,&nbsp;Pietro Guarnieri ,&nbsp;Luca Lusuardi ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Santalucia ,&nbsp;Sara Scipioni ,&nbsp;Matteo Sirizzotti ,&nbsp;Alessandro Innocenti","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rational decision theory assumes that individuals have perfect knowledge of the consequences of their choices and actions. However, this assumption often fails to align with reality, particularly in the context of environmental degradation, where the impacts of actions can be distant in both time and space. Will an enhanced perception of those impacts encourage pro-environmental choices?</div><div>To explore this question, we designed and conducted an experiment in an immersive virtual reality environment (IVE). After an initial training phase, participants were asked to choose between using a tumble dryer or a clothesline to dry their laundry. Participants in the treatment group received exaggerated feedback during the training phase, experiencing a simulated sudden outbreak of a thunderstorm when they used the dryer. In contrast, participants in the control group did not receive any feedback. The experiment was conducted at two Italian universities, Siena and Pisa, with a total of 270 subjects.</div><div>The methodological finding is that even less elaborated IVEs can still be effective as experimental tools. The substantive finding is that exposure to exaggerated feedback in an IVE significantly increased the likelihood of choosing a more environmentally friendly action, such as using a clothesline, which involves lower energy consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 108475"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can improving climate change perception lead to more environmentally friendly choices? Evidence from an immersive virtual environment experiment\",\"authors\":\"Tommaso Luzzati ,&nbsp;Stefano Baraldi ,&nbsp;Sara Ermini ,&nbsp;Claudia Faita ,&nbsp;Valeria Faralla ,&nbsp;Pietro Guarnieri ,&nbsp;Luca Lusuardi ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Santalucia ,&nbsp;Sara Scipioni ,&nbsp;Matteo Sirizzotti ,&nbsp;Alessandro Innocenti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rational decision theory assumes that individuals have perfect knowledge of the consequences of their choices and actions. However, this assumption often fails to align with reality, particularly in the context of environmental degradation, where the impacts of actions can be distant in both time and space. Will an enhanced perception of those impacts encourage pro-environmental choices?</div><div>To explore this question, we designed and conducted an experiment in an immersive virtual reality environment (IVE). After an initial training phase, participants were asked to choose between using a tumble dryer or a clothesline to dry their laundry. Participants in the treatment group received exaggerated feedback during the training phase, experiencing a simulated sudden outbreak of a thunderstorm when they used the dryer. In contrast, participants in the control group did not receive any feedback. The experiment was conducted at two Italian universities, Siena and Pisa, with a total of 270 subjects.</div><div>The methodological finding is that even less elaborated IVEs can still be effective as experimental tools. The substantive finding is that exposure to exaggerated feedback in an IVE significantly increased the likelihood of choosing a more environmentally friendly action, such as using a clothesline, which involves lower energy consumption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003720\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理性决策理论假设个人对其选择和行为的后果有完全的了解。然而,这种假设往往与现实不符,特别是在环境退化的情况下,在这种情况下,行动的影响在时间和空间上都可能是遥远的。增强对这些影响的认识是否会鼓励亲环境的选择?为了探索这个问题,我们在沉浸式虚拟现实环境(IVE)中设计并进行了一个实验。在最初的训练阶段之后,参与者被要求在使用滚筒式烘干机和晾衣绳之间做出选择。试验组的参与者在训练阶段收到了夸张的反馈,当他们使用烘干机时,他们经历了模拟的雷暴突然爆发。相比之下,对照组的参与者没有收到任何反馈。这项实验在意大利的锡耶纳和比萨两所大学进行,共有270名受试者。方法学上的发现是,即使不太复杂的人工智能也可以作为有效的实验工具。实质性的发现是,在IVE中暴露于夸大的反馈显著增加了选择更环保行为的可能性,例如使用低能耗的晾衣绳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can improving climate change perception lead to more environmentally friendly choices? Evidence from an immersive virtual environment experiment
Rational decision theory assumes that individuals have perfect knowledge of the consequences of their choices and actions. However, this assumption often fails to align with reality, particularly in the context of environmental degradation, where the impacts of actions can be distant in both time and space. Will an enhanced perception of those impacts encourage pro-environmental choices?
To explore this question, we designed and conducted an experiment in an immersive virtual reality environment (IVE). After an initial training phase, participants were asked to choose between using a tumble dryer or a clothesline to dry their laundry. Participants in the treatment group received exaggerated feedback during the training phase, experiencing a simulated sudden outbreak of a thunderstorm when they used the dryer. In contrast, participants in the control group did not receive any feedback. The experiment was conducted at two Italian universities, Siena and Pisa, with a total of 270 subjects.
The methodological finding is that even less elaborated IVEs can still be effective as experimental tools. The substantive finding is that exposure to exaggerated feedback in an IVE significantly increased the likelihood of choosing a more environmentally friendly action, such as using a clothesline, which involves lower energy consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
The benefits of less: The effect of sufficiency gain framing on sufficiency behavior Compact and livable? Identifying and managing the relationships between intensive land use and urban livability: Evidence from 337 cities in China Environmental resource extraction and poverty: Comparative evidence from rural Thailand and Vietnam Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status Analysing the expansion of the circular economy in the European Union: How important is the regional context?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1