Lisa E.M. Davies , Hendrika A. van den Ham , Arnt F.A. Schellekens , Daphne Philbert , Marcel L. Bouvy
{"title":"初级保健中阿片类药物处方教育的患者满意度","authors":"Lisa E.M. Davies , Hendrika A. van den Ham , Arnt F.A. Schellekens , Daphne Philbert , Marcel L. Bouvy","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study explores patients' satisfaction with opioid education, identifies areas for improvement, and assesses differences between those more or less satisfied with their opioid education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey of adults with prescription opioid experience. Respondents reported opioid details, demographics, and pain coping. Satisfaction with education from prescribers and pharmacy staff on opioid usage, pain relief expectations, side effects, and tapering was assessed. Open-ended questions gathered suggestions for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents (n = 1605) seemed more satisfied with information on opioid usage (59–80 %) and expected pain relief (46–72 %) than on side effects (50–65 %) and tapering (29–50 %). Prescriber-provided education received higher satisfaction scores than pharmacy staff-provided education, though both were valued equally (∼ 70 %). Dissatisfied respondents tended to have higher education levels, lower pain coping scores, and often ineffective opioid experiences. Qualitative analysis of the 404 respondents who indicated a need for improvement emphasised the need for clearer information on side effects, addiction risks, and tapering, and more understandable formats.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Opioid patient education should prioritise addressing side effects, addiction risks, and tapering at treatment initiation. The educational contributions of both prescribers and pharmacy staff are deemed important.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Engaging pharmacy staff, especially during repeat dispensing, can enhance patient education on opioids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 108572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient satisfaction with prescription opioid education in primary care\",\"authors\":\"Lisa E.M. Davies , Hendrika A. van den Ham , Arnt F.A. Schellekens , Daphne Philbert , Marcel L. Bouvy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study explores patients' satisfaction with opioid education, identifies areas for improvement, and assesses differences between those more or less satisfied with their opioid education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey of adults with prescription opioid experience. Respondents reported opioid details, demographics, and pain coping. Satisfaction with education from prescribers and pharmacy staff on opioid usage, pain relief expectations, side effects, and tapering was assessed. Open-ended questions gathered suggestions for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents (n = 1605) seemed more satisfied with information on opioid usage (59–80 %) and expected pain relief (46–72 %) than on side effects (50–65 %) and tapering (29–50 %). Prescriber-provided education received higher satisfaction scores than pharmacy staff-provided education, though both were valued equally (∼ 70 %). Dissatisfied respondents tended to have higher education levels, lower pain coping scores, and often ineffective opioid experiences. Qualitative analysis of the 404 respondents who indicated a need for improvement emphasised the need for clearer information on side effects, addiction risks, and tapering, and more understandable formats.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Opioid patient education should prioritise addressing side effects, addiction risks, and tapering at treatment initiation. The educational contributions of both prescribers and pharmacy staff are deemed important.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Engaging pharmacy staff, especially during repeat dispensing, can enhance patient education on opioids.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124004397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124004397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient satisfaction with prescription opioid education in primary care
Objectives
This study explores patients' satisfaction with opioid education, identifies areas for improvement, and assesses differences between those more or less satisfied with their opioid education.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey of adults with prescription opioid experience. Respondents reported opioid details, demographics, and pain coping. Satisfaction with education from prescribers and pharmacy staff on opioid usage, pain relief expectations, side effects, and tapering was assessed. Open-ended questions gathered suggestions for improvement.
Results
Respondents (n = 1605) seemed more satisfied with information on opioid usage (59–80 %) and expected pain relief (46–72 %) than on side effects (50–65 %) and tapering (29–50 %). Prescriber-provided education received higher satisfaction scores than pharmacy staff-provided education, though both were valued equally (∼ 70 %). Dissatisfied respondents tended to have higher education levels, lower pain coping scores, and often ineffective opioid experiences. Qualitative analysis of the 404 respondents who indicated a need for improvement emphasised the need for clearer information on side effects, addiction risks, and tapering, and more understandable formats.
Conclusions
Opioid patient education should prioritise addressing side effects, addiction risks, and tapering at treatment initiation. The educational contributions of both prescribers and pharmacy staff are deemed important.
Practice implications
Engaging pharmacy staff, especially during repeat dispensing, can enhance patient education on opioids.
期刊介绍：
Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
