P. Jeffrey Brantingham , Randall Haas , Steven L. Kuhn
{"title":"流动性的宏观考古学观点","authors":"P. Jeffrey Brantingham , Randall Haas , Steven L. Kuhn","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaeological evidence of mobility is often analyzed using ethnographic-scale models of individual foraging trips and residential moves as a point of reference. Due to site formation processes and the limitations of geochronology, the archaeological record rarely offers the kind of fine-grained resolution needed to identify mobility events at this scale. Here we explore an alternative, macroarchaeological approach that asks how site occupation patterns in a region balance the evolutionary tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. We use a statistical point process model that equates independent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploration and dependent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploitation. We evaluate the theoretical expectations against the archaeological record of North America using radiocarbon dates from multi-occupation sites. We find strong clustering at short waiting-time intervals of less than under 1000 years, consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploitation at those scales. At longer time scales, waiting times are consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploration. Implications for social learning and niche construction models are explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A macroarchaeological view of mobility\",\"authors\":\"P. Jeffrey Brantingham , Randall Haas , Steven L. Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Archaeological evidence of mobility is often analyzed using ethnographic-scale models of individual foraging trips and residential moves as a point of reference. Due to site formation processes and the limitations of geochronology, the archaeological record rarely offers the kind of fine-grained resolution needed to identify mobility events at this scale. Here we explore an alternative, macroarchaeological approach that asks how site occupation patterns in a region balance the evolutionary tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. We use a statistical point process model that equates independent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploration and dependent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploitation. We evaluate the theoretical expectations against the archaeological record of North America using radiocarbon dates from multi-occupation sites. We find strong clustering at short waiting-time intervals of less than under 1000 years, consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploitation at those scales. At longer time scales, waiting times are consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploration. Implications for social learning and niche construction models are explored.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Archaeological evidence of mobility is often analyzed using ethnographic-scale models of individual foraging trips and residential moves as a point of reference. Due to site formation processes and the limitations of geochronology, the archaeological record rarely offers the kind of fine-grained resolution needed to identify mobility events at this scale. Here we explore an alternative, macroarchaeological approach that asks how site occupation patterns in a region balance the evolutionary tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. We use a statistical point process model that equates independent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploration and dependent-in-time occupations with mobility-driven exploitation. We evaluate the theoretical expectations against the archaeological record of North America using radiocarbon dates from multi-occupation sites. We find strong clustering at short waiting-time intervals of less than under 1000 years, consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploitation at those scales. At longer time scales, waiting times are consistent with a model of mobility-driven exploration. Implications for social learning and niche construction models are explored.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.