{"title":"非隔离DC-DC变换器的时间最优有限控制集模型预测控制","authors":"Thibaut Harzig, Brandon Grainger","doi":"10.1049/elp2.12456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The authors propose a time-optimal finite control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) formulation, generalised to the three most common non-isolated DC–DC converters (buck, boost, buck–boost) tracking a constant switching frequency. The generalised switching model is used to formulate natural trajectories and the internal dynamic model for all three converters. The proposed FCS-MPC also allows the control designer to implement current and voltage constraints to limit current spikes and voltage deviations, respectively. The proposed FCS-MPC is compared to classical FCS-MPC and boundary controllers that also use natural trajectories for time optimality but at the cost of large voltage deviations. Classical FCS-MPC, time-optimal boundary control and the proposed FCS-MPC have been implemented in PLECS for all three converters. The current constraint does not impact control performance while the voltage constraint improves voltage deviation performances without significantly impacting the control speed compared to time-optimal boundary control. Finally, a hardware implementation of the proposed FCS-MPC on a buck converter proves that the control scheme is time optimal and mitigates current spikes while operating at a constant switching frequency at steady-state.</p>","PeriodicalId":13352,"journal":{"name":"Iet Electric Power Applications","volume":"18 11","pages":"1626-1637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/elp2.12456","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-optimal finite control set model predictive control of non-isolated DC–DC converters\",\"authors\":\"Thibaut Harzig, Brandon Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/elp2.12456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The authors propose a time-optimal finite control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) formulation, generalised to the three most common non-isolated DC–DC converters (buck, boost, buck–boost) tracking a constant switching frequency. The generalised switching model is used to formulate natural trajectories and the internal dynamic model for all three converters. The proposed FCS-MPC also allows the control designer to implement current and voltage constraints to limit current spikes and voltage deviations, respectively. The proposed FCS-MPC is compared to classical FCS-MPC and boundary controllers that also use natural trajectories for time optimality but at the cost of large voltage deviations. Classical FCS-MPC, time-optimal boundary control and the proposed FCS-MPC have been implemented in PLECS for all three converters. The current constraint does not impact control performance while the voltage constraint improves voltage deviation performances without significantly impacting the control speed compared to time-optimal boundary control. Finally, a hardware implementation of the proposed FCS-MPC on a buck converter proves that the control scheme is time optimal and mitigates current spikes while operating at a constant switching frequency at steady-state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iet Electric Power Applications\",\"volume\":\"18 11\",\"pages\":\"1626-1637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/elp2.12456\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iet Electric Power Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/elp2.12456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iet Electric Power Applications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/elp2.12456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time-optimal finite control set model predictive control of non-isolated DC–DC converters
The authors propose a time-optimal finite control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) formulation, generalised to the three most common non-isolated DC–DC converters (buck, boost, buck–boost) tracking a constant switching frequency. The generalised switching model is used to formulate natural trajectories and the internal dynamic model for all three converters. The proposed FCS-MPC also allows the control designer to implement current and voltage constraints to limit current spikes and voltage deviations, respectively. The proposed FCS-MPC is compared to classical FCS-MPC and boundary controllers that also use natural trajectories for time optimality but at the cost of large voltage deviations. Classical FCS-MPC, time-optimal boundary control and the proposed FCS-MPC have been implemented in PLECS for all three converters. The current constraint does not impact control performance while the voltage constraint improves voltage deviation performances without significantly impacting the control speed compared to time-optimal boundary control. Finally, a hardware implementation of the proposed FCS-MPC on a buck converter proves that the control scheme is time optimal and mitigates current spikes while operating at a constant switching frequency at steady-state.
期刊介绍:
IET Electric Power Applications publishes papers of a high technical standard with a suitable balance of practice and theory. The scope covers a wide range of applications and apparatus in the power field. In addition to papers focussing on the design and development of electrical equipment, papers relying on analysis are also sought, provided that the arguments are conveyed succinctly and the conclusions are clear.
The scope of the journal includes the following:
The design and analysis of motors and generators of all sizes
Rotating electrical machines
Linear machines
Actuators
Power transformers
Railway traction machines and drives
Variable speed drives
Machines and drives for electrically powered vehicles
Industrial and non-industrial applications and processes
Current Special Issue. Call for papers:
Progress in Electric Machines, Power Converters and their Control for Wave Energy Generation - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_EPA_CFP_PEMPCCWEG.pdf