Narendranath Epperla, Melanie Lucero, Tom Bailey, Laura Mirams, Jolenta Cheung, Mona Amet, Gary Milligan, Lei Chen
{"title":"复发或难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者CAR - t细胞治疗后使用loncastuximab tesirine的结果。","authors":"Narendranath Epperla, Melanie Lucero, Tom Bailey, Laura Mirams, Jolenta Cheung, Mona Amet, Gary Milligan, Lei Chen","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01195-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine (lonca) following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) progression/failure is unknown. Hence, we sought to examine real-world use and outcomes of lonca following CAR-T in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the USA. In this retrospective study, we included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with R/R DLBCL who received lonca monotherapy as third- (3 L) or fourth line (4 L) treatment after progressing on second line (2 L) or 3 L CAR-T, respectively. Post-CAR-T lonca outcomes included response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete response [CR] rate), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis with 95 receiving lonca following 2 L CAR-T (median age:66 years; 61% male) and 23 following 3 L CAR-T (median age:57 years; 43% male). Patients with 2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca had an ORR of 73% (CR rate of 34%). With a median follow-up of 8.5 months following lonca initiation, median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 months were 68%, 77%, and 84%, respectively. Patients with 3 L CAR-T/4 L lonca had an ORR of 78% (CR rate of 17%). With a median follow-up of 13 months following lonca initiation, the median DOR and PFS were 7.6 and 12.0 months, while median OS was not reached. OS at 12 months was 95%. In this study, we found that lonca monotherapy was an effective treatment option in R/R DLBCL in 3 L and 4 L settings including those who were resistant to or progressed after CAR-T.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes with loncastuximab tesirine following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Narendranath Epperla, Melanie Lucero, Tom Bailey, Laura Mirams, Jolenta Cheung, Mona Amet, Gary Milligan, Lei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-024-01195-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine (lonca) following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) progression/failure is unknown. Hence, we sought to examine real-world use and outcomes of lonca following CAR-T in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the USA. In this retrospective study, we included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with R/R DLBCL who received lonca monotherapy as third- (3 L) or fourth line (4 L) treatment after progressing on second line (2 L) or 3 L CAR-T, respectively. Post-CAR-T lonca outcomes included response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete response [CR] rate), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis with 95 receiving lonca following 2 L CAR-T (median age:66 years; 61% male) and 23 following 3 L CAR-T (median age:57 years; 43% male). Patients with 2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca had an ORR of 73% (CR rate of 34%). With a median follow-up of 8.5 months following lonca initiation, median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 months were 68%, 77%, and 84%, respectively. Patients with 3 L CAR-T/4 L lonca had an ORR of 78% (CR rate of 17%). With a median follow-up of 13 months following lonca initiation, the median DOR and PFS were 7.6 and 12.0 months, while median OS was not reached. OS at 12 months was 95%. In this study, we found that lonca monotherapy was an effective treatment option in R/R DLBCL in 3 L and 4 L settings including those who were resistant to or progressed after CAR-T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01195-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01195-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
嵌合抗原受体t细胞治疗(CAR-T)进展/失败后使用lonca的疗效尚不清楚。因此,我们试图研究在美国复发或难治性(R/R)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中CAR-T后lonca的实际应用和结果。在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了患有R/R DLBCL的成年人(年龄≥18岁),他们分别在接受二线(2l)或3l CAR-T治疗后接受长期单药治疗三线(3l)或四线(4l)治疗。car - t治疗后的预后包括缓解率(总缓解率[ORR]和完全缓解率[CR])、缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。共有118名患者被纳入分析,其中95名患者在接受2 L CAR-T治疗后接受lonca治疗(中位年龄:66岁;61%为男性),23例接受3l CAR-T治疗(中位年龄:57岁;43%的男性)。2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca的患者ORR为73% (CR率为34%)。lonca起始后的中位随访时间为8.5个月,中位DOR、PFS和OS均未达到。12个月时DOR、PFS和OS分别为68%、77%和84%。3l CAR-T/ 4l lonca的患者ORR为78% (CR率为17%)。lonca开始后的中位随访时间为13个月,中位DOR和PFS分别为7.6和12.0个月,而中位OS未达到。12个月的生存率为95%。在这项研究中,我们发现lonca单药治疗是3l和4l情况下R/R DLBCL的有效治疗选择,包括那些对CAR-T有耐药性或在CAR-T后进展的患者。
Outcomes with loncastuximab tesirine following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
The efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine (lonca) following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) progression/failure is unknown. Hence, we sought to examine real-world use and outcomes of lonca following CAR-T in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the USA. In this retrospective study, we included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with R/R DLBCL who received lonca monotherapy as third- (3 L) or fourth line (4 L) treatment after progressing on second line (2 L) or 3 L CAR-T, respectively. Post-CAR-T lonca outcomes included response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete response [CR] rate), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis with 95 receiving lonca following 2 L CAR-T (median age:66 years; 61% male) and 23 following 3 L CAR-T (median age:57 years; 43% male). Patients with 2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca had an ORR of 73% (CR rate of 34%). With a median follow-up of 8.5 months following lonca initiation, median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 months were 68%, 77%, and 84%, respectively. Patients with 3 L CAR-T/4 L lonca had an ORR of 78% (CR rate of 17%). With a median follow-up of 13 months following lonca initiation, the median DOR and PFS were 7.6 and 12.0 months, while median OS was not reached. OS at 12 months was 95%. In this study, we found that lonca monotherapy was an effective treatment option in R/R DLBCL in 3 L and 4 L settings including those who were resistant to or progressed after CAR-T.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.