机械模型和高斯过程模型在菠菜幼体冷藏过程细菌生长预测中的应用。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417
Sriya Sunil, Sarah I Murphy, Ruixi Chen, Wei Chen, Joseph Guinness, Li-Qun Zhang, Renata Ivanek, Martin Wiedmann
{"title":"机械模型和高斯过程模型在菠菜幼体冷藏过程细菌生长预测中的应用。","authors":"Sriya Sunil, Sarah I Murphy, Ruixi Chen, Wei Chen, Joseph Guinness, Li-Qun Zhang, Renata Ivanek, Martin Wiedmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models that predict bacterial growth in food products can help industry with decision-making with regard to microbial food spoilage. Such models have recently been developed using machine learning (ML) rather than a mechanistic understanding of bacterial growth. Thus, our aim was to compare the performance of mechanistic (M) models and the Gaussian process (GP) model (i.e., an ML approach) for predicting bacterial growth on spinach from a US-based supply chain as well as a China-based supply chain; models were developed using previously published data, as well as new data collected in this study from the China-based supply chain. For the packaged spinach collected in this study from the China-based supply chain, the mean net growth of aerobic, mesophilic bacteria over 10 days of shelf life was 1.16 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 11, local distribution) and 1.29 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 8, eCommerce distribution); bacterial growth on spinach did not differ significantly by distribution channel. The data obtained in this study, as well as previously published data on the growth of (i) individual bacterial strains (i.e., strain-level growth) and (ii) the overall bacterial population on baby spinach (i.e., population-level growth), were used to fit models. Specifically, GP models were fit to population-level growth data only, while M models were fit to strain-level and population-level growth data. The RMSE values for the M models (i.e., 0.72, 0.77 and 1.09 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for three M models assessed here) and GP models (i.e., 0.68 and 0.81 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for the two GP models assessed here) are similar, which suggests that both M and GP models show comparable accuracy at predicting bacterial growth on spinach.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Mechanistic Models and the Gaussian Process Model to Predict Bacterial Growth on Baby Spinach During Refrigerated Storage.\",\"authors\":\"Sriya Sunil, Sarah I Murphy, Ruixi Chen, Wei Chen, Joseph Guinness, Li-Qun Zhang, Renata Ivanek, Martin Wiedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Models that predict bacterial growth in food products can help industry with decision-making with regard to microbial food spoilage. Such models have recently been developed using machine learning (ML) rather than a mechanistic understanding of bacterial growth. Thus, our aim was to compare the performance of mechanistic (M) models and the Gaussian process (GP) model (i.e., an ML approach) for predicting bacterial growth on spinach from a US-based supply chain as well as a China-based supply chain; models were developed using previously published data, as well as new data collected in this study from the China-based supply chain. For the packaged spinach collected in this study from the China-based supply chain, the mean net growth of aerobic, mesophilic bacteria over 10 days of shelf life was 1.16 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 11, local distribution) and 1.29 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 8, eCommerce distribution); bacterial growth on spinach did not differ significantly by distribution channel. The data obtained in this study, as well as previously published data on the growth of (i) individual bacterial strains (i.e., strain-level growth) and (ii) the overall bacterial population on baby spinach (i.e., population-level growth), were used to fit models. Specifically, GP models were fit to population-level growth data only, while M models were fit to strain-level and population-level growth data. The RMSE values for the M models (i.e., 0.72, 0.77 and 1.09 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for three M models assessed here) and GP models (i.e., 0.68 and 0.81 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for the two GP models assessed here) are similar, which suggests that both M and GP models show comparable accuracy at predicting bacterial growth on spinach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测食品中细菌生长的模型可以帮助工业界做出有关微生物食品腐败的决策。这种模型最近是使用机器学习(ML)而不是对细菌生长的机械理解来开发的。因此,我们的目的是比较机制(M)模型和高斯过程(GP)模型(即ML方法)的性能,以预测来自美国供应链和中国供应链的菠菜上的细菌生长;模型是根据先前发表的数据以及本研究从中国供应链收集的新数据开发的。对于本研究从中国供应链收集的包装菠菜,在10天的保质期内,好氧、中嗜酸性细菌的平均净增长率为1.16 log10 (n = 11,当地分销)和1.29 log10 (n = 8,电子商务分销);不同销售渠道对菠菜细菌生长无显著影响。本研究中获得的数据,以及之前发表的关于(i)单个菌株(即菌株水平生长)和(ii)婴儿菠菜上的总体细菌种群(即种群水平生长)的生长数据,用于拟合模型。其中,GP模型只适合种群水平的增长数据,而M模型适合菌株水平和种群水平的增长数据。M模型的RMSE值(即0.72,0.77和1.09 log10 CFU/g,对于这里评估的三个M模型)和GP模型(即0.68和0.81 log10 CFU/g,对于这里评估的两个GP模型)相似,这表明M和GP模型在预测菠菜细菌生长方面具有相当的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Mechanistic Models and the Gaussian Process Model to Predict Bacterial Growth on Baby Spinach During Refrigerated Storage.

Models that predict bacterial growth in food products can help industry with decision-making with regard to microbial food spoilage. Such models have recently been developed using machine learning (ML) rather than a mechanistic understanding of bacterial growth. Thus, our aim was to compare the performance of mechanistic (M) models and the Gaussian process (GP) model (i.e., an ML approach) for predicting bacterial growth on spinach from a US-based supply chain as well as a China-based supply chain; models were developed using previously published data, as well as new data collected in this study from the China-based supply chain. For the packaged spinach collected in this study from the China-based supply chain, the mean net growth of aerobic, mesophilic bacteria over 10 days of shelf life was 1.16 log10 (n = 11, local distribution) and 1.29 log10 (n = 8, eCommerce distribution); bacterial growth on spinach did not differ significantly by distribution channel. The data obtained in this study, as well as previously published data on the growth of (i) individual bacterial strains (i.e., strain-level growth) and (ii) the overall bacterial population on baby spinach (i.e., population-level growth), were used to fit models. Specifically, GP models were fit to population-level growth data only, while M models were fit to strain-level and population-level growth data. The RMSE values for the M models (i.e., 0.72, 0.77 and 1.09 log10 CFU/g, for three M models assessed here) and GP models (i.e., 0.68 and 0.81 log10 CFU/g, for the two GP models assessed here) are similar, which suggests that both M and GP models show comparable accuracy at predicting bacterial growth on spinach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Determination of an Effective Sanitizing Procedure for Listeria innocua in Personal Protective Equipment Used in Dairy Facilities. Melamine and Cyanuric Acid in Milk and Their Quantities, Analytical Methods and Exposure Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Analysis of Method Performance for Quantitative Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in Queso Fresco Cheese. Application of QuEChERS for analysis of contaminants in dairy products: a review. Health Inspections of Restaurant Establishments in the Attica Region, Greece. Non-compliance Data Within the Food Hygiene Sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1