植入式神经刺激装置的随机对照试验方案报告指南:SPIRIT-iNeurostim扩展。

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102933
Rebecca Bresnahan, Sue Copley, Sam Eldabe, Simon Thomson, Richard B North, Ganesan Baranidharan, Robert M Levy, Gary S Collins, Rod S Taylor, Rui V Duarte
{"title":"植入式神经刺激装置的随机对照试验方案报告指南:SPIRIT-iNeurostim扩展。","authors":"Rebecca Bresnahan, Sue Copley, Sam Eldabe, Simon Thomson, Richard B North, Ganesan Baranidharan, Robert M Levy, Gary S Collins, Rod S Taylor, Rui V Duarte","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement has improved the quality of reporting of randomised trial protocols. Extensions to the SPIRIT statement are needed to address specific issues of trial protocol reporting, including those relevant to particular types of interventions. Methodological and reporting deficiencies in protocols of clinical trials of implantable neurostimulation devices are common. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension is a new reporting guideline for randomised controlled trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPIRIT-iNeurostim was developed using the EQUATOR methodological framework including a literature review and expert consultation to generate an initial list of candidate items. The candidate items were included in a two-round Delphi survey, discussed at an international consensus meeting (42 stakeholders including healthcare professionals, methodologists, journal editors and industry representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands and other countries), and refined through a checklist pilot (18 stakeholders).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The initial extension item list included 42 candidate items relevant to SPIRIT-iNeurostim. We received 132 responses in the first round of the Delphi survey and 99 responses in the second round. Participants suggested an additional 14 candidate items for SPIRIT-iNeurostim during the first round of the survey, and those achieving initial consensus were discussed at the consensus meeting. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension includes 5 new checklist items, including one item for reporting the neurostimulation intervention comprising a separate checklist of 14 items.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension will help to promote increased transparency, clarity, and completeness of reporting trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices. It will assist journal editors, peer-reviewers, and readers to better interpret the appropriateness and generalisability of the methods used for a planned clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Abbott, Boston Scientific Corp., Mainstay Medical, Medtronic Ltd, Nevro Corp., and Saluda Medical.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"78 ","pages":"102933"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting guidelines for protocols of randomised controlled trials of implantable neurostimulation devices: the SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Bresnahan, Sue Copley, Sam Eldabe, Simon Thomson, Richard B North, Ganesan Baranidharan, Robert M Levy, Gary S Collins, Rod S Taylor, Rui V Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement has improved the quality of reporting of randomised trial protocols. Extensions to the SPIRIT statement are needed to address specific issues of trial protocol reporting, including those relevant to particular types of interventions. Methodological and reporting deficiencies in protocols of clinical trials of implantable neurostimulation devices are common. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension is a new reporting guideline for randomised controlled trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPIRIT-iNeurostim was developed using the EQUATOR methodological framework including a literature review and expert consultation to generate an initial list of candidate items. The candidate items were included in a two-round Delphi survey, discussed at an international consensus meeting (42 stakeholders including healthcare professionals, methodologists, journal editors and industry representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands and other countries), and refined through a checklist pilot (18 stakeholders).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The initial extension item list included 42 candidate items relevant to SPIRIT-iNeurostim. We received 132 responses in the first round of the Delphi survey and 99 responses in the second round. Participants suggested an additional 14 candidate items for SPIRIT-iNeurostim during the first round of the survey, and those achieving initial consensus were discussed at the consensus meeting. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension includes 5 new checklist items, including one item for reporting the neurostimulation intervention comprising a separate checklist of 14 items.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension will help to promote increased transparency, clarity, and completeness of reporting trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices. It will assist journal editors, peer-reviewers, and readers to better interpret the appropriateness and generalisability of the methods used for a planned clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Abbott, Boston Scientific Corp., Mainstay Medical, Medtronic Ltd, Nevro Corp., and Saluda Medical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"102933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102933\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:标准方案项目:介入性试验建议(SPIRIT)声明提高了随机试验方案报告的质量。需要对SPIRIT声明进行扩展,以解决试验方案报告的具体问题,包括与特定类型干预措施有关的问题。植入式神经刺激装置临床试验的方法学和报告缺陷是常见的。SPIRIT-iNeurostim扩展是评估植入式神经刺激装置的随机对照试验方案的新报告指南。方法:采用EQUATOR方法框架开发SPIRIT-iNeurostim,包括文献综述和专家咨询,以生成候选项目的初始列表。候选项目被纳入两轮德尔菲调查,在国际共识会议上进行讨论(来自美国、英国、荷兰和其他国家的42名利益相关者,包括卫生保健专业人员、方法学家、期刊编辑和行业代表),并通过清单试点(18名利益相关者)进行完善。结果:最初的扩展项目列表包括42个与SPIRIT-iNeurostim相关的候选项目。我们在第一轮德尔菲调查中收到132份回复,在第二轮中收到99份回复。在第一轮调查中,与会者建议增加14个“SPIRIT-iNeurostim”候选项目,并在协商一致会议上讨论达成初步共识的项目。SPIRIT-iNeurostim扩展包括5个新的检查表项目,其中一个项目用于报告神经刺激干预,包括一个单独的14个项目的检查表。解释:SPIRIT-iNeurostim扩展将有助于提高评估植入式神经刺激装置的报告试验方案的透明度、清晰度和完整性。它将帮助期刊编辑、同行审稿人和读者更好地解释用于计划临床试验的方法的适当性和普遍性。资金来源:雅培、波士顿科学公司、中流医疗、美敦力有限公司、nevo公司和Saluda医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reporting guidelines for protocols of randomised controlled trials of implantable neurostimulation devices: the SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension.

Background: The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement has improved the quality of reporting of randomised trial protocols. Extensions to the SPIRIT statement are needed to address specific issues of trial protocol reporting, including those relevant to particular types of interventions. Methodological and reporting deficiencies in protocols of clinical trials of implantable neurostimulation devices are common. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension is a new reporting guideline for randomised controlled trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices.

Methods: SPIRIT-iNeurostim was developed using the EQUATOR methodological framework including a literature review and expert consultation to generate an initial list of candidate items. The candidate items were included in a two-round Delphi survey, discussed at an international consensus meeting (42 stakeholders including healthcare professionals, methodologists, journal editors and industry representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands and other countries), and refined through a checklist pilot (18 stakeholders).

Findings: The initial extension item list included 42 candidate items relevant to SPIRIT-iNeurostim. We received 132 responses in the first round of the Delphi survey and 99 responses in the second round. Participants suggested an additional 14 candidate items for SPIRIT-iNeurostim during the first round of the survey, and those achieving initial consensus were discussed at the consensus meeting. The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension includes 5 new checklist items, including one item for reporting the neurostimulation intervention comprising a separate checklist of 14 items.

Interpretation: The SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension will help to promote increased transparency, clarity, and completeness of reporting trial protocols evaluating implantable neurostimulation devices. It will assist journal editors, peer-reviewers, and readers to better interpret the appropriateness and generalisability of the methods used for a planned clinical trial.

Funding: Abbott, Boston Scientific Corp., Mainstay Medical, Medtronic Ltd, Nevro Corp., and Saluda Medical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The effects of metformin and exercise training on cardiorespiratory, blood pressure, and metabolic adaptations across the spectrum of glucose dysregulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global complications among patients with mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Feasibility, accuracy, and effect of a rapid point-of-care serological test (SeroSelectTB) to identify presumptive pulmonary TB patients for confirmatory testing in Ethiopia, South Africa, and Tanzania: a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. Authors' reply: Comments regarding "Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Prediction of trajectories and outcomes in early-stage metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1