增强靶向剂量:低能光子脂醇增强放疗(LEPERT)用于肝癌患者。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14578
Daisuke Kawahara
{"title":"增强靶向剂量:低能光子脂醇增强放疗(LEPERT)用于肝癌患者。","authors":"Daisuke Kawahara","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study proposes a novel approach, \"Low-energy photon Lipiodol-Enhanced Radiotherapy\" (LEPERT), for patients with liver cancer. Moreover, we evaluate the dose difference of the conventional treatment planning with 10 MV X-ray beam (MV-plan) and LEPERT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computed tomography (CT) was modeled with the Monte Carlo simulation. For LEPERT, 120 kV X-ray beams collimated with CT were irradiated on a virtual tumor filled with Lipiodol at 10-50 mg/mL, which was inserted into a whole-body phantom. A prescribed dose of 40 Gy/4fr was irradiated to achieve D<sub>95%</sub> of the target. The doses to the target and organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone, normal liver, spinal cord, and kidneys, were evaluated by comparison with conventional radiotherapy with a 10 MV VMAT plan (MV-plan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in the effective energy and off-axis ratio between the measurements and simulations were within 2 keV and 3%, respectively. The D<sub>2%</sub> of tumors exceeded 130% of the prescribed dose at 50 mg. The difference in the D<sub>98%</sub> of the tumor between LEPERT and MV-plan was within 0.7 Gy. The V<sub>5Gy</sub> of the normal liver (>40 mg/mL) was lower for LEPERT than for MV-plan. The V<sub>20Gy</sub> of the normal liver (>10 mg/mL) for LEPERT was over 80% lower than that for MV-plan. Dose constraints for the OARs were satisfied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LEPERT can selectively enhanced only the tumor region with sparing the OAR dose. It could be a novel and effective treatment technique in the point that the treatment machine is a general CT device.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing targeted doses: Low-energy photon lipiodol-enhanced radiotherapy (LEPERT) for liver cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kawahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study proposes a novel approach, \\\"Low-energy photon Lipiodol-Enhanced Radiotherapy\\\" (LEPERT), for patients with liver cancer. Moreover, we evaluate the dose difference of the conventional treatment planning with 10 MV X-ray beam (MV-plan) and LEPERT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computed tomography (CT) was modeled with the Monte Carlo simulation. For LEPERT, 120 kV X-ray beams collimated with CT were irradiated on a virtual tumor filled with Lipiodol at 10-50 mg/mL, which was inserted into a whole-body phantom. A prescribed dose of 40 Gy/4fr was irradiated to achieve D<sub>95%</sub> of the target. The doses to the target and organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone, normal liver, spinal cord, and kidneys, were evaluated by comparison with conventional radiotherapy with a 10 MV VMAT plan (MV-plan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in the effective energy and off-axis ratio between the measurements and simulations were within 2 keV and 3%, respectively. The D<sub>2%</sub> of tumors exceeded 130% of the prescribed dose at 50 mg. The difference in the D<sub>98%</sub> of the tumor between LEPERT and MV-plan was within 0.7 Gy. The V<sub>5Gy</sub> of the normal liver (>40 mg/mL) was lower for LEPERT than for MV-plan. The V<sub>20Gy</sub> of the normal liver (>10 mg/mL) for LEPERT was over 80% lower than that for MV-plan. Dose constraints for the OARs were satisfied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LEPERT can selectively enhanced only the tumor region with sparing the OAR dose. It could be a novel and effective treatment technique in the point that the treatment machine is a general CT device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14578\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究提出了一种治疗肝癌的新方法——“低能光子脂醇增强放疗”(LEPERT)。此外,我们还评估了10 MV x射线束常规治疗方案(MV-plan)和LEPERT治疗方案的剂量差异。方法:采用蒙特卡罗方法对CT进行建模。对于LEPERT, 120 kV x射线束与CT准直照射在一个充满10-50 mg/mL的Lipiodol的虚拟肿瘤上,将其插入全身幻象中。辐照剂量为40gy /4fr,达到目标的D95%。通过与10 MV VMAT计划(MV-plan)的常规放疗进行比较,评估靶和危险器官(OARs),如骨、正常肝脏、脊髓和肾脏的剂量。结果:测量值与模拟值的有效能量和离轴率差异分别在2 keV和3%以内。在50mg剂量下,肿瘤的D2%超过了处方剂量的130%。LEPERT和MV-plan的肿瘤D98%的差异在0.7 Gy以内。LEPERT组正常肝脏V5Gy (40mg /mL)低于mv组。LEPERT组正常肝脏V20Gy (bbb10 mg/mL)比MV-plan组低80%以上。桨的剂量限制是满足的。结论:LEPERT具有选择性增强肿瘤区域的作用,可节省OAR剂量。从治疗机是一种普通的CT设备的角度来看,它可能是一种新颖有效的治疗技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing targeted doses: Low-energy photon lipiodol-enhanced radiotherapy (LEPERT) for liver cancer patients.

Objectives: This study proposes a novel approach, "Low-energy photon Lipiodol-Enhanced Radiotherapy" (LEPERT), for patients with liver cancer. Moreover, we evaluate the dose difference of the conventional treatment planning with 10 MV X-ray beam (MV-plan) and LEPERT.

Methods: The computed tomography (CT) was modeled with the Monte Carlo simulation. For LEPERT, 120 kV X-ray beams collimated with CT were irradiated on a virtual tumor filled with Lipiodol at 10-50 mg/mL, which was inserted into a whole-body phantom. A prescribed dose of 40 Gy/4fr was irradiated to achieve D95% of the target. The doses to the target and organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone, normal liver, spinal cord, and kidneys, were evaluated by comparison with conventional radiotherapy with a 10 MV VMAT plan (MV-plan).

Results: Differences in the effective energy and off-axis ratio between the measurements and simulations were within 2 keV and 3%, respectively. The D2% of tumors exceeded 130% of the prescribed dose at 50 mg. The difference in the D98% of the tumor between LEPERT and MV-plan was within 0.7 Gy. The V5Gy of the normal liver (>40 mg/mL) was lower for LEPERT than for MV-plan. The V20Gy of the normal liver (>10 mg/mL) for LEPERT was over 80% lower than that for MV-plan. Dose constraints for the OARs were satisfied.

Conclusion: The LEPERT can selectively enhanced only the tumor region with sparing the OAR dose. It could be a novel and effective treatment technique in the point that the treatment machine is a general CT device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Impact of acceleration treatment on treatment plan and delivery qualities in tomotherapy for lung cancer. T2-weighted imaging of rectal cancer using a 3D fast spin echo sequence with and without deep learning reconstruction: A reader study. Determination of appropriate energy threshold range for accurate estimation of effective atomic number considering statistical uncertainty in photon-counting techniques. A comparative analysis of deep learning architectures with data augmentation and multichannel input for locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy. Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1