中外预防医学合作项目案例学习的调查与实施。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06372-4
Zhipeng Liu, Guanqiong Na, Lihua Liu, Sicong Tian, Yujuan Shan
{"title":"中外预防医学合作项目案例学习的调查与实施。","authors":"Zhipeng Liu, Guanqiong Na, Lihua Liu, Sicong Tian, Yujuan Shan","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06372-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current objective of preventive medicine reform is to guarantee that clinical medical students possess a comprehensive understanding of preventive medicine concepts, knowledge, and skills. Previously, case-based learning (CBL) was mostly employed to reform the clinical medicine curriculum, but there was a lack of reform in preventive medicine for clinical students in Sino-foreign joint training programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of case-based learning in the Sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 79 clinical medical students from the Sino-foreign joint program at Wenzhou Medical University were selected as participants to engage in 10 case-based learning sessions. The effectiveness of the instruction was assessed by analyzing the final exam scores and questionnaire responses, which encompassed instructor evaluation, self-assessment, and course learning effectiveness evaluation (CLEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to the traditional approach, which yielded a final score of 69.2, the case-based students achieved an average of 77.62. The results of instructor evaluation showed that students' academic performance, problem-solving capabilities, research cooperation and communication, and learning attitude all improved significantly following case-based learning (P < 0.05). The self-assessment scores for all five case discussion courses exceeded 75 points, suggesting that students believed their overall competence had increased significantly. The CLEE demonstrated that CBL had a positive impact on students' learning and was highly advantageous for students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is deserving of active promotion in medical education reform that case-based learning can enhance students' comprehensive quality and classroom participation. Further research is required to ascertain whether it can replace traditional teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"1390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation and implementation of case-based learning in the sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Zhipeng Liu, Guanqiong Na, Lihua Liu, Sicong Tian, Yujuan Shan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-024-06372-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current objective of preventive medicine reform is to guarantee that clinical medical students possess a comprehensive understanding of preventive medicine concepts, knowledge, and skills. Previously, case-based learning (CBL) was mostly employed to reform the clinical medicine curriculum, but there was a lack of reform in preventive medicine for clinical students in Sino-foreign joint training programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of case-based learning in the Sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 79 clinical medical students from the Sino-foreign joint program at Wenzhou Medical University were selected as participants to engage in 10 case-based learning sessions. The effectiveness of the instruction was assessed by analyzing the final exam scores and questionnaire responses, which encompassed instructor evaluation, self-assessment, and course learning effectiveness evaluation (CLEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to the traditional approach, which yielded a final score of 69.2, the case-based students achieved an average of 77.62. The results of instructor evaluation showed that students' academic performance, problem-solving capabilities, research cooperation and communication, and learning attitude all improved significantly following case-based learning (P < 0.05). The self-assessment scores for all five case discussion courses exceeded 75 points, suggesting that students believed their overall competence had increased significantly. The CLEE demonstrated that CBL had a positive impact on students' learning and was highly advantageous for students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is deserving of active promotion in medical education reform that case-based learning can enhance students' comprehensive quality and classroom participation. Further research is required to ascertain whether it can replace traditional teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06372-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06372-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当前预防医学改革的目标是保证临床医学生对预防医学的概念、知识和技能有全面的了解。以往临床医学课程改革多采用案例学习(case-based learning, CBL)模式,中外联合培养临床学生预防医学课程改革较少。本研究旨在探讨个案学习在中外预防医学合作项目中的效果。方法:选取温州医科大学中外合作项目临床医学生79名,进行10个案例学习。通过分析期末考试成绩和问卷调查结果来评估教学效果,问卷调查包括教师评价、自我评价和课程学习效果评价(CLEE)。结果:与传统方法的最终得分69.2相比,案例教学法学生的平均得分为77.62。教师评价结果显示,案例学习后学生的学业成绩、问题解决能力、科研合作与交流能力、学习态度均有显著提高(P)。结论:案例学习能提高学生的综合素质和课堂参与度,值得在医学教育改革中积极推广。它是否能取代传统的教学方法还需要进一步的研究。试验注册:非临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation and implementation of case-based learning in the sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.

Background: The current objective of preventive medicine reform is to guarantee that clinical medical students possess a comprehensive understanding of preventive medicine concepts, knowledge, and skills. Previously, case-based learning (CBL) was mostly employed to reform the clinical medicine curriculum, but there was a lack of reform in preventive medicine for clinical students in Sino-foreign joint training programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of case-based learning in the Sino-foreign joint program of preventive medicine.

Methods: A total of 79 clinical medical students from the Sino-foreign joint program at Wenzhou Medical University were selected as participants to engage in 10 case-based learning sessions. The effectiveness of the instruction was assessed by analyzing the final exam scores and questionnaire responses, which encompassed instructor evaluation, self-assessment, and course learning effectiveness evaluation (CLEE).

Results: In contrast to the traditional approach, which yielded a final score of 69.2, the case-based students achieved an average of 77.62. The results of instructor evaluation showed that students' academic performance, problem-solving capabilities, research cooperation and communication, and learning attitude all improved significantly following case-based learning (P < 0.05). The self-assessment scores for all five case discussion courses exceeded 75 points, suggesting that students believed their overall competence had increased significantly. The CLEE demonstrated that CBL had a positive impact on students' learning and was highly advantageous for students.

Conclusions: It is deserving of active promotion in medical education reform that case-based learning can enhance students' comprehensive quality and classroom participation. Further research is required to ascertain whether it can replace traditional teaching methods.

Trial registration: Not clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
A mixed-methods study of a "Humanities in Course" model: improving caring abilities, climate, and satisfaction in pediatric nursing education. A workflow-based, digitally gamified teaching model for pathology education: a pilot study. Application of synthetic patient samples in biochemistry laboratory case-based learning course to improve biosafety. Psychological and attitudinal responses to death-related education: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study informed by terror management theory. Association between sources of nutrition information and self-perceived nutrition competence of healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1