辅助技术使用者低视力康复的随访:范围综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2433035
Hamidreza Aminparvin, Leif Henrichs, Claudine Auger, Shirley Dumassais, Judith Renaud, Walter Wittich
{"title":"辅助技术使用者低视力康复的随访:范围综述。","authors":"Hamidreza Aminparvin, Leif Henrichs, Claudine Auger, Shirley Dumassais, Judith Renaud, Walter Wittich","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2433035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assistive technology (AT) is crucial for aiding activities of daily living in individuals with visual impairment; yet, without systematic follow-up device abandonment rates remain high. This scoping review synthesizes existing literature on follow-up processes in individuals with visual impairment undergoing vision rehabilitation with AT. Employing the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this review comprehensively searched seven databases, identifying 1,061 articles, of which 43 were selected for analysis, using the concepts of <i>visual impairment, rehabilitation,</i> and <i>assistive technology.</i> The publications span from 1989 to 2022. Most studies (<i>n</i> = 36, 83%) utilized a mixed-methods design, and 51% (<i>n</i> = 22) originated from the United States. Devices for near vision were the most commonly prescribed type of AT. Follow-up methods included questionnaires and interviews, with most follow-ups conducted at the client's home. Follow-up timing varied across studies, whereby 37% (<i>n</i> = 16) occurred after one or more years and 33% (<i>n</i> = 14) between one week and four months. Three categories of outcome measures emerged: generic outcomes, task-specific outcomes, and a combination of both. The review identified several gaps in the literature, including a scarcity of research concerning follow-up of AT particularly for both the type and timing of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow-up in low vision rehabilitation for users of assistive technology: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Aminparvin, Leif Henrichs, Claudine Auger, Shirley Dumassais, Judith Renaud, Walter Wittich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2433035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assistive technology (AT) is crucial for aiding activities of daily living in individuals with visual impairment; yet, without systematic follow-up device abandonment rates remain high. This scoping review synthesizes existing literature on follow-up processes in individuals with visual impairment undergoing vision rehabilitation with AT. Employing the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this review comprehensively searched seven databases, identifying 1,061 articles, of which 43 were selected for analysis, using the concepts of <i>visual impairment, rehabilitation,</i> and <i>assistive technology.</i> The publications span from 1989 to 2022. Most studies (<i>n</i> = 36, 83%) utilized a mixed-methods design, and 51% (<i>n</i> = 22) originated from the United States. Devices for near vision were the most commonly prescribed type of AT. Follow-up methods included questionnaires and interviews, with most follow-ups conducted at the client's home. Follow-up timing varied across studies, whereby 37% (<i>n</i> = 16) occurred after one or more years and 33% (<i>n</i> = 14) between one week and four months. Three categories of outcome measures emerged: generic outcomes, task-specific outcomes, and a combination of both. The review identified several gaps in the literature, including a scarcity of research concerning follow-up of AT particularly for both the type and timing of follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2433035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2433035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助技术(AT)对于帮助视力障碍者进行日常生活活动至关重要;然而,如果没有系统的随访,器械弃用率仍然很高。本综述综合了现有的关于视力障碍患者接受AT视力康复的随访过程的文献。采用Arksey和O'Malley框架,本综述全面检索了7个数据库,确定了1061篇文章,其中43篇被选中进行分析,使用了视觉障碍、康复和辅助技术的概念。这些出版物的出版时间跨度为1989年至2022年。大多数研究(n = 36, 83%)采用混合方法设计,51% (n = 22)来自美国。近视力设备是最常用的AT类型。随访方法包括问卷调查和访谈,大多数随访在客户家中进行。随访时间因研究而异,其中37% (n = 16)发生在一年或更久之后,33% (n = 14)发生在一周至四个月之间。结果测量出现了三类:一般结果,特定任务结果,以及两者的结合。回顾发现了文献中的几个空白,包括缺乏关于AT随访的研究,特别是随访的类型和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Follow-up in low vision rehabilitation for users of assistive technology: a scoping review.

Assistive technology (AT) is crucial for aiding activities of daily living in individuals with visual impairment; yet, without systematic follow-up device abandonment rates remain high. This scoping review synthesizes existing literature on follow-up processes in individuals with visual impairment undergoing vision rehabilitation with AT. Employing the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this review comprehensively searched seven databases, identifying 1,061 articles, of which 43 were selected for analysis, using the concepts of visual impairment, rehabilitation, and assistive technology. The publications span from 1989 to 2022. Most studies (n = 36, 83%) utilized a mixed-methods design, and 51% (n = 22) originated from the United States. Devices for near vision were the most commonly prescribed type of AT. Follow-up methods included questionnaires and interviews, with most follow-ups conducted at the client's home. Follow-up timing varied across studies, whereby 37% (n = 16) occurred after one or more years and 33% (n = 14) between one week and four months. Three categories of outcome measures emerged: generic outcomes, task-specific outcomes, and a combination of both. The review identified several gaps in the literature, including a scarcity of research concerning follow-up of AT particularly for both the type and timing of follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot. Bridging gaps in technology adoption for disabilities. Estimating power wheelchair electronics lifespan based on real-world data. Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy. Design and development of a customized 3D-printed assistive device using modular 3D blocks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1