老年结直肠癌患者引入跨学科共享决策诊所后的结果

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.26635/6965.6476
Alison Jackson, Christopher Shaw, Brian O'Sullivan, Siva Govender, Jesse Fischer
{"title":"老年结直肠癌患者引入跨学科共享决策诊所后的结果","authors":"Alison Jackson, Christopher Shaw, Brian O'Sullivan, Siva Govender, Jesse Fischer","doi":"10.26635/6965.6476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is highest in older patients, who also have high rates of concurrent multimorbidity and frailty. Shared decision making is important when deciding treatment. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes before and after introduction of a shared decision-making (SDM) pathway, which includes an anaesthetist and geriatrician, for older patients with CRC at Waikato Hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective review of patients over 70 years of age considered for surgical resection was performed before (2018) and after (2020) introduction of the SDM pathway. Primary outcome was days alive out of hospital (DAOH) at 12 months. Data were collected on demographics, disease factors, specialist assessments, frailty and cognitive function, treatment, deviation from colorectal multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) recommendation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 169 patients were included. There were 103 males and the median age was 79 years (range 70-95). After the introduction of the SDM clinic, more patients underwent non-operative management (16.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.02) and had management that deviated from MDM recommendation (18.4% vs 4.9%, p=0.01). DAOH was marginally higher after introduction of the SDM clinic (358 vs 352, p=0.02). There was no difference in survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interdisciplinary SDM clinic for older patients with CRC is feasible in a tertiary hospital in New Zealand and may increase non-operative management and DAOH without impacting overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1606","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes following the introduction of an interdisciplinary shared decision-making clinic for older patients with colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Jackson, Christopher Shaw, Brian O'Sullivan, Siva Govender, Jesse Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is highest in older patients, who also have high rates of concurrent multimorbidity and frailty. Shared decision making is important when deciding treatment. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes before and after introduction of a shared decision-making (SDM) pathway, which includes an anaesthetist and geriatrician, for older patients with CRC at Waikato Hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective review of patients over 70 years of age considered for surgical resection was performed before (2018) and after (2020) introduction of the SDM pathway. Primary outcome was days alive out of hospital (DAOH) at 12 months. Data were collected on demographics, disease factors, specialist assessments, frailty and cognitive function, treatment, deviation from colorectal multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) recommendation and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 169 patients were included. There were 103 males and the median age was 79 years (range 70-95). After the introduction of the SDM clinic, more patients underwent non-operative management (16.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.02) and had management that deviated from MDM recommendation (18.4% vs 4.9%, p=0.01). DAOH was marginally higher after introduction of the SDM clinic (358 vs 352, p=0.02). There was no difference in survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interdisciplinary SDM clinic for older patients with CRC is feasible in a tertiary hospital in New Zealand and may increase non-operative management and DAOH without impacting overall survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"137 1606\",\"pages\":\"40-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率在老年患者中最高,他们同时也有高发病率的多病和虚弱。在决定治疗方案时,共同决策很重要。本研究的目的是比较在Waikato医院引入共享决策(SDM)途径(包括麻醉师和老年专家)之前和之后的结果。方法:回顾性分析在引入SDM通路之前(2018年)和之后(2020年)考虑手术切除的70岁以上患者。主要终点为12个月时的院外存活天数(DAOH)。收集人口统计学、疾病因素、专家评估、虚弱和认知功能、治疗、偏离结直肠多学科会议(MDM)建议和结果的数据。结果:共纳入169例患者。男性103例,中位年龄79岁(70-95岁)。引入SDM诊所后,更多的患者接受非手术管理(16.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.02),并且管理偏离MDM推荐(18.4% vs 4.9%, p=0.01)。引入SDM诊所后,DAOH略高(358比352,p=0.02)。生存率没有差异。结论:在新西兰三级医院为老年结直肠癌患者开设跨学科的SDM门诊是可行的,可以在不影响总生存的情况下增加非手术治疗和DAOH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes following the introduction of an interdisciplinary shared decision-making clinic for older patients with colorectal cancer.

Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is highest in older patients, who also have high rates of concurrent multimorbidity and frailty. Shared decision making is important when deciding treatment. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes before and after introduction of a shared decision-making (SDM) pathway, which includes an anaesthetist and geriatrician, for older patients with CRC at Waikato Hospital.

Method: Retrospective review of patients over 70 years of age considered for surgical resection was performed before (2018) and after (2020) introduction of the SDM pathway. Primary outcome was days alive out of hospital (DAOH) at 12 months. Data were collected on demographics, disease factors, specialist assessments, frailty and cognitive function, treatment, deviation from colorectal multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) recommendation and outcomes.

Results: In total, 169 patients were included. There were 103 males and the median age was 79 years (range 70-95). After the introduction of the SDM clinic, more patients underwent non-operative management (16.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.02) and had management that deviated from MDM recommendation (18.4% vs 4.9%, p=0.01). DAOH was marginally higher after introduction of the SDM clinic (358 vs 352, p=0.02). There was no difference in survival.

Conclusion: An interdisciplinary SDM clinic for older patients with CRC is feasible in a tertiary hospital in New Zealand and may increase non-operative management and DAOH without impacting overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. Delayed presentation of severe cervical myelopathy two years post-motorcycle accident: a case report. Does suicide in New Zealand follow a semi-lunar rhythm? How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system? Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1