推动错误信息生产和用户参与Facebook上令人牙痛的内容的因素。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241274282
Tamires de Sá Menezes, Mateus Martins Martini, Matheus Lotto, Olivia Santana Jorge, Ana Maria Jucá, Patricia Estefania Ayala Aguirre, Thiago Cruvinel
{"title":"推动错误信息生产和用户参与Facebook上令人牙痛的内容的因素。","authors":"Tamires de Sá Menezes, Mateus Martins Martini, Matheus Lotto, Olivia Santana Jorge, Ana Maria Jucá, Patricia Estefania Ayala Aguirre, Thiago Cruvinel","doi":"10.1177/14604582241274282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study characterized toothache-related Portuguese Facebook posts, identifying factors driving misinformation production and user engagement. <b>Methods:</b> Investigators qualitatively analyzed 500 posts published between August 2018 and August 2022, screening on language and theme. Posts were selected using CrowdTangle and assessed for motivation, author profile, content, sentiment, facticity, and format. The interaction metrics (total interactions/overperforming scores) were compared between groups of dichotomized characteristics, including time of publication. Data were evaluated by descriptive analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the path analysis by generalized structural equation modeling. <b>Results:</b> 39.6% of posts (<i>n</i> = 198) contained misinformation, significantly linked to noncommercial posts with positive sentiment, links, and videos from regular users motivated by financial motivation. Additionally, user engagement was only positively associated with business/health authors' profiles and the time of publication. <b>Conclusion:</b> Toothache-related posts often contain misinformation, shared by regular users in links and video formats, tied to positive sentiments, and generally with financial motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"14604582241274282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors driving misinformation production and user engagement with toothache content on Facebook.\",\"authors\":\"Tamires de Sá Menezes, Mateus Martins Martini, Matheus Lotto, Olivia Santana Jorge, Ana Maria Jucá, Patricia Estefania Ayala Aguirre, Thiago Cruvinel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582241274282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study characterized toothache-related Portuguese Facebook posts, identifying factors driving misinformation production and user engagement. <b>Methods:</b> Investigators qualitatively analyzed 500 posts published between August 2018 and August 2022, screening on language and theme. Posts were selected using CrowdTangle and assessed for motivation, author profile, content, sentiment, facticity, and format. The interaction metrics (total interactions/overperforming scores) were compared between groups of dichotomized characteristics, including time of publication. Data were evaluated by descriptive analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the path analysis by generalized structural equation modeling. <b>Results:</b> 39.6% of posts (<i>n</i> = 198) contained misinformation, significantly linked to noncommercial posts with positive sentiment, links, and videos from regular users motivated by financial motivation. Additionally, user engagement was only positively associated with business/health authors' profiles and the time of publication. <b>Conclusion:</b> Toothache-related posts often contain misinformation, shared by regular users in links and video formats, tied to positive sentiments, and generally with financial motivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"14604582241274282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241274282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241274282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究描述了与牙痛相关的葡萄牙语Facebook帖子,确定了导致错误信息产生和用户参与的因素。方法:对2018年8月至2022年8月发布的500篇微博进行定性分析,对语言和主题进行筛选。文章是通过CrowdTangle选择的,并对动机、作者简介、内容、情感、真实性和格式进行评估。相互作用指标(总相互作用/超额得分)在二分类特征组之间进行比较,包括发表时间。采用描述性分析、Mann-Whitney U检验和广义结构方程模型的通径分析对数据进行评价。结果:39.6%的帖子(n = 198)包含错误信息,与具有积极情绪的非商业帖子、链接和受经济动机驱动的普通用户的视频显著相关。此外,用户参与度仅与商业/健康作者的个人资料和发布时间呈正相关。结论:与牙痛相关的帖子通常包含错误信息,由普通用户以链接和视频形式分享,与积极情绪有关,通常带有经济动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors driving misinformation production and user engagement with toothache content on Facebook.

Objectives: This study characterized toothache-related Portuguese Facebook posts, identifying factors driving misinformation production and user engagement. Methods: Investigators qualitatively analyzed 500 posts published between August 2018 and August 2022, screening on language and theme. Posts were selected using CrowdTangle and assessed for motivation, author profile, content, sentiment, facticity, and format. The interaction metrics (total interactions/overperforming scores) were compared between groups of dichotomized characteristics, including time of publication. Data were evaluated by descriptive analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the path analysis by generalized structural equation modeling. Results: 39.6% of posts (n = 198) contained misinformation, significantly linked to noncommercial posts with positive sentiment, links, and videos from regular users motivated by financial motivation. Additionally, user engagement was only positively associated with business/health authors' profiles and the time of publication. Conclusion: Toothache-related posts often contain misinformation, shared by regular users in links and video formats, tied to positive sentiments, and generally with financial motivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Researching public health datasets in the era of deep learning: a systematic literature review. A blueprint for large language model-augmented telehealth for HIV mitigation in Indonesia: A scoping review of a novel therapeutic modality. Advancing African American and hispanic health literacy with a bilingual, personalized, prevention smartphone application. Evaluating the quality of Spanish-language information for patients with type 2 diabetes on YouTube and Facebook. Pathways to usage intention of mobile health apps among hypertensive patients: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1