非裔美国人和美国白人吸烟者对肺癌筛查的医学不信任和接受程度。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Psychology Health & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889
Olivia Aspiras, Hollis Hutchings, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Ikenna C Okereke, Todd Lucas
{"title":"非裔美国人和美国白人吸烟者对肺癌筛查的医学不信任和接受程度。","authors":"Olivia Aspiras, Hollis Hutchings, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Ikenna C Okereke, Todd Lucas","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although medical mistrust is associated with lower cancer screening uptake among racial minorities, such as African Americans, potential impacts on cancer screening among White Americans are generally understudied. In this study, we examined links from medical mistrust to lung cancer screening among African American (<i>N</i> = 203) and White American (<i>N</i> = 201) smokers. Participants completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale and viewed a brief online educational module about lung cancer risks, etiology, and screening. Thereafter, participants reported their receptivity to lung cancer screening using a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measurement framework (attitudes, normative beliefs, perceived control, and intentions). Medical mistrust predicted lower screening receptivity across all TPB measures for both racial groups. Although medical mistrust was higher among African Americans, there were no race differences in screening receptivity. However, there was some evidence that race moderates the relationship between medical mistrust and screening attitudes. While greater mistrust predicted more negative attitudes among both races, this effect was stronger among White Americans than African Americans. Findings suggest that group-based medical mistrust is a barrier to lung cancer screening for both African Americans and White Americans and illustrates the need to address medical mistrust as a barrier to screening for both racial minority and nonminority populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical mistrust and receptivity to lung cancer screening among African American and white American smokers.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Aspiras, Hollis Hutchings, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Ikenna C Okereke, Todd Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although medical mistrust is associated with lower cancer screening uptake among racial minorities, such as African Americans, potential impacts on cancer screening among White Americans are generally understudied. In this study, we examined links from medical mistrust to lung cancer screening among African American (<i>N</i> = 203) and White American (<i>N</i> = 201) smokers. Participants completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale and viewed a brief online educational module about lung cancer risks, etiology, and screening. Thereafter, participants reported their receptivity to lung cancer screening using a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measurement framework (attitudes, normative beliefs, perceived control, and intentions). Medical mistrust predicted lower screening receptivity across all TPB measures for both racial groups. Although medical mistrust was higher among African Americans, there were no race differences in screening receptivity. However, there was some evidence that race moderates the relationship between medical mistrust and screening attitudes. While greater mistrust predicted more negative attitudes among both races, this effect was stronger among White Americans than African Americans. Findings suggest that group-based medical mistrust is a barrier to lung cancer screening for both African Americans and White Americans and illustrates the need to address medical mistrust as a barrier to screening for both racial minority and nonminority populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然医疗不信任与少数族裔(如非裔美国人)的癌症筛查率较低有关,但对美国白人癌症筛查的潜在影响通常尚未得到充分研究。在这项研究中,我们研究了非裔美国人(N = 203)和白人美国人(N = 201)吸烟者之间从医疗不信任到肺癌筛查的联系。参与者完成了基于小组的医疗不信任量表,并观看了关于肺癌风险、病因和筛查的简短在线教育模块。之后,参与者使用计划行为理论(TPB)测量框架(态度、规范信念、感知控制和意图)报告他们对肺癌筛查的接受程度。医学上的不信任预示着两种种族对所有TPB措施的接受度较低。尽管非裔美国人对医疗的不信任程度更高,但在接受筛查方面没有种族差异。然而,有一些证据表明,种族缓和了医疗不信任和筛查态度之间的关系。虽然更大的不信任预示着两个种族之间更消极的态度,但这种影响在白人美国人中比在非洲裔美国人中更强烈。研究结果表明,基于群体的医疗不信任是非洲裔美国人和白人美国人肺癌筛查的障碍,并说明需要解决医疗不信任作为少数族裔和非少数族裔人群筛查的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical mistrust and receptivity to lung cancer screening among African American and white American smokers.

Although medical mistrust is associated with lower cancer screening uptake among racial minorities, such as African Americans, potential impacts on cancer screening among White Americans are generally understudied. In this study, we examined links from medical mistrust to lung cancer screening among African American (N = 203) and White American (N = 201) smokers. Participants completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale and viewed a brief online educational module about lung cancer risks, etiology, and screening. Thereafter, participants reported their receptivity to lung cancer screening using a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measurement framework (attitudes, normative beliefs, perceived control, and intentions). Medical mistrust predicted lower screening receptivity across all TPB measures for both racial groups. Although medical mistrust was higher among African Americans, there were no race differences in screening receptivity. However, there was some evidence that race moderates the relationship between medical mistrust and screening attitudes. While greater mistrust predicted more negative attitudes among both races, this effect was stronger among White Americans than African Americans. Findings suggest that group-based medical mistrust is a barrier to lung cancer screening for both African Americans and White Americans and illustrates the need to address medical mistrust as a barrier to screening for both racial minority and nonminority populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
期刊最新文献
Sleep actigraphy results and HIV health outcomes in an urban HIV clinic sample. Facets of mindfulness are associated with inflammation biomarkers in a sample of sexual minority men with HIV. Active surveillance for prostate cancer is a shared journey: the dyadic perspective. Impact of mental disorders on low adherence to antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV in Spain. The association between caregiver burden, social capital, and family functioning among caregivers of older adults with PSD - A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1