开窗主动脉腔内修复肾旁动脉瘤的远期疗效。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.001
Alexandre Rossillon, Nicolas Massad, Robin Sagnet, Raphael Soler, Marine Gaudry, Pierre-Edouard Magnan, Michel-Alain Bartoli
{"title":"开窗主动脉腔内修复肾旁动脉瘤的远期疗效。","authors":"Alexandre Rossillon,&nbsp;Nicolas Massad,&nbsp;Robin Sagnet,&nbsp;Raphael Soler,&nbsp;Marine Gaudry,&nbsp;Pierre-Edouard Magnan,&nbsp;Michel-Alain Bartoli","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fenestrated endografts have been a safe and effective solution in our institution for patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) that were not candidates for conventional repair and had suitable anatomy. The objective of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between September 2005 and December 2021, this study included all the patients bearing juxtarenal aneurysm electively treated with a fenestrated endograft. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected monocentric data. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were processed. Postoperative follow-up included at least a systematic computed tomography scan at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months then every year. Secondary procedure was defined as any additional procedure performed to treat aneurysm or endograft-related complications after index procedure. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed descriptively. Overall survival and freedom from secondary procedures were determined using the Kaplan–Meier estimate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 169 patients (92% male) were treated by fenestrated endograft with a mean 55 ± 37 months follow-up. The median aneurysm diameter was 59 mm. In 39 patients (23.1%), we performed a secondary procedure, by endovascular means in 57% of cases, mostly after the first year of follow-up (53.8%). The most frequent cause for secondary procedure was type 1b endoleak due to the evolution of aneurysmal disease of the iliac arteries (25.6%), followed by endograft limb thrombosis (20.5%), local complications related to index procedure (17.9%) and procedures performed to insure target vessel patency over time (18%). On the last CT scan of the follow-up, patients without secondary procedure were significantly more likely to present a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac (<em>P</em> = 0.001), defined as a modification of the maximum diameter &gt; 5 mm. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients that had secondary procedures compared to those that had not (80 months vs. 62 months, <em>P</em> = 0.3). Freedom from secondary procedures was 87% at 24 months and 63% at 60 months. Excluding secondary procedures within 30 days, freedom from secondary procedures was 76% at 50 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fenestrated endografts constitute a sustainable therapeutic solution in the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs. The occurrence of late complications justifies a rigorous follow-up of treated patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Fenestrated Aortic Endovascular Repair in Patients Bearing JuxtaRenal Aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Rossillon,&nbsp;Nicolas Massad,&nbsp;Robin Sagnet,&nbsp;Raphael Soler,&nbsp;Marine Gaudry,&nbsp;Pierre-Edouard Magnan,&nbsp;Michel-Alain Bartoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fenestrated endografts have been a safe and effective solution in our institution for patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) that were not candidates for conventional repair and had suitable anatomy. The objective of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between September 2005 and December 2021, this study included all the patients bearing juxtarenal aneurysm electively treated with a fenestrated endograft. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected monocentric data. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were processed. Postoperative follow-up included at least a systematic computed tomography scan at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months then every year. Secondary procedure was defined as any additional procedure performed to treat aneurysm or endograft-related complications after index procedure. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed descriptively. Overall survival and freedom from secondary procedures were determined using the Kaplan–Meier estimate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 169 patients (92% male) were treated by fenestrated endograft with a mean 55 ± 37 months follow-up. The median aneurysm diameter was 59 mm. In 39 patients (23.1%), we performed a secondary procedure, by endovascular means in 57% of cases, mostly after the first year of follow-up (53.8%). The most frequent cause for secondary procedure was type 1b endoleak due to the evolution of aneurysmal disease of the iliac arteries (25.6%), followed by endograft limb thrombosis (20.5%), local complications related to index procedure (17.9%) and procedures performed to insure target vessel patency over time (18%). On the last CT scan of the follow-up, patients without secondary procedure were significantly more likely to present a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac (<em>P</em> = 0.001), defined as a modification of the maximum diameter &gt; 5 mm. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients that had secondary procedures compared to those that had not (80 months vs. 62 months, <em>P</em> = 0.3). Freedom from secondary procedures was 87% at 24 months and 63% at 60 months. Excluding secondary procedures within 30 days, freedom from secondary procedures was 76% at 50 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fenestrated endografts constitute a sustainable therapeutic solution in the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs. The occurrence of late complications justifies a rigorous follow-up of treated patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 250-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:开窗内移植术(FEVAR)是我院治疗肾旁腹主动脉瘤的一种安全有效的方法。我们研究的目的是评估这些干预措施的长期结果。方法:在2005年9月至2021年12月期间,本研究纳入了所有接受开窗内移植物选择性治疗的肾旁动脉瘤患者。我们对前瞻性收集的单中心数据进行了回顾性分析。对术前、围手术期和术后数据进行处理。术后随访包括每年至少在6、12、18和24个月进行一次系统的计算机断层扫描。二次手术被定义为在首次手术后为治疗动脉瘤或内植相关并发症而进行的任何额外手术。对人口学和围手术期资料进行描述性分析。使用Kaplan-Meier估计确定总生存率和免于二次手术。结果:169例患者(92%为男性)接受开窗内移植术治疗,平均随访55±37个月。中位动脉瘤直径59 mm。在39例患者(23.1%)中,我们在57%的病例中通过血管内方式进行了二次手术,主要是在随访一年后(53.8%)。继发手术最常见的原因是由于髂动脉动脉瘤疾病的演变而导致的1b型内漏(25.6%),其次是移植物肢体血栓形成(20.5%),与指数手术相关的局部并发症(17.9%)和确保靶血管长期通畅的手术(18%)。在随访的最后一次CT扫描中,未进行二次手术的患者明显更有可能出现动脉瘤囊缩小(p= 0.001),定义为最大直径改变0.5 mm。接受二次手术的患者与未接受二次手术的患者的总生存期无显著差异(80个月vs 62个月,p=0.3)。24个月和60个月时的二次手术成功率分别为87%和63%。排除30天内的二次手术,50个月时二次手术的自由度为76%。结论:开窗内移植是治疗肾旁腹主动脉瘤的一种可持续的治疗方案。晚期并发症的发生证明了对治疗患者的严格随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Outcomes of Fenestrated Aortic Endovascular Repair in Patients Bearing JuxtaRenal Aneurysms

Background

Fenestrated endografts have been a safe and effective solution in our institution for patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) that were not candidates for conventional repair and had suitable anatomy. The objective of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these interventions.

Methods

Between September 2005 and December 2021, this study included all the patients bearing juxtarenal aneurysm electively treated with a fenestrated endograft. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected monocentric data. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were processed. Postoperative follow-up included at least a systematic computed tomography scan at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months then every year. Secondary procedure was defined as any additional procedure performed to treat aneurysm or endograft-related complications after index procedure. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed descriptively. Overall survival and freedom from secondary procedures were determined using the Kaplan–Meier estimate.

Results

A total of 169 patients (92% male) were treated by fenestrated endograft with a mean 55 ± 37 months follow-up. The median aneurysm diameter was 59 mm. In 39 patients (23.1%), we performed a secondary procedure, by endovascular means in 57% of cases, mostly after the first year of follow-up (53.8%). The most frequent cause for secondary procedure was type 1b endoleak due to the evolution of aneurysmal disease of the iliac arteries (25.6%), followed by endograft limb thrombosis (20.5%), local complications related to index procedure (17.9%) and procedures performed to insure target vessel patency over time (18%). On the last CT scan of the follow-up, patients without secondary procedure were significantly more likely to present a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac (P = 0.001), defined as a modification of the maximum diameter > 5 mm. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients that had secondary procedures compared to those that had not (80 months vs. 62 months, P = 0.3). Freedom from secondary procedures was 87% at 24 months and 63% at 60 months. Excluding secondary procedures within 30 days, freedom from secondary procedures was 76% at 50 months.

Conclusions

Fenestrated endografts constitute a sustainable therapeutic solution in the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs. The occurrence of late complications justifies a rigorous follow-up of treated patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Hostile Artery Access: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study Open Revascularization for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia is Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality when Compared to Endovascular Intervention Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Celiac Artery Atresia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1