探索双侧乳房大小和密度不对称:来自沙特筛查人群的见解

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101848
Ibrahem Hussain Kanbayti , Rawan Sameer Nasruddin , Dana Ahmed Sumait , Afnan Dakheel Allah Alnemari , Ibrahim Hadadi , Yousef Almaimoni , Ernest U. Ekpo
{"title":"探索双侧乳房大小和密度不对称:来自沙特筛查人群的见解","authors":"Ibrahem Hussain Kanbayti ,&nbsp;Rawan Sameer Nasruddin ,&nbsp;Dana Ahmed Sumait ,&nbsp;Afnan Dakheel Allah Alnemari ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Hadadi ,&nbsp;Yousef Almaimoni ,&nbsp;Ernest U. Ekpo","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>The swift appearance of asymmetry in breast size and density has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and other pathological changes. However, the occurrence of breast asymmetry and the factors influencing it have not been extensively studied among healthy, screened women in the Saudi population. Thus, this study aims to explore bilateral breast asymmetry in breast size and density among healthy, screened Saudi women and factors affecting the asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data of 1048 out of 1173 eligible women screened between 2012 and 2018 were extracted from Sheikh Mohammed Hussien AL-Amoudi Center of Excellence in Breast Cancer. The Laboratory for Individualized Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software was used to measure percent density, dense area, and total area of breast from mammograms. Paired <em>t</em>-test was used to examine asymmetry between right and left breasts, and stratified analysis was performed to investigate the factors associated with breast asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed between the right and left breasts in percent density, dense area, and total breast area (p ≥ 0.2). However, for participants who never breastfed, the right breast area was slightly larger (average: 207.9 cm<sup>2</sup>) than the left breast (average: 202.8 cm<sup>2</sup>); p = 0.008.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There were no significant differences found in the density, and size of the right and left breasts. However, women who breastfed tended to have slightly larger right breasts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring bilateral breast size and density asymmetry: Insights from the saudi screening population\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahem Hussain Kanbayti ,&nbsp;Rawan Sameer Nasruddin ,&nbsp;Dana Ahmed Sumait ,&nbsp;Afnan Dakheel Allah Alnemari ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Hadadi ,&nbsp;Yousef Almaimoni ,&nbsp;Ernest U. Ekpo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>The swift appearance of asymmetry in breast size and density has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and other pathological changes. However, the occurrence of breast asymmetry and the factors influencing it have not been extensively studied among healthy, screened women in the Saudi population. Thus, this study aims to explore bilateral breast asymmetry in breast size and density among healthy, screened Saudi women and factors affecting the asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data of 1048 out of 1173 eligible women screened between 2012 and 2018 were extracted from Sheikh Mohammed Hussien AL-Amoudi Center of Excellence in Breast Cancer. The Laboratory for Individualized Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software was used to measure percent density, dense area, and total area of breast from mammograms. Paired <em>t</em>-test was used to examine asymmetry between right and left breasts, and stratified analysis was performed to investigate the factors associated with breast asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed between the right and left breasts in percent density, dense area, and total breast area (p ≥ 0.2). However, for participants who never breastfed, the right breast area was slightly larger (average: 207.9 cm<sup>2</sup>) than the left breast (average: 202.8 cm<sup>2</sup>); p = 0.008.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There were no significant differences found in the density, and size of the right and left breasts. However, women who breastfed tended to have slightly larger right breasts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424003452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424003452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的乳房大小和密度的不对称的迅速出现与乳腺癌和其他病理变化的风险增加有关。然而,在沙特人口中接受筛查的健康妇女中,乳房不对称的发生及其影响因素尚未得到广泛研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨健康、筛查的沙特女性双侧乳房在乳房大小和密度上的不对称,以及影响不对称的因素。方法从Sheikh Mohammed Hussien AL-Amoudi乳腺癌卓越中心提取2012年至2018年期间筛查的1173名符合条件的女性中的1048名的数据。使用个体化放射密度评估实验室(LIBRA)软件测量乳房x光片的百分比密度、致密面积和乳房总面积。采用配对t检验左右乳房不对称,分层分析乳房不对称的相关因素。结果左、右乳房密度百分比、致密面积、总乳房面积差异无统计学意义(p≥0.2)。然而,对于从未母乳喂养的参与者,右乳房面积(平均:207.9平方厘米)略大于左乳房(平均:202.8平方厘米);p = 0.008。结论左、右乳房密度、大小差异无统计学意义。然而,母乳喂养的女性往往右乳略大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring bilateral breast size and density asymmetry: Insights from the saudi screening population

Background/objectives

The swift appearance of asymmetry in breast size and density has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and other pathological changes. However, the occurrence of breast asymmetry and the factors influencing it have not been extensively studied among healthy, screened women in the Saudi population. Thus, this study aims to explore bilateral breast asymmetry in breast size and density among healthy, screened Saudi women and factors affecting the asymmetry.

Methods

Data of 1048 out of 1173 eligible women screened between 2012 and 2018 were extracted from Sheikh Mohammed Hussien AL-Amoudi Center of Excellence in Breast Cancer. The Laboratory for Individualized Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software was used to measure percent density, dense area, and total area of breast from mammograms. Paired t-test was used to examine asymmetry between right and left breasts, and stratified analysis was performed to investigate the factors associated with breast asymmetry.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the right and left breasts in percent density, dense area, and total breast area (p ≥ 0.2). However, for participants who never breastfed, the right breast area was slightly larger (average: 207.9 cm2) than the left breast (average: 202.8 cm2); p = 0.008.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences found in the density, and size of the right and left breasts. However, women who breastfed tended to have slightly larger right breasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Celiac disease and COVID-19: Leveraging health registries for crucial insights and public health strategies Geospatial insights into chronic bronchitis: Evaluating hotspots and environmental factors in MUDHRA-cohort of Mysuru district, India Harnessing ensemble deep learning models for precise detection of gynaecological cancers Prevalence and mortality of infective endocarditis in Kazakhstan: A nationwide epidemiological study (2018–2022) Assessment of 2021 surveillance system for under-five children with pneumonia in Bantul Regency, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1