护理共同决策态度量表的翻译与心理测量学评价研究

Stefanie van den Broek , Floor Halvorsen , Bregje Raap- van Sleuwen , Rien de Vos
{"title":"护理共同决策态度量表的翻译与心理测量学评价研究","authors":"Stefanie van den Broek ,&nbsp;Floor Halvorsen ,&nbsp;Bregje Raap- van Sleuwen ,&nbsp;Rien de Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurses have an increasingly important role in the ‘shared decision-making’ process. Knowledge about attitudes can facilitate the implementation process of the different roles of nurses in shared decision-making. However, no specific instrument is available in Dutch to assess Dutch nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to translate the Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale into Dutch and evaluate its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Psychometric evaluation study.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>A general hospital in the Netherlands.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A random sample of 128 nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The translation was performed using translation and cross-cultural guidelines. Experts assessed content validity. In a cross-sectional study, 128 nurses completed the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The factor structure of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was determined by principal components analysis. Internal consistency and standard error of measurement (SEM) were assessed. A first and simple hypothesis for construct validity was tested.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Experts rated content validity as adequate. The principal components analysis revealed a 2-factor structure as most suitable (Empathic communication and Mastery learning) consistent with the original Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The explained variance was 55 %. The internal consistency was 0.84 and 0.78 for the subscales and the SEM was 1,65. The mean score on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was 46,4 (CI: 42.77–49.23). A first and simple hypothesis that more experience in shared decision-making would lead to higher shared decision-making scores on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale, could not be confirmed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and innovation</h3><div>This study fills in a gap concerning available instruments to assess attitudes towards SDM among nurses since there is no instrument available for the Dutch population.</div><div>The results of this study are a first and somewhat promising step towards further developing the reliability and validity of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale as a measure of hospital nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making. Such measurement information is relevant to researchers and nurses involved in the implementation of shared decision-making in nursing practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nursing shared decision making attitude scale: A translation and psychometric evaluation study\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie van den Broek ,&nbsp;Floor Halvorsen ,&nbsp;Bregje Raap- van Sleuwen ,&nbsp;Rien de Vos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurses have an increasingly important role in the ‘shared decision-making’ process. Knowledge about attitudes can facilitate the implementation process of the different roles of nurses in shared decision-making. However, no specific instrument is available in Dutch to assess Dutch nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to translate the Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale into Dutch and evaluate its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Psychometric evaluation study.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>A general hospital in the Netherlands.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A random sample of 128 nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The translation was performed using translation and cross-cultural guidelines. Experts assessed content validity. In a cross-sectional study, 128 nurses completed the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The factor structure of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was determined by principal components analysis. Internal consistency and standard error of measurement (SEM) were assessed. A first and simple hypothesis for construct validity was tested.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Experts rated content validity as adequate. The principal components analysis revealed a 2-factor structure as most suitable (Empathic communication and Mastery learning) consistent with the original Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The explained variance was 55 %. The internal consistency was 0.84 and 0.78 for the subscales and the SEM was 1,65. The mean score on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was 46,4 (CI: 42.77–49.23). A first and simple hypothesis that more experience in shared decision-making would lead to higher shared decision-making scores on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale, could not be confirmed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and innovation</h3><div>This study fills in a gap concerning available instruments to assess attitudes towards SDM among nurses since there is no instrument available for the Dutch population.</div><div>The results of this study are a first and somewhat promising step towards further developing the reliability and validity of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale as a measure of hospital nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making. Such measurement information is relevant to researchers and nurses involved in the implementation of shared decision-making in nursing practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护士在“共同决策”过程中发挥着越来越重要的作用。关于态度的知识可以促进护士在共同决策中的不同角色的实施过程。然而,荷兰没有具体的工具来评估荷兰护士对共同决策的态度。目的将护理共同决策态度量表翻译成荷兰语,并评价其心理测量学性质。设计心理测量评价研究。荷兰的一家综合医院。随机抽样128名护士。方法采用翻译和跨文化指导原则进行翻译。专家评估了内容效度。在一项横断面研究中,128名护士完成了荷兰护理共同决策态度量表。采用主成分分析法确定荷兰护理共同决策态度量表的因素结构。评估了内部一致性和测量标准误差(SEM)。首先对一个简单的构念效度假设进行了检验。结果专家认为内容效度足够。主成分分析显示,共情沟通和掌握学习是最合适的2因素结构,与原护理共同决策态度量表一致。解释方差为55%。各分量表的内部一致性分别为0.84和0.78,扫描电镜(SEM)为1.65。荷兰护理共同决策态度量表的平均得分为46,4分(CI: 42.77 ~ 49.23)。第一个简单的假设是,在荷兰护理共同决策态度量表上,更多的共同决策经验会导致更高的共同决策得分,这一假设无法得到证实。结论与创新本研究填补了关于可用工具来评估护士对SDM的态度的空白,因为荷兰人口中没有可用的工具。本研究的结果是第一步,有点希望进一步发展荷兰护理共同决策态度量表的可靠性和有效性,作为医院护士对共同决策态度的衡量标准。这些测量信息与研究人员和护士在护理实践中参与共同决策的实施有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The nursing shared decision making attitude scale: A translation and psychometric evaluation study

Background

Nurses have an increasingly important role in the ‘shared decision-making’ process. Knowledge about attitudes can facilitate the implementation process of the different roles of nurses in shared decision-making. However, no specific instrument is available in Dutch to assess Dutch nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making.

Aim

This study aims to translate the Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale into Dutch and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Design

Psychometric evaluation study.

Settings

A general hospital in the Netherlands.

Participants

A random sample of 128 nurses.

Methods

The translation was performed using translation and cross-cultural guidelines. Experts assessed content validity. In a cross-sectional study, 128 nurses completed the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The factor structure of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was determined by principal components analysis. Internal consistency and standard error of measurement (SEM) were assessed. A first and simple hypothesis for construct validity was tested.

Results

Experts rated content validity as adequate. The principal components analysis revealed a 2-factor structure as most suitable (Empathic communication and Mastery learning) consistent with the original Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The explained variance was 55 %. The internal consistency was 0.84 and 0.78 for the subscales and the SEM was 1,65. The mean score on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was 46,4 (CI: 42.77–49.23). A first and simple hypothesis that more experience in shared decision-making would lead to higher shared decision-making scores on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale, could not be confirmed.

Conclusion and innovation

This study fills in a gap concerning available instruments to assess attitudes towards SDM among nurses since there is no instrument available for the Dutch population.
The results of this study are a first and somewhat promising step towards further developing the reliability and validity of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale as a measure of hospital nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making. Such measurement information is relevant to researchers and nurses involved in the implementation of shared decision-making in nursing practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers Enhancing perinatal health patient information through ChatGPT – An accuracy study Changes in community pharmacy communication – Towards emotional awareness at the pharmacy counter Corrigendum to “Factors contributing to implementation of a father-friendly neonatal intensive care unit in Denmark” [PEC Innovation 5 (2024) 100353] “It's hard to talk to a computer, I get it”: An exploratory analysis of clinician connection-building communication practices in rural telepalliative care encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1