了解科罗拉多河流域水流特征的时间变异性和可预测性

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386
Patricia Puente , Balaji Rajagopalan , Laura E. Condon
{"title":"了解科罗拉多河流域水流特征的时间变异性和可预测性","authors":"Patricia Puente ,&nbsp;Balaji Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Laura E. Condon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span>-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 132386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Puente ,&nbsp;Balaji Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Laura E. Condon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span>-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"648 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017827\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经确定的是,在年代际时间尺度(即低频率)上,水流状态的演变导致了分布的长期变化。类似的低频变化也被记录在水流的可预测性中。在这里,我们探讨了科罗拉多河上游流域的流量分布属性和可预测性制度之间的联系。采用非线性动态时间序列分析方法,对流域6个地点762—2019年的径流时间序列进行了分析。首先,进行小波谱分析以获得流场的准周期“信号”。小波分析还提供了信号时间序列方差的时间变异性。将信号时间序列嵌入到具有适当滞后的d维空间中,以重建动力学的相空间-即吸引子。总体可预测性通过使用全局Lyapunov指数量化相空间中的平均发散轨迹和通过局部Lyapunov指数量化可预测性的时间变异性来评估。结果表明,在整个研究期间,在所有量具上,流量可预测性都出现了明显的波动,可预测性既有高周期,也有低周期。通过比较流量表的可预测性时间序列,我们发现在高可预测性和低可预测性时期总体上是一致的,尽管它们在时间上并不完全一致。一般来说,较高(较低)可预测期的特征是较低(较高)的流量方差。虽然一般来说,流量大小和可预测性之间没有明确的关系,但现代高可预测性时期的特点是,与其他时期相比,干年的可能性略大,湿年的可能性较低。这些发现表明,在高可预测性和低可预测性期间,水流特征在统计上可能存在显著差异。进一步探讨这些资金与大规模气候的潜在联系,有助于利用它们进行熟练的短期和中期流量预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin
It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a D-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Evolution patterns, driving mechanisms, and ecological indicative effects of 730 lakes water color in the Yangtze River Basin (1984–2023) Hydrological connectivity and biogeochemical dynamics in the function and management of the lower Oder floodplain Urban real-time rainfall-runoff prediction using adaptive SSA-decomposition with dual attention Geochemical behavior of high-level radium contamination in representative coastal saltworks LSTM-FKAN coupled with feature extraction technique for Precipitation–Runoff modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1