Jyrki K. Virtanen, Sari Hantunen, Niko Kallio, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, JoAnn E. Manson, Tarja Nurmi, Jussi Pihlajamäki, Matti Uusitupa, Ari Voutilainen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen
{"title":"维生素D3补充剂对非糖尿病高风险健康老年人2型糖尿病发病率的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Jyrki K. Virtanen, Sari Hantunen, Niko Kallio, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, JoAnn E. Manson, Tarja Nurmi, Jussi Pihlajamäki, Matti Uusitupa, Ari Voutilainen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06336-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, but evidence from randomised trials on the benefits of vitamin D supplementation is limited, especially for average-risk populations. The Finnish Vitamin D Trial (FIND) investigated the effects of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplementation at two different doses on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a generally healthy older adult population.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>FIND was a 5 year randomised placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial among 2271 male and female participants aged ≥60 years and ≥65 years, respectively, from a general Finnish population who were free of CVD or cancer and did not use diabetes medications. The study had three arms: placebo, 1600 IU/day of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> or 3200 IU/day of vitamin D<sub>3</sub>. A non-study group statistician carried out sex-stratified simple randomisation in a 1:1:1 ratio, based on computerised random number generation. The participants, investigators and study staff were masked to group assignment. National health registries were used to collect event data. A representative subcohort of 505 participants had more detailed in-person investigations at months 0, 6, 12 and 24.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>During the mean follow-up of 4.2 years, there were 38 (5.0%), 31 (4.2%) and 36 (4.7%) type 2 diabetes events in the placebo (<i>n</i>=760), 1600 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i>=744; vs placebo: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.50, 1.30) and 3200 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i>=767; vs placebo: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58, 1.45) arms, respectively (<i>p</i>-trend=0.73). When the two vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms were combined and compared with the placebo arm, the HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.58, 1.29). In the analyses stratified by BMI (<25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=813, number of type 2 diabetes events=12], 25–30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=1032, number of events=38], ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=422, number of events=54]), the HRs in the combined vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms vs the placebo were 0.43 (95% CI 0.14, 1.34), 0.97 (0.50, 1.91) and 1.00 (0.57, 1.75), respectively (<i>p</i>-interaction <0.001). In the subcohort, the mean (SD) baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D<sub>3</sub> (25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>) concentration was 74.5 (18.1) nmol/l. After 12 months, the concentrations were 72.6 (17.7), 99.3 (20.8) and 120.9 (22.1) nmol/l in the placebo, 1600 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> and 3200 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms, respectively. In the subcohort, no differences were observed in changes in plasma glucose or insulin concentrations, BMI or waist circumference during the 24 month follow-up (<i>p</i> values ≥0.19).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion/interpretation</h3><p>Among generally healthy older adults who are not at high risk for diabetes and who have serum 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> levels that are sufficient for bone health, vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplementation did not significantly reduce the risk of developing diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01463813.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in healthy older adults not at high risk for diabetes (FIND): a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jyrki K. Virtanen, Sari Hantunen, Niko Kallio, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, JoAnn E. Manson, Tarja Nurmi, Jussi Pihlajamäki, Matti Uusitupa, Ari Voutilainen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00125-024-06336-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, but evidence from randomised trials on the benefits of vitamin D supplementation is limited, especially for average-risk populations. The Finnish Vitamin D Trial (FIND) investigated the effects of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplementation at two different doses on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a generally healthy older adult population.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>FIND was a 5 year randomised placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial among 2271 male and female participants aged ≥60 years and ≥65 years, respectively, from a general Finnish population who were free of CVD or cancer and did not use diabetes medications. The study had three arms: placebo, 1600 IU/day of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> or 3200 IU/day of vitamin D<sub>3</sub>. A non-study group statistician carried out sex-stratified simple randomisation in a 1:1:1 ratio, based on computerised random number generation. The participants, investigators and study staff were masked to group assignment. National health registries were used to collect event data. A representative subcohort of 505 participants had more detailed in-person investigations at months 0, 6, 12 and 24.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>During the mean follow-up of 4.2 years, there were 38 (5.0%), 31 (4.2%) and 36 (4.7%) type 2 diabetes events in the placebo (<i>n</i>=760), 1600 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i>=744; vs placebo: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.50, 1.30) and 3200 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> (<i>n</i>=767; vs placebo: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58, 1.45) arms, respectively (<i>p</i>-trend=0.73). When the two vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms were combined and compared with the placebo arm, the HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.58, 1.29). In the analyses stratified by BMI (<25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=813, number of type 2 diabetes events=12], 25–30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=1032, number of events=38], ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [<i>n</i>=422, number of events=54]), the HRs in the combined vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms vs the placebo were 0.43 (95% CI 0.14, 1.34), 0.97 (0.50, 1.91) and 1.00 (0.57, 1.75), respectively (<i>p</i>-interaction <0.001). In the subcohort, the mean (SD) baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D<sub>3</sub> (25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>) concentration was 74.5 (18.1) nmol/l. After 12 months, the concentrations were 72.6 (17.7), 99.3 (20.8) and 120.9 (22.1) nmol/l in the placebo, 1600 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> and 3200 IU/day vitamin D<sub>3</sub> arms, respectively. In the subcohort, no differences were observed in changes in plasma glucose or insulin concentrations, BMI or waist circumference during the 24 month follow-up (<i>p</i> values ≥0.19).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion/interpretation</h3><p>Among generally healthy older adults who are not at high risk for diabetes and who have serum 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> levels that are sufficient for bone health, vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplementation did not significantly reduce the risk of developing diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01463813.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetologia\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06336-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06336-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/假设维生素D不足与2型糖尿病风险升高有关,但来自随机试验的证据表明补充维生素D的益处有限,特别是对于平均风险人群。芬兰维生素D试验(FIND)调查了两种不同剂量的维生素D3补充对一般健康老年人2型糖尿病发病率的影响。方法:find是一项为期5年的随机、安慰剂对照、平行组试验,研究对象分别为2271名年龄≥60岁和≥65岁的男性和女性,受试者均来自无心血管疾病或癌症且未使用糖尿病药物的芬兰普通人群。该研究分为三组:安慰剂组、每天1600国际单位维生素D3组和每天3200国际单位维生素D3组。非研究组统计学家根据计算机生成的随机数,按1:1:1的比例进行了性别分层的简单随机化。参与者、调查人员和研究人员按小组分配进行分组。使用国家卫生登记来收集事件数据。505名参与者的代表性亚队列在第0、6、12和24个月进行了更详细的亲自调查。结果在平均4.2年的随访中,安慰剂组(n=760)发生38例(5.0%)、31例(4.2%)和36例(4.7%)2型糖尿病事件,维生素D3组(n=744;与安慰剂相比:HR 0.81;95% CI 0.50, 1.30)和3200 IU/d维生素D3 (n=767;与安慰剂组相比:HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58, 1.45)组(p-trend=0.73)。当两个维生素D3组联合使用并与安慰剂组比较时,风险比为0.86 (95% CI 0.58, 1.29)。在按BMI (25 kg/m2 [n=813, 2型糖尿病事件数=12],25 - 30 kg/m2 [n=1032,事件数=38],≥30 kg/m2 [n=422,事件数=54])分层的分析中,联合维生素D3组与安慰剂组的HRs分别为0.43 (95% CI 0.14, 1.34), 0.97(0.50, 1.91)和1.00 (0.57,1.75)(p-交互作用<;0.001)。在亚队列中,平均(SD)基线血清25(OH)D3 (25(OH)D3)浓度为74.5 (18.1)nmol/l。12个月后,安慰剂组、1600 IU/天维生素D3组和3200 IU/天维生素D3组的浓度分别为72.6(17.7)、99.3(20.8)和120.9 (22.1)nmol/l。在亚队列中,在24个月的随访期间,血浆葡萄糖或胰岛素浓度、BMI或腰围的变化均无差异(p值≥0.19)。结论/解释在一般健康的老年人中,没有糖尿病的高风险,血清25(OH)D3水平足以维持骨骼健康,补充维生素D3并没有显著降低患糖尿病的风险。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov NCT01463813。图形抽象
The effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in healthy older adults not at high risk for diabetes (FIND): a randomised controlled trial
Aims/hypothesis
Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, but evidence from randomised trials on the benefits of vitamin D supplementation is limited, especially for average-risk populations. The Finnish Vitamin D Trial (FIND) investigated the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation at two different doses on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a generally healthy older adult population.
Methods
FIND was a 5 year randomised placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial among 2271 male and female participants aged ≥60 years and ≥65 years, respectively, from a general Finnish population who were free of CVD or cancer and did not use diabetes medications. The study had three arms: placebo, 1600 IU/day of vitamin D3 or 3200 IU/day of vitamin D3. A non-study group statistician carried out sex-stratified simple randomisation in a 1:1:1 ratio, based on computerised random number generation. The participants, investigators and study staff were masked to group assignment. National health registries were used to collect event data. A representative subcohort of 505 participants had more detailed in-person investigations at months 0, 6, 12 and 24.
Results
During the mean follow-up of 4.2 years, there were 38 (5.0%), 31 (4.2%) and 36 (4.7%) type 2 diabetes events in the placebo (n=760), 1600 IU/day vitamin D3 (n=744; vs placebo: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.50, 1.30) and 3200 IU/day vitamin D3 (n=767; vs placebo: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58, 1.45) arms, respectively (p-trend=0.73). When the two vitamin D3 arms were combined and compared with the placebo arm, the HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.58, 1.29). In the analyses stratified by BMI (<25 kg/m2 [n=813, number of type 2 diabetes events=12], 25–30 kg/m2 [n=1032, number of events=38], ≥30 kg/m2 [n=422, number of events=54]), the HRs in the combined vitamin D3 arms vs the placebo were 0.43 (95% CI 0.14, 1.34), 0.97 (0.50, 1.91) and 1.00 (0.57, 1.75), respectively (p-interaction <0.001). In the subcohort, the mean (SD) baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) concentration was 74.5 (18.1) nmol/l. After 12 months, the concentrations were 72.6 (17.7), 99.3 (20.8) and 120.9 (22.1) nmol/l in the placebo, 1600 IU/day vitamin D3 and 3200 IU/day vitamin D3 arms, respectively. In the subcohort, no differences were observed in changes in plasma glucose or insulin concentrations, BMI or waist circumference during the 24 month follow-up (p values ≥0.19).
Conclusion/interpretation
Among generally healthy older adults who are not at high risk for diabetes and who have serum 25(OH)D3 levels that are sufficient for bone health, vitamin D3 supplementation did not significantly reduce the risk of developing diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.