提高院前创伤性脑损伤护理:民用和军用航空运输指南的比较分析

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2024.10.002
Sarthak Parikh DO , Christopher G. Hendrix MD , Jeremy Norman BAS, FP-C, NRP , Andrew K. Kurklinsky MD
{"title":"提高院前创伤性脑损伤护理:民用和军用航空运输指南的比较分析","authors":"Sarthak Parikh DO ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Hendrix MD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Norman BAS, FP-C, NRP ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Kurklinsky MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Establishing TBI guidelines is crucial for prehospital management. Civilian medical practices are often influenced by military trauma guidelines. This study provides a comparative analysis of prehospital TBI management by a civilian air medical evacuation service using civilian guidelines and military clinical practice guidelines from the Joint Trauma System of the Department of Defense.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of 100 deidentified patient transport logs from a prominent civilian air medical service was conducted. The logs were compared with the service's patient care guidelines and the 2023 Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines. Data were analyzed for adherence to 14 metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients showed improvement in preflight and postflight Glasgow Coma Scale scores and were managed according to recommendations on head elevation, oxygenation, blood pressure, and temperature by both organizations. Discrepancies between guidelines included differences in the management of ventilator settings, blood pressure, oxygenation, temperature, serum glucose, intracranial hypertension, suspected brain herniation, serum sodium levels, and seizure prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Comparing civilian and military guidelines highlights areas for potential improvements in TBI management, such as integrating advanced monitoring and the implementation of (i-STAT, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) testing in air transport to enhance patient care and outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 6","pages":"Pages 548-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevating Prehospital Traumatic Brain Injury Care: A Comparative Analysis of Civilian and Military Air Transport Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Sarthak Parikh DO ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Hendrix MD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Norman BAS, FP-C, NRP ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Kurklinsky MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Establishing TBI guidelines is crucial for prehospital management. Civilian medical practices are often influenced by military trauma guidelines. This study provides a comparative analysis of prehospital TBI management by a civilian air medical evacuation service using civilian guidelines and military clinical practice guidelines from the Joint Trauma System of the Department of Defense.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of 100 deidentified patient transport logs from a prominent civilian air medical service was conducted. The logs were compared with the service's patient care guidelines and the 2023 Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines. Data were analyzed for adherence to 14 metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients showed improvement in preflight and postflight Glasgow Coma Scale scores and were managed according to recommendations on head elevation, oxygenation, blood pressure, and temperature by both organizations. Discrepancies between guidelines included differences in the management of ventilator settings, blood pressure, oxygenation, temperature, serum glucose, intracranial hypertension, suspected brain herniation, serum sodium levels, and seizure prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Comparing civilian and military guidelines highlights areas for potential improvements in TBI management, such as integrating advanced monitoring and the implementation of (i-STAT, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) testing in air transport to enhance patient care and outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 548-552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24002153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24002153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的外伤性脑损伤(tbi)是世界范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因之一。建立创伤性脑损伤指南对院前管理至关重要。平民医疗实践经常受到军事创伤准则的影响。本研究采用国防部联合创伤系统的民用指南和军事临床实践指南,对民用航空医疗后送服务的院前TBI管理进行了比较分析。方法回顾性分析某著名民用航空医疗服务机构100例未确定身份的病人运输日志。这些日志与该服务的患者护理指南和2023年关节创伤系统临床实践指南进行了比较。对14个指标的依从性进行数据分析。结果患者在飞行前和飞行后的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分均有改善,并根据两个组织对头部抬高、氧合、血压和体温的建议进行管理。指南之间的差异包括呼吸机设置、血压、氧合、体温、血清葡萄糖、颅内高压、疑似脑疝、血清钠水平和癫痫预防的管理差异。结论:比较民用和军用指南突出了TBI管理的潜在改进领域,例如在航空运输中整合先进的监测和实施(i-STAT, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL)测试,以提高患者护理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elevating Prehospital Traumatic Brain Injury Care: A Comparative Analysis of Civilian and Military Air Transport Guidelines

Objective

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Establishing TBI guidelines is crucial for prehospital management. Civilian medical practices are often influenced by military trauma guidelines. This study provides a comparative analysis of prehospital TBI management by a civilian air medical evacuation service using civilian guidelines and military clinical practice guidelines from the Joint Trauma System of the Department of Defense.

Methods

A retrospective review of 100 deidentified patient transport logs from a prominent civilian air medical service was conducted. The logs were compared with the service's patient care guidelines and the 2023 Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines. Data were analyzed for adherence to 14 metrics.

Results

Patients showed improvement in preflight and postflight Glasgow Coma Scale scores and were managed according to recommendations on head elevation, oxygenation, blood pressure, and temperature by both organizations. Discrepancies between guidelines included differences in the management of ventilator settings, blood pressure, oxygenation, temperature, serum glucose, intracranial hypertension, suspected brain herniation, serum sodium levels, and seizure prophylaxis.

Conclusion

Comparing civilian and military guidelines highlights areas for potential improvements in TBI management, such as integrating advanced monitoring and the implementation of (i-STAT, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) testing in air transport to enhance patient care and outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Italian Search and Rescue Seaplanes From the 50s to the 70s: A Brave People and Mighty Aircraft Story November/December 2024 Forum Reducing Deep Sedation and Benzodiazepine Use in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Critical Care Transport: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1