COVID-19门诊症状患者的初级血栓预防:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102613
Davide Di Vece , Marco Valgimigli , Elliot Barnathan , Jean M. Connors , Frank Cools , Ulrike Held , Ajay K. Kakkar , Gregory Piazza , David Spirk , Saverio Virdone , Nils Kucher , Stefano Barco
{"title":"COVID-19门诊症状患者的初级血栓预防:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Davide Di Vece ,&nbsp;Marco Valgimigli ,&nbsp;Elliot Barnathan ,&nbsp;Jean M. Connors ,&nbsp;Frank Cools ,&nbsp;Ulrike Held ,&nbsp;Ajay K. Kakkar ,&nbsp;Gregory Piazza ,&nbsp;David Spirk ,&nbsp;Saverio Virdone ,&nbsp;Nils Kucher ,&nbsp;Stefano Barco","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the search for strategies to improve outcomes in affected individuals, including those initially managed in outpatient settings. Thromboembolic events have been reported as a concerning complication.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022362776).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, and OVID/Embase and CENTRAL from Cochrane for studies up to December 11, 2023, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with placebo or standard of care in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism, the composite of venous thromboembolism and major arterial cardiovascular events, and the individual components of the primary outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven randomized controlled trials and 3758 COVID-19 outpatients were included. When compared with placebo or standard of care, thromboprophylaxis was associated with similar rates of all-cause hospitalization or mortality (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) and lower rates of venous thromboembolism (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94), corresponding to a 0.6% absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat of 174.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients led to reduction in venous thromboembolism risk, with no impact on hospitalization or death. However, the overall low absolute risk reduction may not support its routine use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"8 8","pages":"Article 102613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory symptomatic patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Davide Di Vece ,&nbsp;Marco Valgimigli ,&nbsp;Elliot Barnathan ,&nbsp;Jean M. Connors ,&nbsp;Frank Cools ,&nbsp;Ulrike Held ,&nbsp;Ajay K. Kakkar ,&nbsp;Gregory Piazza ,&nbsp;David Spirk ,&nbsp;Saverio Virdone ,&nbsp;Nils Kucher ,&nbsp;Stefano Barco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the search for strategies to improve outcomes in affected individuals, including those initially managed in outpatient settings. Thromboembolic events have been reported as a concerning complication.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022362776).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, and OVID/Embase and CENTRAL from Cochrane for studies up to December 11, 2023, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with placebo or standard of care in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism, the composite of venous thromboembolism and major arterial cardiovascular events, and the individual components of the primary outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven randomized controlled trials and 3758 COVID-19 outpatients were included. When compared with placebo or standard of care, thromboprophylaxis was associated with similar rates of all-cause hospitalization or mortality (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) and lower rates of venous thromboembolism (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94), corresponding to a 0.6% absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat of 174.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients led to reduction in venous thromboembolism risk, with no impact on hospitalization or death. However, the overall low absolute risk reduction may not support its routine use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"8 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 102613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247503792400308X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247503792400308X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行的全球影响促使人们寻求改善受影响个体(包括最初在门诊环境中进行治疗的个体)预后的策略。血栓栓塞事件已被报道为一种令人担忧的并发症。目的评价新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)门诊患者初级血栓预防的有效性和安全性。该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022362776)。方法:本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,并从Cochrane全面检索PubMed/MEDLINE、ClinicalTrials.gov、OVID/Embase和CENTRAL,检索截至2023年12月11日的研究,无语言限制。在有症状的COVID-19门诊患者中,比较预防性剂量抗凝与安慰剂或标准护理的随机对照试验被纳入该分析。主要转归为全因住院和30天内死亡的综合转归。次要结局包括静脉血栓栓塞,静脉血栓栓塞和主要动脉心血管事件的复合,以及主要结局的各个组成部分。结果纳入7项随机对照试验和3758例COVID-19门诊患者。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,血栓预防与相似的全因住院率或死亡率相关(相对风险,1.00;95% CI, 0.77-1.31)和较低的静脉血栓栓塞率(相对危险度,0.28;95% CI, 0.08-0.94),对应于0.6%的绝对风险降低,需要治疗的人数为174人。结论有症状的COVID-19门诊患者预防血栓可降低静脉血栓栓塞风险,对住院和死亡无影响。然而,总体上较低的绝对风险降低可能不支持常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory symptomatic patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the search for strategies to improve outcomes in affected individuals, including those initially managed in outpatient settings. Thromboembolic events have been reported as a concerning complication.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022362776).

Methods

The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and OVID/Embase and CENTRAL from Cochrane for studies up to December 11, 2023, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with placebo or standard of care in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism, the composite of venous thromboembolism and major arterial cardiovascular events, and the individual components of the primary outcome.

Results

Seven randomized controlled trials and 3758 COVID-19 outpatients were included. When compared with placebo or standard of care, thromboprophylaxis was associated with similar rates of all-cause hospitalization or mortality (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) and lower rates of venous thromboembolism (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94), corresponding to a 0.6% absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat of 174.

Conclusion

Thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients led to reduction in venous thromboembolism risk, with no impact on hospitalization or death. However, the overall low absolute risk reduction may not support its routine use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
No correlation between thrombin generation and emicizumab levels: implications for monitoring emicizumab therapy. Characterization of bleeding in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the precaplacizumab era: a retrospective nationwide analysis. Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value. Health literacy in pediatric thrombosis: a landscape analysis. Time trends of catheter-directed treatment in acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1