不宁腿综合征的运动皮质兴奋性:通过经颅磁刺激的系统回顾和病理生理学的见解

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102027
Giuseppe Lanza , Maria Paola Mogavero , Raffaele Ferri , Tapas Pani
{"title":"不宁腿综合征的运动皮质兴奋性:通过经颅磁刺激的系统回顾和病理生理学的见解","authors":"Giuseppe Lanza ,&nbsp;Maria Paola Mogavero ,&nbsp;Raffaele Ferri ,&nbsp;Tapas Pani","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by a complex and only partially understood pathophysiology. Numerous studies have investigated motor cortex excitability in RLS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but a comprehensive systematic review assessing their methodological quality and synthesizing their findings is lacking. A systematic search of PubMed focused on various TMS parameters, including resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential characteristics, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods, and multiple measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using custom checklists and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Out of the studies screened, 21 (comprising 319 RLS patients and 278 healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. Despite considerable variability in TMS methodologies—such as differences in the muscles tested, interstimulus intervals, testing timing, and the potential confounding effects of medications—a consistent finding was a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition, a key indicator of central inhibitory GABAergic activity. Additionally, altered post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation suggest abnormal motor plasticity in RLS patients. These findings suggest that despite the methodological heterogeneity, TMS abnormalities may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of RLS. In this context, RLS symptoms are likely to originate at different levels within a complex neural network, ultimately leading to altered, possibly transient and circadian, excitability in a multifaceted neurophysiological system. While further rigorous research and reproducible evidence are needed, these insights may contribute to the identification of new diagnostic markers and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for RLS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102027"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motor cortex excitability in restless legs syndrome: A systematic review and insights into pathophysiology via transcranial magnetic stimulation\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Lanza ,&nbsp;Maria Paola Mogavero ,&nbsp;Raffaele Ferri ,&nbsp;Tapas Pani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by a complex and only partially understood pathophysiology. Numerous studies have investigated motor cortex excitability in RLS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but a comprehensive systematic review assessing their methodological quality and synthesizing their findings is lacking. A systematic search of PubMed focused on various TMS parameters, including resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential characteristics, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods, and multiple measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using custom checklists and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Out of the studies screened, 21 (comprising 319 RLS patients and 278 healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. Despite considerable variability in TMS methodologies—such as differences in the muscles tested, interstimulus intervals, testing timing, and the potential confounding effects of medications—a consistent finding was a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition, a key indicator of central inhibitory GABAergic activity. Additionally, altered post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation suggest abnormal motor plasticity in RLS patients. These findings suggest that despite the methodological heterogeneity, TMS abnormalities may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of RLS. In this context, RLS symptoms are likely to originate at different levels within a complex neural network, ultimately leading to altered, possibly transient and circadian, excitability in a multifaceted neurophysiological system. While further rigorous research and reproducible evidence are needed, these insights may contribute to the identification of new diagnostic markers and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for RLS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108707922400131X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108707922400131X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不宁腿综合征(RLS)是一种神经系统疾病,其特征是复杂且仅部分了解的病理生理学。许多研究利用经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究了RLS的运动皮层兴奋性,但缺乏对其方法质量和综合研究结果的全面系统评价。PubMed系统检索了TMS的各种参数,包括静息和活动运动阈值,运动诱发电位特征,对侧和同侧沉默期,以及多种皮质内抑制和促进措施。每项研究的质量都使用自定义清单和修改后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行评估。在筛选的研究中,21项(包括319名RLS患者和278名健康对照)符合纳入标准。尽管经颅磁刺激方法存在相当大的差异——比如测试肌肉、刺激间隔、测试时间和药物潜在的混淆效应的差异——但一致的发现是短间隔皮质内抑制减少,这是中枢抑制性gaba能活性的关键指标。此外,运动后促进和延迟促进的改变表明RLS患者的运动可塑性异常。这些发现表明,尽管方法上存在异质性,但颅磁刺激异常可能在RLS的病理生理中起着至关重要的作用。在这种情况下,RLS症状可能起源于复杂神经网络中的不同层次,最终导致多层神经生理系统中的兴奋性改变,可能是短暂的和昼夜节律的。虽然需要进一步严格的研究和可重复的证据,但这些见解可能有助于确定新的诊断标记和开发创新的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motor cortex excitability in restless legs syndrome: A systematic review and insights into pathophysiology via transcranial magnetic stimulation
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by a complex and only partially understood pathophysiology. Numerous studies have investigated motor cortex excitability in RLS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but a comprehensive systematic review assessing their methodological quality and synthesizing their findings is lacking. A systematic search of PubMed focused on various TMS parameters, including resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential characteristics, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods, and multiple measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using custom checklists and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Out of the studies screened, 21 (comprising 319 RLS patients and 278 healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. Despite considerable variability in TMS methodologies—such as differences in the muscles tested, interstimulus intervals, testing timing, and the potential confounding effects of medications—a consistent finding was a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition, a key indicator of central inhibitory GABAergic activity. Additionally, altered post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation suggest abnormal motor plasticity in RLS patients. These findings suggest that despite the methodological heterogeneity, TMS abnormalities may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of RLS. In this context, RLS symptoms are likely to originate at different levels within a complex neural network, ultimately leading to altered, possibly transient and circadian, excitability in a multifaceted neurophysiological system. While further rigorous research and reproducible evidence are needed, these insights may contribute to the identification of new diagnostic markers and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for RLS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
期刊最新文献
Do sleepless nights turn into painful days? Opportunities and challenges in detecting and synthesising the day-to-day sleep-pain relationship. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia across the spectrum of alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AI-enhanced imagery rehearsal therapy: A novel approach to treating nightmare disorder. Psychopathology and NREM sleep parasomnias: A systematic review. Pre-and post-migration factors associated with sleep health among Latin American immigrants in the United States: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1