胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂伏拉吉单抗治疗1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15262
Deep Dutta, A. B. M. Kamrul-Hasan, Vineet Surana, Rajiv Singla, Deepak Khandelwal, Sameer Aggarwal, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya
{"title":"胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂伏拉吉单抗治疗1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Deep Dutta, A. B. M. Kamrul-Hasan, Vineet Surana, Rajiv Singla, Deepak Khandelwal, Sameer Aggarwal, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The glucagon receptor antagonist (GRA) volagidemab is the first-in-class fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits glucagon receptor. GRA can improve glycemia by reducing endogenous glucose production and reduce risks of diabetic ketoacidosis by suppressing ketogenesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of volagidemab in type-1 diabetes (T1D). Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving T1D patients receiving volagidemab. The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in total daily dose (TDD) of insulin. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in measures of glycemia, hypoglycemia, and adverse events. Data from 3 RCTs (98 patients) were analyzed. Volagidemab (70 mg/week) was associated with a significant reduction in TDD of insulin requirement (mean difference [MD]: −8.45 units/day (95% confidence interval [CI]: [−12.09, −4.81]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and average blood glucose (MD: −21.42 mg/dL (95% CI: [−37.10, −5.74]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), compared to placebo. Volagidemab use was associated with a significant increase in time in range (blood glucose: 70–180 mg/dL) (MD: 10.93% (95% CI: [6.69, 15.17]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 55%; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01) and significant reduction in time above range (blood glucose &gt;180 mg/dL) (MD: −11.93% (95% CI: [−14.71, −9.15]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 6%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) without any impact on time below range (blood glucose &lt;70 mg/dL) (MD: 0.14% (95% CI: [−0.56, 0.84]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.70), compared to placebo. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96 (95% CI: [0.36, 2.56]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 8%; <i>p</i> = 0.94) and hypoglycemia (OR: 0.56 (95% CI: [0.11, 2.89]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>p </i>= 0.49) were similar among volagidemab users as compared to placebo. Short-term volagidemab use was associated with significant reduction in insulin requirement along with improvement in glycemia.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of the glucagon receptor antagonist volagidemab in type-1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Deep Dutta, A. B. M. Kamrul-Hasan, Vineet Surana, Rajiv Singla, Deepak Khandelwal, Sameer Aggarwal, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nyas.15262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The glucagon receptor antagonist (GRA) volagidemab is the first-in-class fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits glucagon receptor. GRA can improve glycemia by reducing endogenous glucose production and reduce risks of diabetic ketoacidosis by suppressing ketogenesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of volagidemab in type-1 diabetes (T1D). Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving T1D patients receiving volagidemab. The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in total daily dose (TDD) of insulin. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in measures of glycemia, hypoglycemia, and adverse events. Data from 3 RCTs (98 patients) were analyzed. Volagidemab (70 mg/week) was associated with a significant reduction in TDD of insulin requirement (mean difference [MD]: −8.45 units/day (95% confidence interval [CI]: [−12.09, −4.81]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and average blood glucose (MD: −21.42 mg/dL (95% CI: [−37.10, −5.74]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), compared to placebo. Volagidemab use was associated with a significant increase in time in range (blood glucose: 70–180 mg/dL) (MD: 10.93% (95% CI: [6.69, 15.17]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 55%; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01) and significant reduction in time above range (blood glucose &gt;180 mg/dL) (MD: −11.93% (95% CI: [−14.71, −9.15]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 6%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) without any impact on time below range (blood glucose &lt;70 mg/dL) (MD: 0.14% (95% CI: [−0.56, 0.84]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.70), compared to placebo. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96 (95% CI: [0.36, 2.56]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 8%; <i>p</i> = 0.94) and hypoglycemia (OR: 0.56 (95% CI: [0.11, 2.89]); <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>p </i>= 0.49) were similar among volagidemab users as compared to placebo. Short-term volagidemab use was associated with significant reduction in insulin requirement along with improvement in glycemia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂(GRA) volagidemab是同类首个抑制胰高血糖素受体的全人源单克隆抗体。GRA可以通过减少内源性葡萄糖生成来改善血糖,并通过抑制酮生来降低糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险。本系统综述和荟萃分析分析了volagidemab治疗1型糖尿病(T1D)的有效性和安全性。电子数据库检索了随机对照试验(rct),这些试验涉及接受volagidemab治疗的T1D患者。主要结局是评估胰岛素总日剂量(TDD)的变化。次要结局是评估血糖、低血糖和不良事件测量的变化。对3项随机对照试验(98例)的数据进行分析。Volagidemab (70 mg/周)与胰岛素需求TDD显著降低相关(平均差异[MD]:−8.45单位/天(95%可信区间[CI]:[−12.09,−4.81]);i2 = 83%;p & lt;0.01)和平均血糖(MD:−21.42 mg/dL (95% CI:[−37.10,−5.74]);i2 = 88%;p & lt;0.01)。使用Volagidemab与范围内时间(血糖:70-180 mg/dL)的显著增加相关(MD: 10.93% (95% CI: [6.69, 15.17]);i2 = 55%;p & lt;0.01),在此范围内(血糖≤180 mg/dL)显著降低(MD: - 11.93% (95% CI: [- 14.71, - 9.15]);i2 = 6%;p & lt;0.01),对血糖≤70 mg/dL的时间无影响(MD: 0.14% (95% CI: [- 0.56, 0.84]);i2 = 0%;P = 0.70)。治疗中出现的不良事件的发生(优势比[OR]: 0.96 (95% CI: [0.36, 2.56]);i2 = 8%;p = 0.94)和低血糖(OR: 0.56 (95% CI: [0.11, 2.89]);i2 = 0%;P = 0.49), volagidemab服用者与安慰剂服用者相似。短期使用伏拉吉单抗与胰岛素需求的显著降低以及血糖的改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of the glucagon receptor antagonist volagidemab in type-1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
The glucagon receptor antagonist (GRA) volagidemab is the first-in-class fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits glucagon receptor. GRA can improve glycemia by reducing endogenous glucose production and reduce risks of diabetic ketoacidosis by suppressing ketogenesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of volagidemab in type-1 diabetes (T1D). Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving T1D patients receiving volagidemab. The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in total daily dose (TDD) of insulin. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in measures of glycemia, hypoglycemia, and adverse events. Data from 3 RCTs (98 patients) were analyzed. Volagidemab (70 mg/week) was associated with a significant reduction in TDD of insulin requirement (mean difference [MD]: −8.45 units/day (95% confidence interval [CI]: [−12.09, −4.81]); I2 = 83%; p < 0.01) and average blood glucose (MD: −21.42 mg/dL (95% CI: [−37.10, −5.74]); I2 = 88%; p < 0.01), compared to placebo. Volagidemab use was associated with a significant increase in time in range (blood glucose: 70–180 mg/dL) (MD: 10.93% (95% CI: [6.69, 15.17]); I2 = 55%; < 0.01) and significant reduction in time above range (blood glucose >180 mg/dL) (MD: −11.93% (95% CI: [−14.71, −9.15]); I2 = 6%; p < 0.01) without any impact on time below range (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) (MD: 0.14% (95% CI: [−0.56, 0.84]); I2 = 0%; p = 0.70), compared to placebo. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96 (95% CI: [0.36, 2.56]); I2 = 8%; p = 0.94) and hypoglycemia (OR: 0.56 (95% CI: [0.11, 2.89]); I2 = 0%; = 0.49) were similar among volagidemab users as compared to placebo. Short-term volagidemab use was associated with significant reduction in insulin requirement along with improvement in glycemia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
Vegetation–climate feedbacks across scales MI-Mamba: A hybrid motor imagery electroencephalograph classification model with Mamba's global scanning Math-anxious people suffer more in math-related events: The perspective of reward processing on motivated behavior Digital tools and technologies used in food fortification: A scoping review Spiny mice (Acomys) have evolved cellular features to support regenerative healing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1