Brabant指数评价牙体大磨损量和方向的视觉指南

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY International Journal of Osteoarchaeology Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1002/oa.3349
Judyta Olszewski, Jason Hemingway, Victoria E. Gibbon
{"title":"Brabant指数评价牙体大磨损量和方向的视觉指南","authors":"Judyta Olszewski,&nbsp;Jason Hemingway,&nbsp;Victoria E. Gibbon","doi":"10.1002/oa.3349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to reduce subjectivity bias in scoring dental macrowear quantity and direction using the Brabant index, which previously relied solely on written descriptions. To achieve this, we present a new, optimized visual guide incorporating buccal and lingual scores. The optimization process involved conceptualizing and illustrating a visual guide using Holocene southern African hunter-gatherer and herder teeth, featuring both buccal and lingual scores for multicuspid teeth. The guide was hand-drawn using a stippling technique and digitized to depict surface details for each wear stage and tooth type. We conducted intra- and inter-observer assessments to evaluate the optimized method using both the original and optimized Brabant indices. Statistical analysis was performed in R using Cohen's kappa for direction and Cohen's weighted kappa for quantity. Intra-observer results for the original method yielded kappa values of 0.84 for direction and 0.94 for quantity, while the optimized version both resulted in improved values of 0.99. Inter-observer results revealed some differences between an inexperienced and an experienced observer. The inexperienced observer achieved kappa scores of 0.20 for direction and 0.86 for quantity with the original method, and 0.17 and 0.80, respectively, with the optimized version. The experienced observer's results using the original index were 0.66 for direction and 0.89 for quantity, and 0.75 and 0.96, respectively, with the optimized version. These findings demonstrate that the optimized method enhances data reliability for experienced observers, highlighting the value of a published visual guide and multicuspid scoring adjustments. However, reduced or unappreciable changes in accuracies for the inexperienced observer illustrate the need for dental expertise when scoring for dental wear, even with a modified method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A visual guide for the Brabant index to score dental macrowear quantity and direction\",\"authors\":\"Judyta Olszewski,&nbsp;Jason Hemingway,&nbsp;Victoria E. Gibbon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oa.3349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to reduce subjectivity bias in scoring dental macrowear quantity and direction using the Brabant index, which previously relied solely on written descriptions. To achieve this, we present a new, optimized visual guide incorporating buccal and lingual scores. The optimization process involved conceptualizing and illustrating a visual guide using Holocene southern African hunter-gatherer and herder teeth, featuring both buccal and lingual scores for multicuspid teeth. The guide was hand-drawn using a stippling technique and digitized to depict surface details for each wear stage and tooth type. We conducted intra- and inter-observer assessments to evaluate the optimized method using both the original and optimized Brabant indices. Statistical analysis was performed in R using Cohen's kappa for direction and Cohen's weighted kappa for quantity. Intra-observer results for the original method yielded kappa values of 0.84 for direction and 0.94 for quantity, while the optimized version both resulted in improved values of 0.99. Inter-observer results revealed some differences between an inexperienced and an experienced observer. The inexperienced observer achieved kappa scores of 0.20 for direction and 0.86 for quantity with the original method, and 0.17 and 0.80, respectively, with the optimized version. The experienced observer's results using the original index were 0.66 for direction and 0.89 for quantity, and 0.75 and 0.96, respectively, with the optimized version. These findings demonstrate that the optimized method enhances data reliability for experienced observers, highlighting the value of a published visual guide and multicuspid scoring adjustments. However, reduced or unappreciable changes in accuracies for the inexperienced observer illustrate the need for dental expertise when scoring for dental wear, even with a modified method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3349\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在减少使用Brabant指数评分牙齿宏观磨损数量和方向的主观性偏差,该指数以前完全依赖于书面描述。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一种新的,优化的视觉指南,包括口腔和语言评分。优化过程包括概念化和说明使用全新世南部非洲狩猎采集者和牧民牙齿的视觉指南,具有多尖齿牙齿的颊和舌评分。该指南使用点画技术手绘,并数字化描绘每个磨损阶段和齿型的表面细节。我们使用原始和优化后的Brabant指数对优化后的方法进行了内部和内部的评估。在R中使用Cohen's kappa作为方向,Cohen's加权kappa作为数量进行统计分析。原始方法的观察者内部结果显示,方向kappa值为0.84,数量kappa值为0.94,而优化版本的kappa值均提高了0.99。观察者之间的结果揭示了没有经验和有经验的观察者之间的一些差异。对于没有经验的观察者,原始方法的方向kappa得分为0.20,数量kappa得分为0.86,优化版本kappa得分为0.17,数量kappa得分为0.80。有经验的观测者使用原始指数的结果,方向为0.66,数量为0.89,优化版本的结果分别为0.75和0.96。这些发现表明,优化的方法提高了经验丰富的观察者的数据可靠性,突出了出版的视觉指南和多尖评分调整的价值。然而,对于没有经验的观察者来说,准确性的降低或不可察觉的变化表明,即使使用改进的方法,在对牙齿磨损进行评分时也需要牙科专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A visual guide for the Brabant index to score dental macrowear quantity and direction

This study aimed to reduce subjectivity bias in scoring dental macrowear quantity and direction using the Brabant index, which previously relied solely on written descriptions. To achieve this, we present a new, optimized visual guide incorporating buccal and lingual scores. The optimization process involved conceptualizing and illustrating a visual guide using Holocene southern African hunter-gatherer and herder teeth, featuring both buccal and lingual scores for multicuspid teeth. The guide was hand-drawn using a stippling technique and digitized to depict surface details for each wear stage and tooth type. We conducted intra- and inter-observer assessments to evaluate the optimized method using both the original and optimized Brabant indices. Statistical analysis was performed in R using Cohen's kappa for direction and Cohen's weighted kappa for quantity. Intra-observer results for the original method yielded kappa values of 0.84 for direction and 0.94 for quantity, while the optimized version both resulted in improved values of 0.99. Inter-observer results revealed some differences between an inexperienced and an experienced observer. The inexperienced observer achieved kappa scores of 0.20 for direction and 0.86 for quantity with the original method, and 0.17 and 0.80, respectively, with the optimized version. The experienced observer's results using the original index were 0.66 for direction and 0.89 for quantity, and 0.75 and 0.96, respectively, with the optimized version. These findings demonstrate that the optimized method enhances data reliability for experienced observers, highlighting the value of a published visual guide and multicuspid scoring adjustments. However, reduced or unappreciable changes in accuracies for the inexperienced observer illustrate the need for dental expertise when scoring for dental wear, even with a modified method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Writing a First Osteoarchaeology Article: Some Advice for Early Career Researchers Inflammatory arthropathies: Perspectives from a Portuguese male individual (1574–1834 CE) A life course study of the Beixin culture residents from the Neolithic site of Xiaheqiadong, Shandong Province, China Morphological study of the bony labyrinth of the last hunter-gatherers in Portugal: Insights from the Moita do Sebastião shell midden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1