加压二硅酸锂陶瓷与5Y-TZP氧化锆在不同载荷下的疲劳性能和可靠性比较。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental Materials Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2024.11.005
Ramona Buser , Mustafa Borga Dönmez , Moritz Hoffmann , Rüdiger Hampe , Bogna Stawarczyk
{"title":"加压二硅酸锂陶瓷与5Y-TZP氧化锆在不同载荷下的疲劳性能和可靠性比较。","authors":"Ramona Buser ,&nbsp;Mustafa Borga Dönmez ,&nbsp;Moritz Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Rüdiger Hampe ,&nbsp;Bogna Stawarczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the fatigue behavior and reliability of 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics and a 5 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (5Y-TZP) when 3 dynamic loading protocols were used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Bar-shaped specimens (30 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated from 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics (AMB, CEL, INI, IPS, and LIV) and a 5Y-TZP (ZR) (N = 324). Six specimens from each material were subjected to a static 4-point fracture load test, while the remaining specimens were subjected dynamic loading by increasing the starting load (30 % of the static fracture load) in every 5000 cycles by 50 N (loading protocol 1), in every 5000 cycles by 5 % (loading protocol 2) or in every 1000 cycles by 10 N (loading protocol 3) until fracture (n = 16). The fracture load, flexural strength, and number of cycles until failure were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Scheffé tests. The survival rate was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and further compared with Mantel-Cox test, while the correlation between the fracture load and flexural strength was analyzed with Pearson’s correlation test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interaction between the materials and the loading protocol affected the number of cycles until failure, while the material type affected fracture load and flexural strength values (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). ZR had the highest and LIV mostly had lower fracture load and flexural strength (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.034). A positive correlation was found between the fracture load and flexural strength (r = 0.997, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For lithium disilicate ceramics, loading protocol 2 and for ZR, loading protocols 1 and 3 led to the highest number of cycles and survival rate (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.041). Regardless of the loading protocol, all lithium disilicate ceramics had a similar fragmentation pattern with single compression curls and 2-piece fractures were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Tested materials are suitable for adhesively luted monolithic single-unit prosthesis as they had mean flexural strength values higher than 100 MPa. Measuring the fracture load with loading protocol 3 can be considered time-efficient to evaluate the fatigue behavior of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue behavior and reliability of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics compared to 5Y-TZP zirconia under different loading protocols\",\"authors\":\"Ramona Buser ,&nbsp;Mustafa Borga Dönmez ,&nbsp;Moritz Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Rüdiger Hampe ,&nbsp;Bogna Stawarczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dental.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the fatigue behavior and reliability of 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics and a 5 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (5Y-TZP) when 3 dynamic loading protocols were used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Bar-shaped specimens (30 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated from 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics (AMB, CEL, INI, IPS, and LIV) and a 5Y-TZP (ZR) (N = 324). Six specimens from each material were subjected to a static 4-point fracture load test, while the remaining specimens were subjected dynamic loading by increasing the starting load (30 % of the static fracture load) in every 5000 cycles by 50 N (loading protocol 1), in every 5000 cycles by 5 % (loading protocol 2) or in every 1000 cycles by 10 N (loading protocol 3) until fracture (n = 16). The fracture load, flexural strength, and number of cycles until failure were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Scheffé tests. The survival rate was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and further compared with Mantel-Cox test, while the correlation between the fracture load and flexural strength was analyzed with Pearson’s correlation test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interaction between the materials and the loading protocol affected the number of cycles until failure, while the material type affected fracture load and flexural strength values (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). ZR had the highest and LIV mostly had lower fracture load and flexural strength (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.034). A positive correlation was found between the fracture load and flexural strength (r = 0.997, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For lithium disilicate ceramics, loading protocol 2 and for ZR, loading protocols 1 and 3 led to the highest number of cycles and survival rate (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.041). Regardless of the loading protocol, all lithium disilicate ceramics had a similar fragmentation pattern with single compression curls and 2-piece fractures were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Tested materials are suitable for adhesively luted monolithic single-unit prosthesis as they had mean flexural strength values higher than 100 MPa. Measuring the fracture load with loading protocol 3 can be considered time-efficient to evaluate the fatigue behavior of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Materials\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124003415\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124003415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较5种压型二硅酸锂陶瓷和5 mol%钇稳定氧化锆(5Y-TZP)在3种动态加载方式下的疲劳性能和可靠性。方法:用5种压型二硅酸锂陶瓷(AMB, CEL, INI, IPS, LIV)和5Y-TZP (ZR) (N = 324)制备棒状样品(30 × 4 × 3 mm)。每种材料的6个试样进行静态4点断裂载荷试验,其余试样进行动态加载,每5000次循环增加50 N(加载方案1),每5000次循环增加5%(加载方案2)或每1000次循环增加10 N(加载方案3),直到断裂(N = 16)。采用双向方差分析和scheff试验对断裂载荷、抗弯强度和循环次数进行分析。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Mantel-Cox检验比较存活率,采用Pearson相关检验分析断裂载荷与抗弯强度的相关性(α = 0.05)。还进行了断口分析。结果:材料和加载方案之间的相互作用影响到失效循环次数,而材料类型影响断裂载荷和抗弯强度值(P)。意义:试验材料的平均抗弯强度值大于100 MPa,适用于粘结式单单元假体。采用加载方案3测量断裂载荷可被认为是评估压压二硅酸锂陶瓷疲劳行为的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fatigue behavior and reliability of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics compared to 5Y-TZP zirconia under different loading protocols

Objective

To compare the fatigue behavior and reliability of 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics and a 5 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (5Y-TZP) when 3 dynamic loading protocols were used.

Methods

Bar-shaped specimens (30 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated from 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics (AMB, CEL, INI, IPS, and LIV) and a 5Y-TZP (ZR) (N = 324). Six specimens from each material were subjected to a static 4-point fracture load test, while the remaining specimens were subjected dynamic loading by increasing the starting load (30 % of the static fracture load) in every 5000 cycles by 50 N (loading protocol 1), in every 5000 cycles by 5 % (loading protocol 2) or in every 1000 cycles by 10 N (loading protocol 3) until fracture (n = 16). The fracture load, flexural strength, and number of cycles until failure were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Scheffé tests. The survival rate was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and further compared with Mantel-Cox test, while the correlation between the fracture load and flexural strength was analyzed with Pearson’s correlation test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was also performed.

Results

The interaction between the materials and the loading protocol affected the number of cycles until failure, while the material type affected fracture load and flexural strength values (P < 0.001). ZR had the highest and LIV mostly had lower fracture load and flexural strength (P ≤ 0.034). A positive correlation was found between the fracture load and flexural strength (r = 0.997, P < 0.001). For lithium disilicate ceramics, loading protocol 2 and for ZR, loading protocols 1 and 3 led to the highest number of cycles and survival rate (P ≤ 0.041). Regardless of the loading protocol, all lithium disilicate ceramics had a similar fragmentation pattern with single compression curls and 2-piece fractures were observed.

Significance

Tested materials are suitable for adhesively luted monolithic single-unit prosthesis as they had mean flexural strength values higher than 100 MPa. Measuring the fracture load with loading protocol 3 can be considered time-efficient to evaluate the fatigue behavior of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Direct colour printing on zirconia using 222 nm UV-C photons Bonding neat hydrophobic-rich resins to etched dentin: A proof of concept Effect of preparation designs and CAD-CAM materials on step-stress fatigue survival of premolar partial coverage restorations: An in-vitro study with fractographic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1