{"title":"早产儿试验体重验证。","authors":"Meredith Kinoshita, Martin J White, Anne Doolan","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Accuracy in the assessment of feed intake is important for preterm infants at risk of growth failure. Clinical observation tools are unvalidated in this population, and test weight measurement may be inaccurate in preterm infants taking small feed volumes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Test weights were performed to assess agreement between weights using a standardized protocol and a feed of known weight in preterm infants (born at <35 weeks gestational age [GA]) during their transition to oral feeding. Reproducibility was assessed using two repeated measurements in each participant. Agreement between test weights and known feed weights was assessed, and minimal detectable change was calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight preterm infants (GA 30 + 5 (28-33 + 1), birth weight 1574 g (+/- 671 g)) were recruited and had test weights performed at CGA 35 + 3 (± 10 days). Each infant was weighed twice before and twice after each measured feed, and a high degree of reproducibility was found for both the paired pre-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99] and the paired post-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99]. The mean absolute difference between test weight and feed weight was 1.7 g (±2.2). We calculated the minimum detectable change as 0.96 g, representing the magnitude of change below which there is more than 95% chance that no real change occurred. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> During the establishment of oral feeds, a standardized protocol at the bedside for repeated pre- and post-feed weights demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility. Based on our data, test weight measurements are appropriate for use in this preterm population during the establishment of oral feeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test Weight Validation in Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Kinoshita, Martin J White, Anne Doolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bfm.2024.0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Accuracy in the assessment of feed intake is important for preterm infants at risk of growth failure. Clinical observation tools are unvalidated in this population, and test weight measurement may be inaccurate in preterm infants taking small feed volumes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Test weights were performed to assess agreement between weights using a standardized protocol and a feed of known weight in preterm infants (born at <35 weeks gestational age [GA]) during their transition to oral feeding. Reproducibility was assessed using two repeated measurements in each participant. Agreement between test weights and known feed weights was assessed, and minimal detectable change was calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight preterm infants (GA 30 + 5 (28-33 + 1), birth weight 1574 g (+/- 671 g)) were recruited and had test weights performed at CGA 35 + 3 (± 10 days). Each infant was weighed twice before and twice after each measured feed, and a high degree of reproducibility was found for both the paired pre-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99] and the paired post-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99]. The mean absolute difference between test weight and feed weight was 1.7 g (±2.2). We calculated the minimum detectable change as 0.96 g, representing the magnitude of change below which there is more than 95% chance that no real change occurred. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> During the establishment of oral feeds, a standardized protocol at the bedside for repeated pre- and post-feed weights demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility. Based on our data, test weight measurements are appropriate for use in this preterm population during the establishment of oral feeds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Accuracy in the assessment of feed intake is important for preterm infants at risk of growth failure. Clinical observation tools are unvalidated in this population, and test weight measurement may be inaccurate in preterm infants taking small feed volumes. Methods: Test weights were performed to assess agreement between weights using a standardized protocol and a feed of known weight in preterm infants (born at <35 weeks gestational age [GA]) during their transition to oral feeding. Reproducibility was assessed using two repeated measurements in each participant. Agreement between test weights and known feed weights was assessed, and minimal detectable change was calculated. Results: Thirty-eight preterm infants (GA 30 + 5 (28-33 + 1), birth weight 1574 g (+/- 671 g)) were recruited and had test weights performed at CGA 35 + 3 (± 10 days). Each infant was weighed twice before and twice after each measured feed, and a high degree of reproducibility was found for both the paired pre-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99] and the paired post-feed weights, ICC = 0.99 [0.99-0.99]. The mean absolute difference between test weight and feed weight was 1.7 g (±2.2). We calculated the minimum detectable change as 0.96 g, representing the magnitude of change below which there is more than 95% chance that no real change occurred. Conclusions: During the establishment of oral feeds, a standardized protocol at the bedside for repeated pre- and post-feed weights demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility. Based on our data, test weight measurements are appropriate for use in this preterm population during the establishment of oral feeds.
期刊介绍:
Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols.
Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes:
Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols
Health consequences of artificial feeding
Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk
Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother
Breastfeeding indications and contraindications
Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications
Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant
Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother
Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication
Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding
The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking
Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital
Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity
International public health issues including social and economic issues.