Ahmed Al Qady, Wafa Aldhaleei, Mohamed Salih, Marriam Ali, Sasmith Menakuru, Kapil Dev Nayar, Zhen Wang, Fernando F Stancampiano, Dana Harris, Yan Bi
{"title":"耐克拉霉素幽门螺杆菌粪便聚合酶链反应检测的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmed Al Qady, Wafa Aldhaleei, Mohamed Salih, Marriam Ali, Sasmith Menakuru, Kapil Dev Nayar, Zhen Wang, Fernando F Stancampiano, Dana Harris, Yan Bi","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increasing prevalence of clarithromycin (CLA)-resistant Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) strains poses a significant challenge in the management of H. pylori infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in identifying CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in stool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 30, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated the effectiveness of PCR stool tests in detecting CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in adults (>18-year-old). Studies of pediatric populations, alternative methods to PCR or stool samples, and reference tests other than gastric biopsy were excluded. The bivariate random-effects model was used to pool diagnostic accuracy from the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 11 prospective diagnostic studies with a total of 866 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.9-0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00). Subgroup analysis based on the used technique demonstrated consistent findings without notable variations. The diagnostic odds ratio was calculated at 1843.92 (95% CI: 134.28-25,321.3). The positive likelihood ratio was determined as 51.02 (95% CI: 4.61-564.5), while the negative likelihood ratio was found to be 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.1).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PCR testing for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was highly sensitive and specific across studies with proven reliability in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient settings. Their implementation offers cost-effectiveness and the potential for tailored treatment strategies, holding promise for improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Fecal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Clarithromycin-Resistant Helicobacter Pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Al Qady, Wafa Aldhaleei, Mohamed Salih, Marriam Ali, Sasmith Menakuru, Kapil Dev Nayar, Zhen Wang, Fernando F Stancampiano, Dana Harris, Yan Bi\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increasing prevalence of clarithromycin (CLA)-resistant Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) strains poses a significant challenge in the management of H. pylori infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in identifying CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in stool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 30, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated the effectiveness of PCR stool tests in detecting CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in adults (>18-year-old). Studies of pediatric populations, alternative methods to PCR or stool samples, and reference tests other than gastric biopsy were excluded. The bivariate random-effects model was used to pool diagnostic accuracy from the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 11 prospective diagnostic studies with a total of 866 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.9-0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00). Subgroup analysis based on the used technique demonstrated consistent findings without notable variations. The diagnostic odds ratio was calculated at 1843.92 (95% CI: 134.28-25,321.3). The positive likelihood ratio was determined as 51.02 (95% CI: 4.61-564.5), while the negative likelihood ratio was found to be 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.1).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PCR testing for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was highly sensitive and specific across studies with proven reliability in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient settings. Their implementation offers cost-effectiveness and the potential for tailored treatment strategies, holding promise for improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000792\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of Fecal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Clarithromycin-Resistant Helicobacter Pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: The increasing prevalence of clarithromycin (CLA)-resistant Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) strains poses a significant challenge in the management of H. pylori infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in identifying CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in stool.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 30, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated the effectiveness of PCR stool tests in detecting CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in adults (>18-year-old). Studies of pediatric populations, alternative methods to PCR or stool samples, and reference tests other than gastric biopsy were excluded. The bivariate random-effects model was used to pool diagnostic accuracy from the included studies.
Results: The analysis of 11 prospective diagnostic studies with a total of 866 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.9-0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00). Subgroup analysis based on the used technique demonstrated consistent findings without notable variations. The diagnostic odds ratio was calculated at 1843.92 (95% CI: 134.28-25,321.3). The positive likelihood ratio was determined as 51.02 (95% CI: 4.61-564.5), while the negative likelihood ratio was found to be 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.1).
Discussion: PCR testing for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was highly sensitive and specific across studies with proven reliability in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient settings. Their implementation offers cost-effectiveness and the potential for tailored treatment strategies, holding promise for improved patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease.
Colon and small bowel
Endoscopy and novel diagnostics
Esophagus
Functional GI disorders
Immunology of the GI tract
Microbiology of the GI tract
Inflammatory bowel disease
Pancreas and biliary tract
Liver
Pathology
Pediatrics
Preventative medicine
Nutrition/obesity
Stomach.