中国皮肤科医生对特应性皮炎局部抗炎药选择的看法及影响因素:一项横断面调查研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCID.S487996
Jian Hu, Qiuyu Jia, Wenge Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang, Houmin Li
{"title":"中国皮肤科医生对特应性皮炎局部抗炎药选择的看法及影响因素:一项横断面调查研究。","authors":"Jian Hu, Qiuyu Jia, Wenge Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang, Houmin Li","doi":"10.2147/CCID.S487996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) inhibitors are three common topical anti-inflammatory agents for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The purpose of our study was to understand Chinese dermatologists' perceptions and the factors influencing their choices of the three agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire survey was conducted between 25 July 2022 and 25 August 2022 among Chinese dermatologists. The survey with six multiple-choice questions focused on what were their most commonly prescribed agents for treating AD, and what factors influenced their choices of the three agents. The results were assessed by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1, 156 valid questionnaire replies were received. For treating AD, 79.84% of Chinese dermatologists chose TCS, 81.40% chose TCI, and 18.25% chose PDE-4 inhibitors. When TCS was not chosen, the three principal reasons included local adverse effects (85.56%), suspicious infection on lesioned area (71.54%), and patient steroid phobia (61.59%). Coincidentally, when the TCI and PDE-4 inhibitors were chosen, the main reason was patient steroid phobia (76.21% and 74.74% respectively) against TCS. When PDE-4 inhibitors were not chosen, the major reasons were their intolerable adverse effects (80.36%) and their slower onset and weak efficacy (57.61%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that more senior dermatologists were less likely to choose TCS for the reason of local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia (each <i>P</i> < 0.05), they were more likely to choose TCI for the same reason of patient steroid phobia against TCS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia were the reasons that limited Chinese dermatologists from choosing TCS for treating AD. Instead, more of them choose to use TCI. PDE-4 inhibitors were sometimes considered as an alternative to TCS or TCI, but its local adverse effects and limited efficacy affected the choice of this agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":"17 ","pages":"2713-2723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dermatologists' Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Selection of Topical Anti-Inflammatory Agents for Atopic Dermatitis in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Hu, Qiuyu Jia, Wenge Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang, Houmin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CCID.S487996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) inhibitors are three common topical anti-inflammatory agents for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The purpose of our study was to understand Chinese dermatologists' perceptions and the factors influencing their choices of the three agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire survey was conducted between 25 July 2022 and 25 August 2022 among Chinese dermatologists. The survey with six multiple-choice questions focused on what were their most commonly prescribed agents for treating AD, and what factors influenced their choices of the three agents. The results were assessed by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1, 156 valid questionnaire replies were received. For treating AD, 79.84% of Chinese dermatologists chose TCS, 81.40% chose TCI, and 18.25% chose PDE-4 inhibitors. When TCS was not chosen, the three principal reasons included local adverse effects (85.56%), suspicious infection on lesioned area (71.54%), and patient steroid phobia (61.59%). Coincidentally, when the TCI and PDE-4 inhibitors were chosen, the main reason was patient steroid phobia (76.21% and 74.74% respectively) against TCS. When PDE-4 inhibitors were not chosen, the major reasons were their intolerable adverse effects (80.36%) and their slower onset and weak efficacy (57.61%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that more senior dermatologists were less likely to choose TCS for the reason of local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia (each <i>P</i> < 0.05), they were more likely to choose TCI for the same reason of patient steroid phobia against TCS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia were the reasons that limited Chinese dermatologists from choosing TCS for treating AD. Instead, more of them choose to use TCI. PDE-4 inhibitors were sometimes considered as an alternative to TCS or TCI, but its local adverse effects and limited efficacy affected the choice of this agent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"2713-2723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S487996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S487996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:外用皮质类固醇(TCS)、外用钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(TCI)和磷酸二酯酶4 (PDE-4)抑制剂是治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的三种常用外用抗炎药。本研究的目的是了解中国皮肤科医生对这三种药物的看法以及影响他们选择这三种药物的因素。方法:于2022年7月25日至2022年8月25日对中国皮肤科医生进行在线问卷调查。这项调查有六个选择题,主要是关于他们最常用的治疗阿尔茨海默病的药物,以及哪些因素影响了他们对这三种药物的选择。采用卡方检验和logistic回归分析对结果进行评价。结果:共收到有效问卷1156份。对于AD的治疗,79.84%的中国皮肤科医生选择TCS, 81.40%选择TCI, 18.25%选择PDE-4抑制剂。未选择TCS时,3个主要原因为局部不良反应(85.56%)、病变部位可疑感染(71.54%)和患者类固醇恐惧(61.59%)。巧合的是,当选择TCI和PDE-4抑制剂时,主要原因是患者对TCS的类固醇恐惧(分别为76.21%和74.74%)。未选择PDE-4抑制剂的主要原因是不良反应难以忍受(80.36%),起效较慢(57.61%)。Logistic回归分析显示,因局部不良反应和患者类固醇恐惧而选择TCS的资深皮肤科医生较多(P < 0.05),因患者对TCS的类固醇恐惧而选择TCI的资深皮肤科医生较多(P < 0.05)。结论:局部不良反应和患者对类固醇的恐惧是限制我国皮肤科医生选择TCS治疗AD的原因。相反,更多的人选择使用TCI。PDE-4抑制剂有时被认为是TCS或TCI的替代品,但其局部不良反应和有限的疗效影响了该药物的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dermatologists' Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Selection of Topical Anti-Inflammatory Agents for Atopic Dermatitis in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Objective: Topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) inhibitors are three common topical anti-inflammatory agents for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The purpose of our study was to understand Chinese dermatologists' perceptions and the factors influencing their choices of the three agents.

Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted between 25 July 2022 and 25 August 2022 among Chinese dermatologists. The survey with six multiple-choice questions focused on what were their most commonly prescribed agents for treating AD, and what factors influenced their choices of the three agents. The results were assessed by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 1, 156 valid questionnaire replies were received. For treating AD, 79.84% of Chinese dermatologists chose TCS, 81.40% chose TCI, and 18.25% chose PDE-4 inhibitors. When TCS was not chosen, the three principal reasons included local adverse effects (85.56%), suspicious infection on lesioned area (71.54%), and patient steroid phobia (61.59%). Coincidentally, when the TCI and PDE-4 inhibitors were chosen, the main reason was patient steroid phobia (76.21% and 74.74% respectively) against TCS. When PDE-4 inhibitors were not chosen, the major reasons were their intolerable adverse effects (80.36%) and their slower onset and weak efficacy (57.61%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that more senior dermatologists were less likely to choose TCS for the reason of local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia (each P < 0.05), they were more likely to choose TCI for the same reason of patient steroid phobia against TCS (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Local adverse effects and patient steroid phobia were the reasons that limited Chinese dermatologists from choosing TCS for treating AD. Instead, more of them choose to use TCI. PDE-4 inhibitors were sometimes considered as an alternative to TCS or TCI, but its local adverse effects and limited efficacy affected the choice of this agent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal. Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care. All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Superficial Mycoses in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Facial Lichen Planus Pigmentosus-Like Pigmentation Induced by Vicks VapoRub: A Case Report. Local Hyperthermia Combined With Imiquimod Cleared Recalcitrant and Extensive Warts in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using LED Light Combined With Chromophore Gel in Treating Acne Vulgaris - Preliminary Study. Recalcitrant Female Pattern Hair Loss Like Alopecia Unveils Unexpected Rare Entity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1